长期护理和康复的门诊环境中的抗凝管理-一项多中心描述性试点研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Thrombosis research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109238
Maria Macoviciuc , Christina Furneri , Léa Callens , Bao Ling Wei , Helen Mantzanis , Nikki Kampouris , Maral Koolian , Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé , Ryan S. Kerzner
{"title":"长期护理和康复的门诊环境中的抗凝管理-一项多中心描述性试点研究。","authors":"Maria Macoviciuc ,&nbsp;Christina Furneri ,&nbsp;Léa Callens ,&nbsp;Bao Ling Wei ,&nbsp;Helen Mantzanis ,&nbsp;Nikki Kampouris ,&nbsp;Maral Koolian ,&nbsp;Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé ,&nbsp;Ryan S. Kerzner","doi":"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anticoagulants have consistently emerged as the leading cause of adverse drug events in both inpatient and outpatient settings. While literature on anticoagulation stewardship programs (ACSP) exists for hospital settings, there is a paucity of data in long-term care and rehabilitation settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Assess the feasibility of a pharmacist led ACSP in the ambulatory healthcare settings of long-term care facilities (LTC) and rehabilitation centers (RC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective pilot project in 3 rehabilitation centers and 7 long-term care facilities. Patients were selected over 5 months in 2023. Patient and anticoagulant prescription-related characteristics were collected. The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of anticoagulant prescription reviews leading to a pharmacist intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 411 patients were enrolled. Common indications for anticoagulants were atrial fibrillation (<em>n</em> = 255, 62.0 %), medical thromboprophylaxis (<em>n</em> = 52, 12.7 %) and venous thromboembolism (<em>n</em> = 53, 12.9 %). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were most frequently prescribed (<em>n</em> = 309, 75.2 %). Of 411 prescription reviews, 93 led to at least one intervention (22.6 %), for a total of 100 interventions. Interventions mainly concerned laboratory ordering (<em>n</em> = 29) and DOAC dose adjustment (<em>n</em> = 24). Baseline anticoagulant characteristics and outcomes varied by healthcare setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Expanding ACSP into outpatient LTC and RC settings is feasible. ACSP should include both therapeutic and thromboprophylactic anticoagulants. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the viability of ongoing ACSP monitoring, and more extensive prospective studies are required to assess clinical outcomes effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23064,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis research","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 109238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticoagulation stewardship in the ambulatory settings of long-term care and rehabilitation - A multi-centric descriptive pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Maria Macoviciuc ,&nbsp;Christina Furneri ,&nbsp;Léa Callens ,&nbsp;Bao Ling Wei ,&nbsp;Helen Mantzanis ,&nbsp;Nikki Kampouris ,&nbsp;Maral Koolian ,&nbsp;Vincent Dagenais-Beaulé ,&nbsp;Ryan S. Kerzner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anticoagulants have consistently emerged as the leading cause of adverse drug events in both inpatient and outpatient settings. While literature on anticoagulation stewardship programs (ACSP) exists for hospital settings, there is a paucity of data in long-term care and rehabilitation settings.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Assess the feasibility of a pharmacist led ACSP in the ambulatory healthcare settings of long-term care facilities (LTC) and rehabilitation centers (RC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective pilot project in 3 rehabilitation centers and 7 long-term care facilities. Patients were selected over 5 months in 2023. Patient and anticoagulant prescription-related characteristics were collected. The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of anticoagulant prescription reviews leading to a pharmacist intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 411 patients were enrolled. Common indications for anticoagulants were atrial fibrillation (<em>n</em> = 255, 62.0 %), medical thromboprophylaxis (<em>n</em> = 52, 12.7 %) and venous thromboembolism (<em>n</em> = 53, 12.9 %). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were most frequently prescribed (<em>n</em> = 309, 75.2 %). Of 411 prescription reviews, 93 led to at least one intervention (22.6 %), for a total of 100 interventions. Interventions mainly concerned laboratory ordering (<em>n</em> = 29) and DOAC dose adjustment (<em>n</em> = 24). Baseline anticoagulant characteristics and outcomes varied by healthcare setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Expanding ACSP into outpatient LTC and RC settings is feasible. ACSP should include both therapeutic and thromboprophylactic anticoagulants. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the viability of ongoing ACSP monitoring, and more extensive prospective studies are required to assess clinical outcomes effectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"volume\":\"245 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824003700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384824003700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在住院和门诊环境中,抗凝剂一直是药物不良事件的主要原因。虽然关于医院设置抗凝管理程序(ACSP)的文献存在,但缺乏长期护理和康复设置的数据。目的:评估药剂师领导的ACSP在长期护理机构(LTC)和康复中心(RC)门诊医疗机构的可行性。方法:在3家康复中心和7家长期护理机构进行前瞻性试点。患者于2023年入选,时间超过5个月。收集患者及抗凝处方相关特征。主要可行性结果是导致药师干预的抗凝处方回顾的比例。结果:共纳入411例患者。抗凝药物的常见适应症是房颤(n = 255, 62.0%)、药物血栓预防(n = 52, 12.7%)和静脉血栓栓塞(n = 53, 12.9%)。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)是最常见的处方(n = 309, 75.2%)。在411项处方审查中,93项导致至少一项干预(22.6%),总共100项干预。干预措施主要涉及实验室排序(n = 29)和DOAC剂量调整(n = 24)。基线抗凝血特性和结果因医疗环境而异。结论:将ACSP扩展到门诊LTC和RC设置是可行的。ACSP应包括治疗和预防血栓的抗凝剂。需要进一步的研究来评估正在进行的ACSP监测的可行性,并且需要更广泛的前瞻性研究来有效评估临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anticoagulation stewardship in the ambulatory settings of long-term care and rehabilitation - A multi-centric descriptive pilot study

Background

Anticoagulants have consistently emerged as the leading cause of adverse drug events in both inpatient and outpatient settings. While literature on anticoagulation stewardship programs (ACSP) exists for hospital settings, there is a paucity of data in long-term care and rehabilitation settings.

Objective

Assess the feasibility of a pharmacist led ACSP in the ambulatory healthcare settings of long-term care facilities (LTC) and rehabilitation centers (RC).

Methods

We conducted a prospective pilot project in 3 rehabilitation centers and 7 long-term care facilities. Patients were selected over 5 months in 2023. Patient and anticoagulant prescription-related characteristics were collected. The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of anticoagulant prescription reviews leading to a pharmacist intervention.

Results

A total of 411 patients were enrolled. Common indications for anticoagulants were atrial fibrillation (n = 255, 62.0 %), medical thromboprophylaxis (n = 52, 12.7 %) and venous thromboembolism (n = 53, 12.9 %). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) were most frequently prescribed (n = 309, 75.2 %). Of 411 prescription reviews, 93 led to at least one intervention (22.6 %), for a total of 100 interventions. Interventions mainly concerned laboratory ordering (n = 29) and DOAC dose adjustment (n = 24). Baseline anticoagulant characteristics and outcomes varied by healthcare setting.

Conclusion

Expanding ACSP into outpatient LTC and RC settings is feasible. ACSP should include both therapeutic and thromboprophylactic anticoagulants. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the viability of ongoing ACSP monitoring, and more extensive prospective studies are required to assess clinical outcomes effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thrombosis research
Thrombosis research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
364
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Thrombosis Research is an international journal dedicated to the swift dissemination of new information on thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular biology, aimed at advancing both science and clinical care. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research, reviews, editorials, opinions, and critiques, covering both basic and clinical studies. Priority is given to research that promises novel approaches in the diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, and prevention of thrombotic and hemorrhagic diseases.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board In vitro procoagulant effects of Gla-domainless factor Xa in factor XI-deficient and factor IX-deficient plasma Association between anticoagulant-related bleeding and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies and cancer-associated venous thromboembolism Mitochondrial DNA copy number and its association with venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer Acquired factor XI deficiency in paediatrics patients: A French series and review of literature cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1