15种芳基、苄基和脂肪环n -亚硝胺的Ames诱变性。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105763
Ayako Furuhama , Kei-ichi Sugiyama , Masamitsu Honma
{"title":"15种芳基、苄基和脂肪环n -亚硝胺的Ames诱变性。","authors":"Ayako Furuhama ,&nbsp;Kei-ichi Sugiyama ,&nbsp;Masamitsu Honma","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Ames mutagenicity test is an effective means of screening compounds for their carcinogenic potential. Here, we conducted Ames tests on 15 aryl, benzyl, and aliphatic ring <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. Then, by using two indicators of mutagenicity strength calculated from the Ames test results, namely, maximum specific activity (MSA; number of revertant colonies) and maximum fold increase (MFI; relative ratio of increased colonies), we examined the relationship between Ames mutagenicity strength and Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach (CPCA) potency category, which is a structure–activity-relationship–based prediction of the carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines. Eleven of the test compounds were Ames positive and four were negative. Of the 11 positive compounds, three were categorized as strong positive (MSA ≥1000), five as medium positive (100 ≤ MSA &lt;1000), and three as weak positive (MSA &lt;100). The compounds with an aliphatic ring showed a negative relationship between mutagenicity strength (i.e., MSA or MFI) and carcinogenic potential (i.e., CPCA category), whereas, the alpha-methyl aryl <em>N</em>-nitrosamines did not. Overall, <span>MSA</span> and <span>MFI</span> were found to be detailed indicators of the carcinogenic potency of the <em>N</em>-nitrosamines and can potentially be used to support CPCA categorization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ames mutagenicity of 15 aryl, benzyl, and aliphatic ring N-nitrosamines\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Furuhama ,&nbsp;Kei-ichi Sugiyama ,&nbsp;Masamitsu Honma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Ames mutagenicity test is an effective means of screening compounds for their carcinogenic potential. Here, we conducted Ames tests on 15 aryl, benzyl, and aliphatic ring <em>N</em>-nitrosamines. Then, by using two indicators of mutagenicity strength calculated from the Ames test results, namely, maximum specific activity (MSA; number of revertant colonies) and maximum fold increase (MFI; relative ratio of increased colonies), we examined the relationship between Ames mutagenicity strength and Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach (CPCA) potency category, which is a structure–activity-relationship–based prediction of the carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines. Eleven of the test compounds were Ames positive and four were negative. Of the 11 positive compounds, three were categorized as strong positive (MSA ≥1000), five as medium positive (100 ≤ MSA &lt;1000), and three as weak positive (MSA &lt;100). The compounds with an aliphatic ring showed a negative relationship between mutagenicity strength (i.e., MSA or MFI) and carcinogenic potential (i.e., CPCA category), whereas, the alpha-methyl aryl <em>N</em>-nitrosamines did not. Overall, <span>MSA</span> and <span>MFI</span> were found to be detailed indicators of the carcinogenic potency of the <em>N</em>-nitrosamines and can potentially be used to support CPCA categorization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024002046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024002046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Ames诱变试验是筛选化合物致癌潜力的有效手段。在这里,我们对15个芳基、苄基和脂肪环n -亚硝胺进行了Ames测试。然后,利用Ames试验结果计算的两个致突变性强度指标,即最大比活性(MSA);复归菌落数)和最大倍数增加(MFI;),我们研究了Ames诱变强度与致癌效能分类方法(Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach, CPCA)效能类别之间的关系,CPCA是一种基于结构-活性关系的亚硝胺致癌效能预测方法。11个测试化合物为Ames阳性,4个为阴性。11个阳性化合物中,3个为强阳性(MSA≥1000),5个为中阳性(100≤MSA < 1000), 3个为弱阳性(MSA < 100)。含有脂肪环的化合物在致突变性强度(即MSA或MFI)和致癌潜力(即CPCA类别)之间呈负相关,而α -甲基芳基n -亚硝胺则没有。总的来说,MSA和MFI是n -亚硝胺致癌性的详细指标,可能用于支持CPCA分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ames mutagenicity of 15 aryl, benzyl, and aliphatic ring N-nitrosamines
The Ames mutagenicity test is an effective means of screening compounds for their carcinogenic potential. Here, we conducted Ames tests on 15 aryl, benzyl, and aliphatic ring N-nitrosamines. Then, by using two indicators of mutagenicity strength calculated from the Ames test results, namely, maximum specific activity (MSA; number of revertant colonies) and maximum fold increase (MFI; relative ratio of increased colonies), we examined the relationship between Ames mutagenicity strength and Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach (CPCA) potency category, which is a structure–activity-relationship–based prediction of the carcinogenic potency of nitrosamines. Eleven of the test compounds were Ames positive and four were negative. Of the 11 positive compounds, three were categorized as strong positive (MSA ≥1000), five as medium positive (100 ≤ MSA <1000), and three as weak positive (MSA <100). The compounds with an aliphatic ring showed a negative relationship between mutagenicity strength (i.e., MSA or MFI) and carcinogenic potential (i.e., CPCA category), whereas, the alpha-methyl aryl N-nitrosamines did not. Overall, MSA and MFI were found to be detailed indicators of the carcinogenic potency of the N-nitrosamines and can potentially be used to support CPCA categorization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods Accurate regulatory classification of chemical respiratory allergens: The case for robust characterisation of causation Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances Editorial Board Toxicological evaluation of vanadium and derivation of a parenteral tolerable intake value for medical devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1