癌症中心绩效委员会与新的乳腺癌质量指标:历史数据回顾。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x
Marie L Fefferman, Danielle M Thompson, Lee G Wilke, Shelley Hwang, Richard Bleicher, Laura M Freedman, Jane L Meisel, Kristine Kuchta, Katharine Yao
{"title":"癌症中心绩效委员会与新的乳腺癌质量指标:历史数据回顾。","authors":"Marie L Fefferman, Danielle M Thompson, Lee G Wilke, Shelley Hwang, Richard Bleicher, Laura M Freedman, Jane L Meisel, Kristine Kuchta, Katharine Yao","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2022, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) has developed three new breast cancer quality measures (QMs): time to surgery (BCSdx) and radiation (BCSRT) and the use of neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2/neu positive breast cancer (BneoCT). This study assesses CoC center historical performance for these measures and facility factors associated with low performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the median number of days for time to surgery and radiation, and the proportion of facilities that achieved an estimated performance rate (EPR) of 70%, 80%, and 90% from 2004 to 2020 for all three measures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between facility factors and not achieving 80% EPR for all three measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of days to surgery and radiation in 2004 were 16 and 43, respectively, compared with 34 and 48 in 2020 (p < 0.01). For BneoCT, BCSdx, and BCSRT measures, the proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR was 68.5%, 72.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. The proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR in 2004 was 92.3% for BCSdx and 49.8% for BCSRT compared with 69.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in 2020. BneoCT performance improved over time. Academic facilities and facilities serving a larger proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were approximately twice as likely to be unable to achieve compliance with all three QMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performance levels for BCSRT are the lowest of all three measures. Academic centers and centers with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients are more likely to have lower adherence with all three QMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2045-2055"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commission on Cancer Center Performance with the New Breast Cancer Quality Measures: A Review of Historical Data.\",\"authors\":\"Marie L Fefferman, Danielle M Thompson, Lee G Wilke, Shelley Hwang, Richard Bleicher, Laura M Freedman, Jane L Meisel, Kristine Kuchta, Katharine Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2022, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) has developed three new breast cancer quality measures (QMs): time to surgery (BCSdx) and radiation (BCSRT) and the use of neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2/neu positive breast cancer (BneoCT). This study assesses CoC center historical performance for these measures and facility factors associated with low performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the median number of days for time to surgery and radiation, and the proportion of facilities that achieved an estimated performance rate (EPR) of 70%, 80%, and 90% from 2004 to 2020 for all three measures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between facility factors and not achieving 80% EPR for all three measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median number of days to surgery and radiation in 2004 were 16 and 43, respectively, compared with 34 and 48 in 2020 (p < 0.01). For BneoCT, BCSdx, and BCSRT measures, the proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR was 68.5%, 72.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. The proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR in 2004 was 92.3% for BCSdx and 49.8% for BCSRT compared with 69.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in 2020. BneoCT performance improved over time. Academic facilities and facilities serving a larger proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were approximately twice as likely to be unable to achieve compliance with all three QMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performance levels for BCSRT are the lowest of all three measures. Academic centers and centers with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients are more likely to have lower adherence with all three QMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2045-2055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16594-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自2022年以来,美国癌症委员会(CoC)制定了三种新的乳腺癌质量指标(QMs):手术时间(BCSdx)和放疗时间(BCSRT),以及三阴性和HER2/neu阳性乳腺癌(BneoCT)的新辅助治疗使用。本研究评估了CoC中心的这些措施的历史表现和与低表现相关的设施因素。方法:从2004年到2020年,我们检查了手术和放疗时间的中位数天数,以及在所有三项措施中达到70%、80%和90%的估计绩效率(EPR)的设施比例。采用多变量logistic回归分析来确定设施因素与所有三项措施未达到80% EPR之间的关系。结果:2004年手术和放疗的中位天数分别为16天和43天,而2020年为34天和48天(p < 0.01)。对于BneoCT、BCSdx和BCSRT措施,达到≥80% EPR的设施比例分别为68.5%、72.2%和35.2%。2004年,BCSdx和BCSRT达到≥80% EPR的设施比例分别为92.3%和49.8%,而2020年分别为69.6%和39.4%。BneoCT的性能随着时间的推移而提高。学术设施和服务于较大比例社会经济弱势患者的设施无法实现所有三个质量管理标准的可能性约为其两倍。结论:BCSRT的表现水平是三种测量方法中最低的。学术中心和医疗补助患者比例较高的中心更有可能对所有三个质量管理指标的依从性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commission on Cancer Center Performance with the New Breast Cancer Quality Measures: A Review of Historical Data.

Background: Since 2022, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) has developed three new breast cancer quality measures (QMs): time to surgery (BCSdx) and radiation (BCSRT) and the use of neoadjuvant therapy for triple negative and HER2/neu positive breast cancer (BneoCT). This study assesses CoC center historical performance for these measures and facility factors associated with low performance.

Methods: We examined the median number of days for time to surgery and radiation, and the proportion of facilities that achieved an estimated performance rate (EPR) of 70%, 80%, and 90% from 2004 to 2020 for all three measures. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between facility factors and not achieving 80% EPR for all three measures.

Results: The median number of days to surgery and radiation in 2004 were 16 and 43, respectively, compared with 34 and 48 in 2020 (p < 0.01). For BneoCT, BCSdx, and BCSRT measures, the proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR was 68.5%, 72.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. The proportion of facilities that attained ≥ 80% EPR in 2004 was 92.3% for BCSdx and 49.8% for BCSRT compared with 69.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in 2020. BneoCT performance improved over time. Academic facilities and facilities serving a larger proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were approximately twice as likely to be unable to achieve compliance with all three QMs.

Conclusions: Performance levels for BCSRT are the lowest of all three measures. Academic centers and centers with a higher proportion of Medicaid patients are more likely to have lower adherence with all three QMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
ASO Visual Abstract: Living Flat-Stories from Women of Color After Mastectomy. ASO Visual Abstract: Comparison of Ampullary and Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas-Smaller Invasion, Common Adenomatous Components, Resectability, and Histology are Factors for Improved Survival for Patients with Ampullary Adenocarcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: The Predictive Factors of Combined Implant Application for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Immediate Breast Reconstruction with a Pedicled Omental Flap. ASO Visual Abstract: The Impact of Radioactive Iodine on Disease-Specific Survival in Low-to-Intermediate Risk N1b Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: An Organoid Model for the Therapeutic Effect of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1