Julie M. Petersen , Jaimie L. Gradus , Martha M. Werler , Samantha E. Parker
{"title":"利用决策树学习方法探讨腹裂的潜在危险因素。","authors":"Julie M. Petersen , Jaimie L. Gradus , Martha M. Werler , Samantha E. Parker","doi":"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite a wealth of research, the etiology of the abdominal wall defect gastroschisis remains largely unknown. The strongest known risk factor is young maternal age. Our objective was to conduct a hypothesis-generating analysis regarding gastroschisis etiology using random forests.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from the Slone Birth Defects Study (case-control, United States and Canada, 1998–2015). Cases were gastroschisis-affected pregnancies (n = 273); controls were live-born infants, frequency-matched by center (n = 2591). Potential risk factor data were ascertained via standardized interviews. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using targeted maximum likelihood estimation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The strongest associations were observed with young maternal age (aOR 3.4, 95 % CI 2.9, 4.0) and prepregnancy body-mass-index < 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (aOR 3.3, 95 % CI 2.4, 4.5). More moderate increased odds were observed for parents not in a relationship, non-Black maternal race, young paternal age, marijuana use, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, lower parity, oral contraceptive use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, daily fast food/processed foods intake, lower poly- or monounsaturated fat, higher total fat, and lower parental education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our research provides support for established risk factors and suggested novel factors (e.g., certain aspects of diet), which warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50767,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Epidemiology","volume":"101 ","pages":"Pages 19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of potential risk factors for gastroschisis using decision tree learning\",\"authors\":\"Julie M. Petersen , Jaimie L. Gradus , Martha M. Werler , Samantha E. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Despite a wealth of research, the etiology of the abdominal wall defect gastroschisis remains largely unknown. The strongest known risk factor is young maternal age. Our objective was to conduct a hypothesis-generating analysis regarding gastroschisis etiology using random forests.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were from the Slone Birth Defects Study (case-control, United States and Canada, 1998–2015). Cases were gastroschisis-affected pregnancies (n = 273); controls were live-born infants, frequency-matched by center (n = 2591). Potential risk factor data were ascertained via standardized interviews. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using targeted maximum likelihood estimation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The strongest associations were observed with young maternal age (aOR 3.4, 95 % CI 2.9, 4.0) and prepregnancy body-mass-index < 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (aOR 3.3, 95 % CI 2.4, 4.5). More moderate increased odds were observed for parents not in a relationship, non-Black maternal race, young paternal age, marijuana use, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, lower parity, oral contraceptive use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, daily fast food/processed foods intake, lower poly- or monounsaturated fat, higher total fat, and lower parental education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our research provides support for established risk factors and suggested novel factors (e.g., certain aspects of diet), which warrant further investigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724002746\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279724002746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管有大量的研究,腹壁缺损胃裂的病因仍不清楚。已知最强的危险因素是年轻的产妇年龄。我们的目的是利用随机森林对胃裂的病因进行假设生成分析。方法:数据来自Slone出生缺陷研究(病例对照,美国和加拿大,1998-2015年)。病例为腹裂妊娠(n=273);对照组为活产婴儿,与中心频率匹配(n=2591)。通过标准化访谈确定潜在风险因素数据。我们使用目标最大似然估计计算调整优势比(aOR)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:观察到最强的相关性与年轻的母亲年龄(aOR 3.4, 95% CI 2.9, 4.0)和孕前体重指数2 (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 2.4, 4.5)。在没有关系的父母、非黑人母亲种族、父亲年龄小、使用大麻、吸烟、饮酒、低胎次、口服避孕药使用、非甾体抗炎药使用、每日快餐/加工食品摄入、低多不饱和脂肪或单不饱和脂肪、高总脂肪和父母受教育程度较低的情况下,观察到更适度的增加几率。结论:我们的研究为已确定的风险因素和建议的新因素(如饮食的某些方面)提供了支持,这些因素值得进一步调查。
An exploration of potential risk factors for gastroschisis using decision tree learning
Purpose
Despite a wealth of research, the etiology of the abdominal wall defect gastroschisis remains largely unknown. The strongest known risk factor is young maternal age. Our objective was to conduct a hypothesis-generating analysis regarding gastroschisis etiology using random forests.
Methods
Data were from the Slone Birth Defects Study (case-control, United States and Canada, 1998–2015). Cases were gastroschisis-affected pregnancies (n = 273); controls were live-born infants, frequency-matched by center (n = 2591). Potential risk factor data were ascertained via standardized interviews. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
Results
The strongest associations were observed with young maternal age (aOR 3.4, 95 % CI 2.9, 4.0) and prepregnancy body-mass-index < 30 kg/m2 (aOR 3.3, 95 % CI 2.4, 4.5). More moderate increased odds were observed for parents not in a relationship, non-Black maternal race, young paternal age, marijuana use, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, lower parity, oral contraceptive use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, daily fast food/processed foods intake, lower poly- or monounsaturated fat, higher total fat, and lower parental education.
Conclusions
Our research provides support for established risk factors and suggested novel factors (e.g., certain aspects of diet), which warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
The journal emphasizes the application of epidemiologic methods to issues that affect the distribution and determinants of human illness in diverse contexts. Its primary focus is on chronic and acute conditions of diverse etiologies and of major importance to clinical medicine, public health, and health care delivery.