基于深度学习的三维重建数字乳房断层合成图像的乳腺体积密度估计。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1200/CCI.24.00103
Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Nehal Doiphode, Walter C Mankowski, Eric A Cohen, Sarthak Pati, Lauren Pantalone, Spyridon Bakas, Ari Brooks, Celine M Vachon, Emily F Conant, Aimilia Gastounioti, Despina Kontos
{"title":"基于深度学习的三维重建数字乳房断层合成图像的乳腺体积密度估计。","authors":"Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Nehal Doiphode, Walter C Mankowski, Eric A Cohen, Sarthak Pati, Lauren Pantalone, Spyridon Bakas, Ari Brooks, Celine M Vachon, Emily F Conant, Aimilia Gastounioti, Despina Kontos","doi":"10.1200/CCI.24.00103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast density is a widely established independent breast cancer risk factor. With the increasing utilization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening, there is an opportunity to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) routinely. However, current available methods extrapolate VBD from two-dimensional (2D) images acquired using DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived by clinical centers because of storage constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 nonactionable three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed DBT screening examinations acquired between 2011 and 2016. Reference tissue segmentations were generated using previously validated software that uses 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data. We developed a deep learning (DL) model that segments dense and fatty breast tissue from background. We then applied this model to estimate %VBD and absolute dense volume (ADV) in cm<sup>3</sup> in a separate case-control sample (180 cases and 654 controls). We created two conditional logistic regression models, relating each model-derived density measurement to likelihood of contralateral breast cancer diagnosis, adjusted for age, BMI, family history, and menopausal status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL model achieved unweighted and weighted Dice scores of 0.88 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.08) and 0.76 (SD = 0.15), respectively, on the held-out test set, demonstrating good agreement between the model and 3D reference segmentations. There was a significant association between the odds of breast cancer diagnosis and model-derived VBD (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95 % CI, 1.13 to 1.77]; <i>P</i> = .002), with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.69). ADV was also significantly associated with breast cancer diagnosis (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.73]; <i>P</i> < .001) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL-derived density measures derived from 3D reconstructed DBT images are associated with breast cancer diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volumetric Breast Density Estimation From Three-Dimensional Reconstructed Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Deep Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Vinayak S Ahluwalia, Nehal Doiphode, Walter C Mankowski, Eric A Cohen, Sarthak Pati, Lauren Pantalone, Spyridon Bakas, Ari Brooks, Celine M Vachon, Emily F Conant, Aimilia Gastounioti, Despina Kontos\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI.24.00103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast density is a widely established independent breast cancer risk factor. With the increasing utilization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening, there is an opportunity to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) routinely. However, current available methods extrapolate VBD from two-dimensional (2D) images acquired using DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived by clinical centers because of storage constraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 nonactionable three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed DBT screening examinations acquired between 2011 and 2016. Reference tissue segmentations were generated using previously validated software that uses 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data. We developed a deep learning (DL) model that segments dense and fatty breast tissue from background. We then applied this model to estimate %VBD and absolute dense volume (ADV) in cm<sup>3</sup> in a separate case-control sample (180 cases and 654 controls). We created two conditional logistic regression models, relating each model-derived density measurement to likelihood of contralateral breast cancer diagnosis, adjusted for age, BMI, family history, and menopausal status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL model achieved unweighted and weighted Dice scores of 0.88 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.08) and 0.76 (SD = 0.15), respectively, on the held-out test set, demonstrating good agreement between the model and 3D reference segmentations. There was a significant association between the odds of breast cancer diagnosis and model-derived VBD (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95 % CI, 1.13 to 1.77]; <i>P</i> = .002), with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.69). ADV was also significantly associated with breast cancer diagnosis (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.73]; <i>P</i> < .001) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL-derived density measures derived from 3D reconstructed DBT images are associated with breast cancer diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺密度是一个广泛确立的独立的乳腺癌危险因素。随着数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)在乳腺癌筛查中的应用越来越多,有机会常规估计乳腺体积密度(VBD)。然而,目前可用的方法是从使用DBT获得的二维(2D)图像中推断出VBD和/或依赖于原始DBT数据的存在,由于存储限制,临床中心很少存档这些数据。方法回顾性分析2011年至2016年间获得的1,080例不可操作的三维重建DBT筛查检查。使用先前验证的软件生成参考组织分割,该软件使用3D重建切片和原始2D DBT数据。我们开发了一个深度学习(DL)模型,从背景中分割致密和脂肪乳腺组织。然后,我们应用该模型在单独的病例对照样本(180例和654例对照)中估计VBD %和绝对密度体积(ADV) (cm3)。我们创建了两个条件逻辑回归模型,将每个模型衍生的密度测量与对侧乳腺癌诊断的可能性联系起来,并根据年龄、BMI、家族史和绝经状态进行调整。结果:DL模型在hold -out测试集上的未加权和加权Dice得分分别为0.88(标准差[SD] = 0.08)和0.76 (SD = 0.15),表明模型与3D参考分割之间具有良好的一致性。乳腺癌诊断的几率与模型衍生的VBD之间存在显著关联(比值比[OR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.13 ~ 1.77];P = 0.002), AUC为0.65 (95% CI, 0.60 ~ 0.69)。ADV也与乳腺癌诊断显著相关(OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22至1.73];P < 0.001), AUC为0.67 (95% CI, 0.62 ~ 0.71)。结论:基于三维重建DBT图像的dl衍生密度测量与乳腺癌诊断相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volumetric Breast Density Estimation From Three-Dimensional Reconstructed Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using Deep Learning.

Purpose: Breast density is a widely established independent breast cancer risk factor. With the increasing utilization of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening, there is an opportunity to estimate volumetric breast density (VBD) routinely. However, current available methods extrapolate VBD from two-dimensional (2D) images acquired using DBT and/or depend on the existence of raw DBT data, which is rarely archived by clinical centers because of storage constraints.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,080 nonactionable three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed DBT screening examinations acquired between 2011 and 2016. Reference tissue segmentations were generated using previously validated software that uses 3D reconstructed slices and raw 2D DBT data. We developed a deep learning (DL) model that segments dense and fatty breast tissue from background. We then applied this model to estimate %VBD and absolute dense volume (ADV) in cm3 in a separate case-control sample (180 cases and 654 controls). We created two conditional logistic regression models, relating each model-derived density measurement to likelihood of contralateral breast cancer diagnosis, adjusted for age, BMI, family history, and menopausal status.

Results: The DL model achieved unweighted and weighted Dice scores of 0.88 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.08) and 0.76 (SD = 0.15), respectively, on the held-out test set, demonstrating good agreement between the model and 3D reference segmentations. There was a significant association between the odds of breast cancer diagnosis and model-derived VBD (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95 % CI, 1.13 to 1.77]; P = .002), with an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.69). ADV was also significantly associated with breast cancer diagnosis (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.22 to 1.73]; P < .001) with an AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71).

Conclusion: DL-derived density measures derived from 3D reconstructed DBT images are associated with breast cancer diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Comparing Functional Avoidance and Standard Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Lung Cancer. Advancements in Interoperability: Achieving Anatomic Pathology Reports That Adhere to International Standards and Are Both Human-Readable and Readily Computable. Incorporating Structured and Unstructured Data Sources to Identify and Characterize Hereditary Cancer Testing Among Veterans With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Leveraging Radiotherapy Data for Precision Oncology: Veterans Affairs Granular Radiotherapy Information Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1