生物药物治疗慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者的临床疗效和反应时间:现实体验。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1002/lary.31948
Sante De Santis, Stefania Galassi, Jacopo Cambi
{"title":"生物药物治疗慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者的临床疗效和反应时间:现实体验。","authors":"Sante De Santis, Stefania Galassi, Jacopo Cambi","doi":"10.1002/lary.31948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is a challenging condition often managed with biologic therapies. This study compares the clinical effects and response times of dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in Italian patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bicentric, retrospective study included 33 patients treated at two Italian hospitals between April and December 2023. Inclusion criteria followed EPOS 2020 guidelines, focusing on adults with bilateral polyposis, history of endoscopic sinus surgery, and evidence of type 2 inflammation. Patients self-administered biologics according to AIFA protocols. Outcomes were assessed using SNOT-22 for quality of life, Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) for polyp size, and Sniffin' Sticks-12 for olfactory function at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three treatment groups (dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab) showed significant improvements in SNOT-22 scores from baseline to 9 months, with no significant differences between groups. Dupilumab showed the most rapid and sustained improvement in NPS, with significant reductions observed from 4 weeks onward. Both omalizumab and mepolizumab showed significant NPS reductions by 6 months. Olfactory function improved significantly in the dupilumab group, with a notable decrease in anosmic patients from 64.3% to 28.6% at 9 months. Asthma control, measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, improved across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab significantly improve quality of life and reduce nasal polyp size in CRSwNP patients, with dupilumab showing the fastest response. These findings support the effectiveness of biologics in real-world settings for managing severe CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Effects and Response Time of Biological Drugs in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Patients: Real-life Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Sante De Santis, Stefania Galassi, Jacopo Cambi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.31948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is a challenging condition often managed with biologic therapies. This study compares the clinical effects and response times of dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in Italian patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This bicentric, retrospective study included 33 patients treated at two Italian hospitals between April and December 2023. Inclusion criteria followed EPOS 2020 guidelines, focusing on adults with bilateral polyposis, history of endoscopic sinus surgery, and evidence of type 2 inflammation. Patients self-administered biologics according to AIFA protocols. Outcomes were assessed using SNOT-22 for quality of life, Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) for polyp size, and Sniffin' Sticks-12 for olfactory function at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three treatment groups (dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab) showed significant improvements in SNOT-22 scores from baseline to 9 months, with no significant differences between groups. Dupilumab showed the most rapid and sustained improvement in NPS, with significant reductions observed from 4 weeks onward. Both omalizumab and mepolizumab showed significant NPS reductions by 6 months. Olfactory function improved significantly in the dupilumab group, with a notable decrease in anosmic patients from 64.3% to 28.6% at 9 months. Asthma control, measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, improved across all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab significantly improve quality of life and reduce nasal polyp size in CRSwNP patients, with dupilumab showing the fastest response. These findings support the effectiveness of biologics in real-world settings for managing severe CRSwNP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3 Laryngoscope, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,通常采用生物治疗。本研究比较了dupilumab、omalizumab和mepolizumab在意大利严重不受控制的CRSwNP患者中的临床效果和反应时间。方法:这项双中心回顾性研究纳入了2023年4月至12月在意大利两家医院接受治疗的33例患者。纳入标准遵循epos2020指南,重点关注双侧息肉病、内窥镜鼻窦手术史和2型炎症证据的成年人。患者根据AIFA协议自行给药。在基线、4周、3、6和9个月时,使用SNOT-22评估生活质量,鼻息肉评分(NPS)评估息肉大小,Sniffin' Sticks-12评估嗅觉功能。结果:三个治疗组(dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab)从基线到9个月的SNOT-22评分均有显著改善,组间无显著差异。Dupilumab在NPS方面表现出最快速和持续的改善,从4周后观察到显著降低。omalizumab和mepolizumab在6个月时均显示显著的NPS降低。dupilumab组的嗅觉功能显著改善,嗅觉丧失患者的比例在9个月时从64.3%下降到28.6%。通过哮喘控制测试(ACT)得分来衡量的哮喘控制在所有组中都有所改善。结论:Dupilumab、omalizumab和mepolizumab均能显著改善CRSwNP患者的生活质量,减小鼻息肉大小,其中Dupilumab反应最快。这些发现支持了生物制剂在现实环境中治疗严重CRSwNP的有效性。证据级别:3喉镜,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Effects and Response Time of Biological Drugs in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Patients: Real-life Experience.

Objective: Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) is a challenging condition often managed with biologic therapies. This study compares the clinical effects and response times of dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab in Italian patients with severe uncontrolled CRSwNP.

Methods: This bicentric, retrospective study included 33 patients treated at two Italian hospitals between April and December 2023. Inclusion criteria followed EPOS 2020 guidelines, focusing on adults with bilateral polyposis, history of endoscopic sinus surgery, and evidence of type 2 inflammation. Patients self-administered biologics according to AIFA protocols. Outcomes were assessed using SNOT-22 for quality of life, Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) for polyp size, and Sniffin' Sticks-12 for olfactory function at baseline, 4 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months.

Results: All three treatment groups (dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab) showed significant improvements in SNOT-22 scores from baseline to 9 months, with no significant differences between groups. Dupilumab showed the most rapid and sustained improvement in NPS, with significant reductions observed from 4 weeks onward. Both omalizumab and mepolizumab showed significant NPS reductions by 6 months. Olfactory function improved significantly in the dupilumab group, with a notable decrease in anosmic patients from 64.3% to 28.6% at 9 months. Asthma control, measured by Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, improved across all groups.

Conclusion: Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab significantly improve quality of life and reduce nasal polyp size in CRSwNP patients, with dupilumab showing the fastest response. These findings support the effectiveness of biologics in real-world settings for managing severe CRSwNP.

Level of evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
期刊最新文献
A Deep-Learning Model for Multi-class Audio Classification of Vocal Fold Pathologies in Office Stroboscopy. Bowing Index in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, and Ataxia. Hypopharyngeal Amyloidosis: A Rare Cause of Dysphagia. Effect of Tympanostomy Tube Removal Technique on Surgical Success and Operative Time. Pathogens and Prognosis of Deep Neck Infection in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1