抗癌药物药代动力学的性别差异:系统综述。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY ESMO Open Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002
J Delahousse, A D Wagner, S Borchmann, A A Adjei, J Haanen, F Burgers, A Letsch, A Quaas, S Oertelt-Prigione, B C Özdemir, R H A Verhoeven, O Della Pasqua, A Paci, O Mir
{"title":"抗癌药物药代动力学的性别差异:系统综述。","authors":"J Delahousse, A D Wagner, S Borchmann, A A Adjei, J Haanen, F Burgers, A Letsch, A Quaas, S Oertelt-Prigione, B C Özdemir, R H A Verhoeven, O Della Pasqua, A Paci, O Mir","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to the effect of body weight, a patient's sex can influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer agents, and thereby their activity and safety. The magnitude and relevance of sex differences, however, are currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic review of published studies (clinical, n ≥ 10) on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (on 31 January 2022) anticancer drugs (excluding hormonal agents), aiming to identify significant PK differences between male and female patients. A difference of ≥20% on PK parameters (clearance or trough concentration) was considered significant. The methodological quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA2020 guidelines and a previously published protocol, which was registered in the PROSPERO database (number 291008).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 99 anticancer agents (for a total of 1643 abstracts and European Medicines Agency/FDA documents) were screened. The final dataset included 112 articles and 8 European Medicines Agency/FDA documents. The median size of a study cohort was 445 patients (range: 12-6468 patients). Significant PK differences (>+20% in clearance or apparent clearance in women) were identified for 14 drugs, and potentially significant PK differences (due to conflicting reports) for another 8 drugs. None of the studies included sex-based summaries to assess whether the observed differences in PK may impact the efficacy or safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant sex differences in PK have been identified including commonly used drugs of different classes, such as 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, regorafenib, atezolizumab, and temozolomide. The risk-benefit ratio for such anticancer drugs is likely to be improved by the development of sex-specific dosing strategies. Additional sex-based PK-pharmacodynamic analyses are recommended during dose optimisation and are to be conducted in line with the FDA Project Optimus guidance. They should be reported even if no association between the patients' sex and the activity and/or toxicity of an anticancer drug has been identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"9 12","pages":"104002"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"J Delahousse, A D Wagner, S Borchmann, A A Adjei, J Haanen, F Burgers, A Letsch, A Quaas, S Oertelt-Prigione, B C Özdemir, R H A Verhoeven, O Della Pasqua, A Paci, O Mir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to the effect of body weight, a patient's sex can influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer agents, and thereby their activity and safety. The magnitude and relevance of sex differences, however, are currently unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a systematic review of published studies (clinical, n ≥ 10) on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (on 31 January 2022) anticancer drugs (excluding hormonal agents), aiming to identify significant PK differences between male and female patients. A difference of ≥20% on PK parameters (clearance or trough concentration) was considered significant. The methodological quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA2020 guidelines and a previously published protocol, which was registered in the PROSPERO database (number 291008).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on 99 anticancer agents (for a total of 1643 abstracts and European Medicines Agency/FDA documents) were screened. The final dataset included 112 articles and 8 European Medicines Agency/FDA documents. The median size of a study cohort was 445 patients (range: 12-6468 patients). Significant PK differences (>+20% in clearance or apparent clearance in women) were identified for 14 drugs, and potentially significant PK differences (due to conflicting reports) for another 8 drugs. None of the studies included sex-based summaries to assess whether the observed differences in PK may impact the efficacy or safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant sex differences in PK have been identified including commonly used drugs of different classes, such as 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, regorafenib, atezolizumab, and temozolomide. The risk-benefit ratio for such anticancer drugs is likely to be improved by the development of sex-specific dosing strategies. Additional sex-based PK-pharmacodynamic analyses are recommended during dose optimisation and are to be conducted in line with the FDA Project Optimus guidance. They should be reported even if no association between the patients' sex and the activity and/or toxicity of an anticancer drug has been identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Open\",\"volume\":\"9 12\",\"pages\":\"104002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除了体重的影响外,患者的性别也会影响抗癌药物的药代动力学(PK),从而影响其活性和安全性。然而,性别差异的大小和相关性目前尚不清楚。方法:我们对美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)于2022年1月31日批准的抗癌药物(不包括激素药物)已发表的研究(临床,n≥10)进行了系统综述,旨在确定男性和女性患者之间的显著PK差异。PK参数(间隙或谷浓度)差异≥20%;采用美国国立卫生研究院研究质量评估工具评估方法学质量。该系统评价是根据PRISMA2020指南和先前发表的方案进行的,该方案已在PROSPERO数据库中注册(编号291008)。结果:筛选了99种抗癌药物的数据(共1643篇摘要和欧洲药品管理局/FDA文件)。最终的数据集包括112篇文章和8份欧洲药品管理局/FDA文件。研究队列的中位数为445例患者(范围:12-6468例)。在14种药物中发现了显著的PK差异(女性清除率为bb0 +20%),在另外8种药物中发现了潜在的显著PK差异(由于相互矛盾的报道)。没有一项研究包括基于性别的总结,以评估观察到的PK差异是否会影响疗效或安全性。结论:包括5-氟尿嘧啶、阿霉素、紫杉醇、瑞非尼、阿特唑单抗、替莫唑胺等不同类别的常用药物,在PK方面存在显著的性别差异。这类抗癌药物的风险收益比可能会随着性别特异性给药策略的发展而提高。建议在剂量优化期间进行额外的基于性别的pk药效学分析,并根据FDA项目Optimus指导进行。即使尚未确定患者的性别与抗癌药物的活性和/或毒性之间存在关联,也应报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review.

Background: In addition to the effect of body weight, a patient's sex can influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anticancer agents, and thereby their activity and safety. The magnitude and relevance of sex differences, however, are currently unclear.

Methods: We carried out a systematic review of published studies (clinical, n ≥ 10) on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (on 31 January 2022) anticancer drugs (excluding hormonal agents), aiming to identify significant PK differences between male and female patients. A difference of ≥20% on PK parameters (clearance or trough concentration) was considered significant. The methodological quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tool. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA2020 guidelines and a previously published protocol, which was registered in the PROSPERO database (number 291008).

Results: Data on 99 anticancer agents (for a total of 1643 abstracts and European Medicines Agency/FDA documents) were screened. The final dataset included 112 articles and 8 European Medicines Agency/FDA documents. The median size of a study cohort was 445 patients (range: 12-6468 patients). Significant PK differences (>+20% in clearance or apparent clearance in women) were identified for 14 drugs, and potentially significant PK differences (due to conflicting reports) for another 8 drugs. None of the studies included sex-based summaries to assess whether the observed differences in PK may impact the efficacy or safety profile.

Conclusions: Significant sex differences in PK have been identified including commonly used drugs of different classes, such as 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, regorafenib, atezolizumab, and temozolomide. The risk-benefit ratio for such anticancer drugs is likely to be improved by the development of sex-specific dosing strategies. Additional sex-based PK-pharmacodynamic analyses are recommended during dose optimisation and are to be conducted in line with the FDA Project Optimus guidance. They should be reported even if no association between the patients' sex and the activity and/or toxicity of an anticancer drug has been identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESMO Open
ESMO Open Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
255
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research. ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO. Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.
期刊最新文献
Association between DNA damage repair alterations and outcomes to 177Lu-PSMA-617 in advanced prostate cancer. BRCA functional domains associated with high risk of multiple primary tumors and domain-related sensitivity to olaparib: the Prometheus Study. Treatment with infliximab and tacrolimus in steroid-refractory pneumonitis secondary to anti-HER2 therapy. Factors associated with first-to-second-line attrition among patients with metastatic breast cancer in the real world. Follow-up after first-Line nivOlumab plus ipilimumab in patients with diffuse pleuRal mesotheliomA: a real-world Dutch cohort study-FLORA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1