戊二醛脱敏剂对牙齿敏感性和牙齿漂白后颜色控制的随机临床试验

Q1 Dentistry European Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1789603
Raíssa Araújo de Mesquita, Elma Vieira Takeuchi, Cardoso de Oliveira Pereira Maria Eduarda, Jesuina Lamartine Nogueira Araújo, Eliane Bermeguy Alves, Cecy Martins Silva
{"title":"戊二醛脱敏剂对牙齿敏感性和牙齿漂白后颜色控制的随机临床试验","authors":"Raíssa Araújo de Mesquita, Elma Vieira Takeuchi, Cardoso de Oliveira Pereira Maria Eduarda, Jesuina Lamartine Nogueira Araújo, Eliane Bermeguy Alves, Cecy Martins Silva","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1789603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study evaluated the effect of the application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer on the prevention of tooth sensitivity (TS) and the changes in the color of the teeth after bleaching.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> Twenty-five patients were selected for participation in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients' right and left hemiarches were randomized into two groups: the placebo group, which received distilled water application and whitening treatment, and the Gluma group, which received Gluma application, followed by whitening treatment. The patients were examined after three bleaching sessions with 35% hydrogen peroxide. TS was measured using a numerical rating scale for 21 days from the beginning of bleaching. The tooth color was monitored using a spectrophotometer at times T0 (baseline) and T1 (after 21 days). The color analysis results were recorded using the CieLab system; the CIEDE2000 formula was applied to obtain the ΔE<sup>00</sup> and ΔL values.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong> For statistical analysis, the Friedman analysis of variance test was used for intragroup evaluation, and the Wilcoxon test was used for a between-group comparison of the TS results. Student's <i>t</i>-test paired the ΔE<sup>00</sup> and ΔL values of the groups. A 5% significance level was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Intragroup analysis of the sensitivity results showed a statistically significant difference between the pain levels evaluated through days 1 to 21 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the highest median values were observed on the days when the whitening sessions were performed (days 1, 8, and 15) and right after the sessions (days 2, 9, and 16). However, in the intergroup analysis, no statistical difference in sensitivity was found between the placebo and Gluma. No statistical difference was found between the influences of the placebo and Gluma treatments on the color obtained after tooth whitening using parameters ᐃE<sup>00</sup> and ᐃL (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The use of Gluma prior to bleaching does not prevent TS and does not interfere with the color results obtained by tooth bleaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Glutaraldehyde-Based Desensitizer on Control of Tooth Sensitivity and Tooth Color Post-bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Raíssa Araújo de Mesquita, Elma Vieira Takeuchi, Cardoso de Oliveira Pereira Maria Eduarda, Jesuina Lamartine Nogueira Araújo, Eliane Bermeguy Alves, Cecy Martins Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1789603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> This randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study evaluated the effect of the application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer on the prevention of tooth sensitivity (TS) and the changes in the color of the teeth after bleaching.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> Twenty-five patients were selected for participation in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients' right and left hemiarches were randomized into two groups: the placebo group, which received distilled water application and whitening treatment, and the Gluma group, which received Gluma application, followed by whitening treatment. The patients were examined after three bleaching sessions with 35% hydrogen peroxide. TS was measured using a numerical rating scale for 21 days from the beginning of bleaching. The tooth color was monitored using a spectrophotometer at times T0 (baseline) and T1 (after 21 days). The color analysis results were recorded using the CieLab system; the CIEDE2000 formula was applied to obtain the ΔE<sup>00</sup> and ΔL values.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong> For statistical analysis, the Friedman analysis of variance test was used for intragroup evaluation, and the Wilcoxon test was used for a between-group comparison of the TS results. Student's <i>t</i>-test paired the ΔE<sup>00</sup> and ΔL values of the groups. A 5% significance level was adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Intragroup analysis of the sensitivity results showed a statistically significant difference between the pain levels evaluated through days 1 to 21 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and the highest median values were observed on the days when the whitening sessions were performed (days 1, 8, and 15) and right after the sessions (days 2, 9, and 16). However, in the intergroup analysis, no statistical difference in sensitivity was found between the placebo and Gluma. No statistical difference was found between the influences of the placebo and Gluma treatments on the color obtained after tooth whitening using parameters ᐃE<sup>00</sup> and ᐃL (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The use of Gluma prior to bleaching does not prevent TS and does not interfere with the color results obtained by tooth bleaching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1789603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本随机、对照、单盲、裂口临床研究评估应用戊二醛脱敏剂对预防牙齿敏感(TS)和牙齿漂白后颜色变化的影响。材料和方法:根据纳入和排除标准,选择25例患者参与研究。将患者的左右半球随机分为两组:安慰剂组,使用蒸馏水涂抹并进行美白治疗;Gluma组,使用Gluma涂抹后进行美白治疗。患者在用35%过氧化氢漂白三次后进行检查。从白化开始21天内,使用数值评定量表测量TS。在T0(基线)和T1(21天后)用分光光度计监测牙齿颜色。采用CieLab系统记录颜色分析结果;应用CIEDE2000公式得到ΔE00和ΔL的值。统计学分析:统计学分析采用Friedman方差分析检验进行组内评价,采用Wilcoxon检验进行TS结果的组间比较。学生t检验配对组的ΔE00和ΔL值。采用5%的显著性水平。结果:组内敏感性分析结果显示,第1 ~ 21天疼痛水平与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:在牙齿漂白前使用Gluma不会预防TS,也不会影响牙齿漂白获得的颜色结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Glutaraldehyde-Based Desensitizer on Control of Tooth Sensitivity and Tooth Color Post-bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objectives:  This randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study evaluated the effect of the application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer on the prevention of tooth sensitivity (TS) and the changes in the color of the teeth after bleaching.

Materials and methods:  Twenty-five patients were selected for participation in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients' right and left hemiarches were randomized into two groups: the placebo group, which received distilled water application and whitening treatment, and the Gluma group, which received Gluma application, followed by whitening treatment. The patients were examined after three bleaching sessions with 35% hydrogen peroxide. TS was measured using a numerical rating scale for 21 days from the beginning of bleaching. The tooth color was monitored using a spectrophotometer at times T0 (baseline) and T1 (after 21 days). The color analysis results were recorded using the CieLab system; the CIEDE2000 formula was applied to obtain the ΔE00 and ΔL values.

Statistical analysis:  For statistical analysis, the Friedman analysis of variance test was used for intragroup evaluation, and the Wilcoxon test was used for a between-group comparison of the TS results. Student's t-test paired the ΔE00 and ΔL values of the groups. A 5% significance level was adopted.

Results:  Intragroup analysis of the sensitivity results showed a statistically significant difference between the pain levels evaluated through days 1 to 21 (p < 0.001), and the highest median values were observed on the days when the whitening sessions were performed (days 1, 8, and 15) and right after the sessions (days 2, 9, and 16). However, in the intergroup analysis, no statistical difference in sensitivity was found between the placebo and Gluma. No statistical difference was found between the influences of the placebo and Gluma treatments on the color obtained after tooth whitening using parameters ᐃE00 and ᐃL (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:  The use of Gluma prior to bleaching does not prevent TS and does not interfere with the color results obtained by tooth bleaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Evaluation of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Root Canal Cleanliness: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. A Retrospective Study Using a Novel Body-Shift Implant Design with a Novel Alloplastic Particulate Grafting Material in Immediate Extraction Sockets. Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Implant-Supported Restorations with Different CAD-CAM Restorative Materials. Association of Polymorphism with Periodontitis and Salivary Levels of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α. The Effect of Different Chemical Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Resin-Matrix Ceramic Repaired with Resin Composite.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1