老年人潜在不适当用药与死亡风险之间的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105394
Yue Zhou MSN, YuFan Pan MSN, Yi Xiao MSN, YuJian Sun MSN, Yu Dai MSN, YuFeng Yu MD
{"title":"老年人潜在不适当用药与死亡风险之间的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yue Zhou MSN,&nbsp;YuFan Pan MSN,&nbsp;Yi Xiao MSN,&nbsp;YuJian Sun MSN,&nbsp;Yu Dai MSN,&nbsp;YuFeng Yu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively assess the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and mortality risk in older adults through systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Adults aged 60 years and older with PIM use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases up to July 23, 2024. Studies assessing the association between PIM and the risk of death in older adults with sufficient data for meta-analysis were included. Effect sizes were combined using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was systematically explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 44 studies involving 2,191,651 older adults were included. The overall PIM incidence was 45.7% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.0%). Meta-analysis revealed a combined odds ratio (OR) of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.20–1.36) for the association between PIM and increased risk of death. In addition, antipsychotics were associated with a higher risk of death (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.75–2.73), as were anticholinergics (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.23–1.88). Subgroup analyses indicated the association between PIM and death risk was particularly significant in Asia and Oceania, with a weaker association in North America and Europe. The strongest associations were found in individuals aged 70 years and older. The Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria had stronger associations than other diagnostic criteria for PIM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This study confirms a significant association between PIM and mortality risk in older adults, highlighting the need for rational medication use. Clinicians should carefully assess medications in treatment plans. Future research should enhance assessment tools and investigate the impact of PIM on health outcomes to improve medication management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 105394"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Mortality Risk in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yue Zhou MSN,&nbsp;YuFan Pan MSN,&nbsp;Yi Xiao MSN,&nbsp;YuJian Sun MSN,&nbsp;Yu Dai MSN,&nbsp;YuFeng Yu MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively assess the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and mortality risk in older adults through systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Adults aged 60 years and older with PIM use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases up to July 23, 2024. Studies assessing the association between PIM and the risk of death in older adults with sufficient data for meta-analysis were included. Effect sizes were combined using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was systematically explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 44 studies involving 2,191,651 older adults were included. The overall PIM incidence was 45.7% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.0%). Meta-analysis revealed a combined odds ratio (OR) of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.20–1.36) for the association between PIM and increased risk of death. In addition, antipsychotics were associated with a higher risk of death (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.75–2.73), as were anticholinergics (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.23–1.88). Subgroup analyses indicated the association between PIM and death risk was particularly significant in Asia and Oceania, with a weaker association in North America and Europe. The strongest associations were found in individuals aged 70 years and older. The Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria had stronger associations than other diagnostic criteria for PIM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This study confirms a significant association between PIM and mortality risk in older adults, highlighting the need for rational medication use. Clinicians should carefully assess medications in treatment plans. Future research should enhance assessment tools and investigate the impact of PIM on health outcomes to improve medication management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 105394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,全面评估老年人潜在不适当用药(PIM)与死亡风险之间的关系。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。环境和参与者:60岁及以上使用PIM的成年人。方法:系统检索截至2024年7月23日的PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、chinese care and Allied Health Literature Cumulative Index to Nursing (CINAHL)、Scopus和CNKI数据库。纳入了评估PIM与老年人死亡风险之间关系的研究,这些研究有足够的数据进行荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型组合效应大小,并系统地探索异质性。结果:共纳入44项研究,涉及2191651名老年人。PIM总发生率为45.7% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.0%)。荟萃分析显示PIM与死亡风险增加之间的联合优势比(OR)为1.28 (95% CI, 1.20-1.36)。此外,抗精神病药物与较高的死亡风险相关(OR, 2.19;95% CI, 1.75-2.73),抗胆碱能药物也是如此(OR, 1.52;95% ci, 1.23-1.88)。亚组分析表明,PIM与死亡风险之间的关联在亚洲和大洋洲尤为显著,而在北美和欧洲的关联较弱。在70岁及以上的人群中发现了最强的关联。老年人潜在不当处方筛查工具(STOPP)标准与PIM的其他诊断标准有较强的相关性。结论和意义:本研究证实了PIM与老年人死亡风险之间的显著关联,强调了合理用药的必要性。临床医生应仔细评估治疗方案中的药物。未来的研究应加强评估工具,调查PIM对健康结果的影响,以改善用药管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between Potentially Inappropriate Medication and Mortality Risk in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives

This study aimed to comprehensively assess the association between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) and mortality risk in older adults through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting and Participants

Adults aged 60 years and older with PIM use.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases up to July 23, 2024. Studies assessing the association between PIM and the risk of death in older adults with sufficient data for meta-analysis were included. Effect sizes were combined using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was systematically explored.

Results

A total of 44 studies involving 2,191,651 older adults were included. The overall PIM incidence was 45.7% (95% CI, 34.5%-57.0%). Meta-analysis revealed a combined odds ratio (OR) of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.20–1.36) for the association between PIM and increased risk of death. In addition, antipsychotics were associated with a higher risk of death (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.75–2.73), as were anticholinergics (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.23–1.88). Subgroup analyses indicated the association between PIM and death risk was particularly significant in Asia and Oceania, with a weaker association in North America and Europe. The strongest associations were found in individuals aged 70 years and older. The Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria had stronger associations than other diagnostic criteria for PIM.

Conclusions and Implications

This study confirms a significant association between PIM and mortality risk in older adults, highlighting the need for rational medication use. Clinicians should carefully assess medications in treatment plans. Future research should enhance assessment tools and investigate the impact of PIM on health outcomes to improve medication management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Pharmacists Improving Osteoporosis Management in Long-Term Care Using Fracture Risk Assessments: A Feasibility Study Postural Sway Characteristics Distinguish Types of Dementia Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Adults With Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sex-Specific Body Composition Profile Determined by Pelvic Computed Tomography Associated with Mortality in Older Patients with Hip Fracture Factors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1