胆汁酸引流液对微创直肠癌术后吻合口漏早期诊断及安全出院的前瞻性队列研究

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.032
Linfeng Gao MS , Tao Zhang MS , Xicheng Chen MS , Sen Dong MS , Donglin Chen MS , Nanhui Liu MS , Bo Tang MD, PhD
{"title":"胆汁酸引流液对微创直肠癌术后吻合口漏早期诊断及安全出院的前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Linfeng Gao MS ,&nbsp;Tao Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Xicheng Chen MS ,&nbsp;Sen Dong MS ,&nbsp;Donglin Chen MS ,&nbsp;Nanhui Liu MS ,&nbsp;Bo Tang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of bile acid levels in drainage fluid for early prediction and exclusion of anastomotic leakage, and assess the performance in allowing a safe discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective single-center study was conducted in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had received minimally invasive anterior resection consecutively from December 2021 to March 2024. Bile acid in drainage fluid, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in serum were measured on the third and fifth day after surgery. Four criteria were considered in discharging patients: a C-reactive protein level below 100 mg/L, flatus with or without defecation, a restore of liquid diet, a bile acid level less than 2 μmol/L.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 419 patients were included and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (<em>n</em> = 37; 8.8%) and a nonanastomotic leakage group (<em>n</em> = 382; 91.2%). Of those patients, 384 accorded with the discharge criteria and 380 of them (99%) discharged safely. The rate of anastomotic leakage after discharge and readmission was 0.5% and 0.3%. Bile acid levels in drainage fluid in the anastomotic leakage group were significantly greater than that in the nonanastomotic leakage group on both postoperative days 3 and 5 (postoperative day 3: 3.00 [2.00–5.17] μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40–1.30] μmol/L, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; and postoperative day 5: 5.17 [3.00–9.20] μmol/L vs 2.00 [1.40–3.50] μmol/L, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The negative predictive value in ruling out an anastomotic leakage were 0.96 on postoperative day 3 and 0.97 on postoperative day 5 for bile acid alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Drainage bile acid has a high negative predictive value in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and showed potential to allow for safe discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 108949"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bile acid in drainage fluid for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and safe discharge after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Linfeng Gao MS ,&nbsp;Tao Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Xicheng Chen MS ,&nbsp;Sen Dong MS ,&nbsp;Donglin Chen MS ,&nbsp;Nanhui Liu MS ,&nbsp;Bo Tang MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of bile acid levels in drainage fluid for early prediction and exclusion of anastomotic leakage, and assess the performance in allowing a safe discharge.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective single-center study was conducted in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had received minimally invasive anterior resection consecutively from December 2021 to March 2024. Bile acid in drainage fluid, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in serum were measured on the third and fifth day after surgery. Four criteria were considered in discharging patients: a C-reactive protein level below 100 mg/L, flatus with or without defecation, a restore of liquid diet, a bile acid level less than 2 μmol/L.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 419 patients were included and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (<em>n</em> = 37; 8.8%) and a nonanastomotic leakage group (<em>n</em> = 382; 91.2%). Of those patients, 384 accorded with the discharge criteria and 380 of them (99%) discharged safely. The rate of anastomotic leakage after discharge and readmission was 0.5% and 0.3%. Bile acid levels in drainage fluid in the anastomotic leakage group were significantly greater than that in the nonanastomotic leakage group on both postoperative days 3 and 5 (postoperative day 3: 3.00 [2.00–5.17] μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40–1.30] μmol/L, <em>P</em> &lt; .001; and postoperative day 5: 5.17 [3.00–9.20] μmol/L vs 2.00 [1.40–3.50] μmol/L, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). The negative predictive value in ruling out an anastomotic leakage were 0.96 on postoperative day 3 and 0.97 on postoperative day 5 for bile acid alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Drainage bile acid has a high negative predictive value in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and showed potential to allow for safe discharge.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606024009243\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606024009243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估引流液胆汁酸水平对早期预测和排除吻合口瘘的诊断价值,并评估其在安全出院方面的表现。方法:本前瞻性单中心研究纳入2021年12月至2024年3月连续行微创前切除术的直肠癌患者。术后第3、5天测定引流液胆汁酸、血清c反应蛋白、降钙素原。出院患者考虑四个标准:c反应蛋白水平低于100 mg/L,有或没有排便的肠胃胀气,恢复流食,胆汁酸水平低于2 μmol/L。结果:共纳入419例患者,分为吻合口瘘组(n = 37;8.8%)和非吻合口瘘组(n = 382;91.2%)。其中符合出院标准384例,安全出院380例(99%)。出院后吻合口瘘发生率为0.5%,再入院后吻合口瘘发生率为0.3%。术后第3、5天吻合口瘘组引流液胆汁酸水平均显著高于非吻合口瘘组(术后第3天:3.00 [2.00-5.17]μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40-1.30] μmol/L, P < 0.001;术后第5天:5.17 [3.00-9.20]μmol/L vs . 2.00 [1.40-3.50] μmol/L, P < 0.001)。单用胆汁酸排除吻合口漏的阴性预测值分别为术后第3天0.96和第5天0.97。结论:胆汁酸引流对吻合口瘘早期诊断具有较高的阴性预测价值,为安全引流提供了可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bile acid in drainage fluid for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and safe discharge after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection: A prospective cohort study

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of bile acid levels in drainage fluid for early prediction and exclusion of anastomotic leakage, and assess the performance in allowing a safe discharge.

Methods

This prospective single-center study was conducted in patients diagnosed with rectal cancer who had received minimally invasive anterior resection consecutively from December 2021 to March 2024. Bile acid in drainage fluid, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in serum were measured on the third and fifth day after surgery. Four criteria were considered in discharging patients: a C-reactive protein level below 100 mg/L, flatus with or without defecation, a restore of liquid diet, a bile acid level less than 2 μmol/L.

Results

A total of 419 patients were included and divided into an anastomotic leakage group (n = 37; 8.8%) and a nonanastomotic leakage group (n = 382; 91.2%). Of those patients, 384 accorded with the discharge criteria and 380 of them (99%) discharged safely. The rate of anastomotic leakage after discharge and readmission was 0.5% and 0.3%. Bile acid levels in drainage fluid in the anastomotic leakage group were significantly greater than that in the nonanastomotic leakage group on both postoperative days 3 and 5 (postoperative day 3: 3.00 [2.00–5.17] μmol/L vs 0.80 [0.40–1.30] μmol/L, P < .001; and postoperative day 5: 5.17 [3.00–9.20] μmol/L vs 2.00 [1.40–3.50] μmol/L, P < .001). The negative predictive value in ruling out an anastomotic leakage were 0.96 on postoperative day 3 and 0.97 on postoperative day 5 for bile acid alone.

Conclusion

Drainage bile acid has a high negative predictive value in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage and showed potential to allow for safe discharge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical-site infections and adherence to evidence-based guidelines Evaluating the value of chemokine receptor type 4–targeted PET imaging in diagnosing primary aldosteronism lateralization: A comparison with adrenal venous sampling Home care visits: The key to reducing loss to follow-up in emergency colorectal surgery Advancing the understanding of conversional and revisional metabolic bariatric surgery outcomes on obstructive sleep apnea. Letter to editor: "Localized hepatocellular carcinoma: Is liver-directed therapy alone as efficacious as surgical resection?"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1