评价生物活性修复材料和树脂改性玻璃离子水门铁在龋齿第一磨牙修复中的临床性能的随机对照试验。

Kalava Bhavana, K S Uloopi, C Vinay, Penmatsa Chaitanya, Manumanthu Venkata Ramesh, P Ahalya
{"title":"评价生物活性修复材料和树脂改性玻璃离子水门铁在龋齿第一磨牙修复中的临床性能的随机对照试验。","authors":"Kalava Bhavana, K S Uloopi, C Vinay, Penmatsa Chaitanya, Manumanthu Venkata Ramesh, P Ahalya","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance (marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention) of bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in carious primary molar restorations at 6 and 12-month intervals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The split-mouth randomized controlled trial comprised 31 children aged 5-8 years having contralateral matched pair of carious primary molars with an International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II score 5. Sixty-two teeth were randomly allocated into two groups: group I-ACTIVA (<i>n</i> = 31) and group II-RMGIC (<i>n</i> = 31). After caries excavation, the teeth were restored with the respective materials and evaluated the marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention after 6 and 12 months using modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) criteria under the dental operating microscope.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Mann-Whitney \"<i>U</i>\" test was used for intragroup comparison and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for intergroup comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in the surface texture of ACTIVA and RMGIC restorations at both 6-month (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and 12-month (<i>p</i> = 0.001) intervals, whereas the difference in the marginal discoloration and retention were not significant at both 6-month (<i>p</i> = 0.267 and 0.161, respectively) and 12-month intervals (<i>p</i> = 0.339 and 0.064, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surface texture of ACTIVA is found to be superior to RMGIC, whereas marginal discoloration and retention are similar to RMGIC at both 6 and 12-month intervals.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>ACTIVA bioactive restorative material and RMGIC both enhance tooth remineralization with improved adhesion and fluoride release properties, making them valuable choices in various clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Bhavana K, Uloopi K, Vinay C, <i>et al.</i> A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1109-1113.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 10","pages":"1109-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Kalava Bhavana, K S Uloopi, C Vinay, Penmatsa Chaitanya, Manumanthu Venkata Ramesh, P Ahalya\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical performance (marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention) of bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in carious primary molar restorations at 6 and 12-month intervals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The split-mouth randomized controlled trial comprised 31 children aged 5-8 years having contralateral matched pair of carious primary molars with an International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II score 5. Sixty-two teeth were randomly allocated into two groups: group I-ACTIVA (<i>n</i> = 31) and group II-RMGIC (<i>n</i> = 31). After caries excavation, the teeth were restored with the respective materials and evaluated the marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention after 6 and 12 months using modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) criteria under the dental operating microscope.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Mann-Whitney \\\"<i>U</i>\\\" test was used for intragroup comparison and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for intergroup comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found in the surface texture of ACTIVA and RMGIC restorations at both 6-month (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and 12-month (<i>p</i> = 0.001) intervals, whereas the difference in the marginal discoloration and retention were not significant at both 6-month (<i>p</i> = 0.267 and 0.161, respectively) and 12-month intervals (<i>p</i> = 0.339 and 0.064, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surface texture of ACTIVA is found to be superior to RMGIC, whereas marginal discoloration and retention are similar to RMGIC at both 6 and 12-month intervals.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>ACTIVA bioactive restorative material and RMGIC both enhance tooth remineralization with improved adhesion and fluoride release properties, making them valuable choices in various clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Bhavana K, Uloopi K, Vinay C, <i>et al.</i> A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1109-1113.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"1109-1113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617437/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目的:评估生物活性修复材料(ACTIVA)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门合剂(RMGIC)在龋齿初级磨牙修复中的临床表现(边缘变色、表面质地和固位),间隔6个月和12个月。材料与方法:裂口随机对照试验包括31名5-8岁儿童,对侧匹配一对乳牙,国际龋齿检测与评估系统(ICDAS) II评分为5分。将62颗牙齿随机分为两组:I-ACTIVA组(n = 31)和II-RMGIC组(n = 31)。在龋洞挖掘后,采用相应的材料修复牙齿,并在6个月和12个月后在牙科手术显微镜下使用改良的USPHS(美国公共卫生服务)标准评估边缘变色、表面质地和固位。统计分析:组内比较采用Mann-Whitney“U”检验,组间比较采用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验。结果:ACTIVA和RMGIC修复体在6个月(p = 0.002)和12个月(p = 0.001)时的表面质地差异有统计学意义,而在6个月(p = 0.267和0.161)和12个月(p = 0.339和0.064)时,边缘变色和固位差异无统计学意义。结论:ACTIVA的表面质地优于RMGIC,而在6个月和12个月的时间间隔内,边缘变色和保留与RMGIC相似。临床意义:ACTIVA生物活性修复材料和RMGIC均能增强牙齿再矿化,改善附着力和氟化物释放性能,在各种临床情况下都是有价值的选择。文章引用方式:Bhavana K, Uloopi K, Vinay C等。评价生物活性修复材料和树脂改性玻璃离子水门铁在龋齿第一磨牙修复中的临床性能的随机对照试验。中华临床儿科杂志;2017;17(10):1109-1113。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations.

Aim and objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance (marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention) of bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) in carious primary molar restorations at 6 and 12-month intervals.

Materials and methods: The split-mouth randomized controlled trial comprised 31 children aged 5-8 years having contralateral matched pair of carious primary molars with an International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II score 5. Sixty-two teeth were randomly allocated into two groups: group I-ACTIVA (n = 31) and group II-RMGIC (n = 31). After caries excavation, the teeth were restored with the respective materials and evaluated the marginal discoloration, surface texture, and retention after 6 and 12 months using modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) criteria under the dental operating microscope.

Statistical analysis: Mann-Whitney "U" test was used for intragroup comparison and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for intergroup comparison.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the surface texture of ACTIVA and RMGIC restorations at both 6-month (p = 0.002) and 12-month (p = 0.001) intervals, whereas the difference in the marginal discoloration and retention were not significant at both 6-month (p = 0.267 and 0.161, respectively) and 12-month intervals (p = 0.339 and 0.064, respectively).

Conclusion: The surface texture of ACTIVA is found to be superior to RMGIC, whereas marginal discoloration and retention are similar to RMGIC at both 6 and 12-month intervals.

Clinical significance: ACTIVA bioactive restorative material and RMGIC both enhance tooth remineralization with improved adhesion and fluoride release properties, making them valuable choices in various clinical scenarios.

How to cite this article: Bhavana K, Uloopi K, Vinay C, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Carious Primary Molar Restorations. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(10):1109-1113.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of Digital Intraoral Scans Three-dimensional Surface Analysis Compared with Plaster Models Dental Measurement in Mixed Dentition. A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Modeling Videos on Dental Anxiety of 3-6-year-old Children Requiring Treatment under Local Anesthesia: A Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial. An In Vivo Comparative Analysis of Pain Perception in Children Following Lidocaine Gel, Clove Oil, and Precooling for Intraoral Injections: A Pilot Study. An In Vivo Evaluation of Changes in Salivary pH in 3-9-year-old Children Using Chewing Gums (Xylitol) and Lollipops (Xylitol + Erythritol). Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation between Conventional Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Gel-based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Indirect Pulp Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1