The role of eosinophil counts and megakaryocyte nuclei for distinction of acute and chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

Objective: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), the most common cause of thrombocytopenia, is clinically classified as acute and chronic. This study aimed to distinguish between acute/chronic ITP parameters examined at diagnosis via complete blood count (CBC), peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) smears. It would also contribute to early treatment options, cost-effective policies, and the life quality of patients.

Methods: This study consisted of 304 ITP patients aged under 18 years diagnosed and followed up between 1982-2018. Differences between acute and chronic groups were compared by eosinophilia, megakaryocytes (MKs), and megakaryocyte nuclei. Diagnostic scales were created using simple parameters both to guide the distinction between acute and chronic ITP as well as for the prediction of the chronic progression of the patients at diagnosis.

Results: Of the patients in this study, 71% had acute and 29% had chronic ITP. In CBC and PB smears, eosinophil and lymphocyte counts were higher in acute whereas neutrophil counts were higher in chronic ITP patients. Eosinophil counts in the BMA were also significantly higher in acute ITP patients. There was no significant difference in MK counts. However, the mean number of MK nuclei was higher in acute ITP patients.

Conclusion: Comparison analyses between acute/chronic ITP with the methods developed for the first time are low-cost and promising. Using only eosinophil percentages in the CBC and PB smear, we could identify acute cases by 100%. Further studies including the integration of our study and clinical risk scoring models would contribute to the diagnosis and treatment process of ITP.