Jia Luo, Yifan Zhang, Ziyang Yu, Xi Jiang, Jianhui Li, Bo Chen, Ping Di, Ye Lin, Yu Zhang
{"title":"回顾性单队列研究了种植体支持的整体氧化锆基框架十字弓固定义齿5-13年的临床结果。","authors":"Jia Luo, Yifan Zhang, Ziyang Yu, Xi Jiang, Jianhui Li, Bo Chen, Ping Di, Ye Lin, Yu Zhang","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the mid-to-long term clinical outcomes of the implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with monolithic zirconia-based frameworks and related risk factors of success and survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study encompassed individuals exhibiting terminal dentition or edentulism in the maxilla and/or mandible who underwent treatment involving IFCDPs with monolithic zirconia frameworks. Inclusion criteria required a documented follow-up period of at least five years post-definitive prosthesis delivery. Evaluation of outcomes focused on the survival rates of implant and prosthesis, along with the incidence of biological and technical complications. The mixed-effects Cox regression model was employed to analyze the risk factors associated with prosthesis failure and peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 47 patients, consisting of 14 women and 33 men with a mean age of 55.2 ± 12.5 years (range: 25-83), was included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 71.6 ±13.2 months (mean ± SD, range: 60-147). A total of 51 cross-arch prostheses supported by 302 implants, distributed between the maxilla (27 prostheses) and mandible (24 prostheses), were assessed. By the end of the follow-up period, 289 (97.64%) of the 302 implants remained functional. Peri-implantitis was observed in 27 implants (24 in mandible), yielding an overall implant-related success rate of 91.06%. Nine frameworks experienced fractures (eight in mandible), resulting in an overall prosthesis-related survival rate of 82.35%. Subsequent analysis revealed the mandible to be a significant risk factor for framework fracture (HR = 11.64, p = 0.024) and peri-implantitis (HR = 10.88, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses featuring monolithic zirconia-based frameworks demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes throughout a 5-13-year observation period. Notably, in the design of monolithic zirconia-based framework prostheses, the mandible emerged as a significant risk factor for framework fractures and an independent risk factor for peri-implantitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective single cohort study on the 5-13 year clinical outcomes of implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses with monolithic zirconia-based frameworks.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Luo, Yifan Zhang, Ziyang Yu, Xi Jiang, Jianhui Li, Bo Chen, Ping Di, Ye Lin, Yu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the mid-to-long term clinical outcomes of the implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with monolithic zirconia-based frameworks and related risk factors of success and survival.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study encompassed individuals exhibiting terminal dentition or edentulism in the maxilla and/or mandible who underwent treatment involving IFCDPs with monolithic zirconia frameworks. Inclusion criteria required a documented follow-up period of at least five years post-definitive prosthesis delivery. Evaluation of outcomes focused on the survival rates of implant and prosthesis, along with the incidence of biological and technical complications. The mixed-effects Cox regression model was employed to analyze the risk factors associated with prosthesis failure and peri-implantitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 47 patients, consisting of 14 women and 33 men with a mean age of 55.2 ± 12.5 years (range: 25-83), was included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 71.6 ±13.2 months (mean ± SD, range: 60-147). A total of 51 cross-arch prostheses supported by 302 implants, distributed between the maxilla (27 prostheses) and mandible (24 prostheses), were assessed. By the end of the follow-up period, 289 (97.64%) of the 302 implants remained functional. Peri-implantitis was observed in 27 implants (24 in mandible), yielding an overall implant-related success rate of 91.06%. Nine frameworks experienced fractures (eight in mandible), resulting in an overall prosthesis-related survival rate of 82.35%. Subsequent analysis revealed the mandible to be a significant risk factor for framework fracture (HR = 11.64, p = 0.024) and peri-implantitis (HR = 10.88, p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses featuring monolithic zirconia-based frameworks demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes throughout a 5-13-year observation period. Notably, in the design of monolithic zirconia-based framework prostheses, the mandible emerged as a significant risk factor for framework fractures and an independent risk factor for peri-implantitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13991\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨整体氧化锆框架种植体支撑十字弓固定义齿(IFCDPs)的中长期临床效果及其成功和存活的相关危险因素。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了上颌和/或下颌骨表现出末端牙列或牙列症的患者,这些患者接受了采用整体氧化锆框架的ifcdp治疗。纳入标准要求最终假体交付后至少5年的记录随访期。结果评估的重点是种植体和假体的存活率,以及生物和技术并发症的发生率。采用混合效应Cox回归模型分析假体失败和种植体周围炎的相关危险因素。结果:本研究纳入了47例患者,包括14例女性和33例男性,平均年龄为55.2±12.5岁(范围:25-83)。平均随访时间为71.6±13.2个月(平均±SD,范围60-147)。共评估了51个由302个种植体支撑的交叉弓假体,分布在上颌(27个假体)和下颌骨(24个假体)之间。随访结束时,302个植入物中289个(97.64%)仍然有效。种植体周围炎27例(下颌骨24例),种植体相关成功率为91.06%。9个框架发生骨折(8个在下颌骨),导致整体假体相关存活率为82.35%。随后的分析显示,下颌骨是发生框架骨折(HR = 11.64, p = 0.024)和种植体周围炎(HR = 10.88, p = 0.003)的重要危险因素。结论:在5-13年的观察中,采用整体氧化锆基框架的种植体支撑十字弓固定义齿具有良好的临床效果。值得注意的是,在整体氧化锆基框架假体的设计中,下颌骨成为框架骨折的重要危险因素,也是种植体周围炎的独立危险因素。
A retrospective single cohort study on the 5-13 year clinical outcomes of implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses with monolithic zirconia-based frameworks.
Purpose: To investigate the mid-to-long term clinical outcomes of the implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with monolithic zirconia-based frameworks and related risk factors of success and survival.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study encompassed individuals exhibiting terminal dentition or edentulism in the maxilla and/or mandible who underwent treatment involving IFCDPs with monolithic zirconia frameworks. Inclusion criteria required a documented follow-up period of at least five years post-definitive prosthesis delivery. Evaluation of outcomes focused on the survival rates of implant and prosthesis, along with the incidence of biological and technical complications. The mixed-effects Cox regression model was employed to analyze the risk factors associated with prosthesis failure and peri-implantitis.
Results: A cohort of 47 patients, consisting of 14 women and 33 men with a mean age of 55.2 ± 12.5 years (range: 25-83), was included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 71.6 ±13.2 months (mean ± SD, range: 60-147). A total of 51 cross-arch prostheses supported by 302 implants, distributed between the maxilla (27 prostheses) and mandible (24 prostheses), were assessed. By the end of the follow-up period, 289 (97.64%) of the 302 implants remained functional. Peri-implantitis was observed in 27 implants (24 in mandible), yielding an overall implant-related success rate of 91.06%. Nine frameworks experienced fractures (eight in mandible), resulting in an overall prosthesis-related survival rate of 82.35%. Subsequent analysis revealed the mandible to be a significant risk factor for framework fracture (HR = 11.64, p = 0.024) and peri-implantitis (HR = 10.88, p = 0.003).
Conclusions: The implant-supported cross-arch fixed dental prostheses featuring monolithic zirconia-based frameworks demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes throughout a 5-13-year observation period. Notably, in the design of monolithic zirconia-based framework prostheses, the mandible emerged as a significant risk factor for framework fractures and an independent risk factor for peri-implantitis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.