{"title":"不同复合材料在不同固化辐照度下对准器附着精度和表面粗糙度的体外比较研究。","authors":"Servet Erbas, Ezgi Atik","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To evaluate 4 different composite resins in terms of aligner attachment accuracy and surface roughness.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>160 premolars were divided into 4 groups (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->40): Group 1: GC Aligner Connect™; 2: GC Ortho Connect™; 3: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable; 4: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Universal. Each group was divided into 2 equal subgroups regarding curing irradiances (Power of 1000 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> in subgroup A for 10<!--> <!-->s, and 3200 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>in B for 3<!--> <!-->s, VALO™ Cordless-LED Curing Light). The primary objective was to compare the realized attachments with those of the virtual with 3D Geomagic software. A contact surface profiler was used for roughness measurement (Ra) as the secondary aim. The data were analysed using the IBM SPSS 25.0. The significance level was set at <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In subgroup A, the mean “excess” accuracy measurement of the 3M ESPE Filtek ™Z350 XT flowable resin was found to be higher than others. In subgroup B, the “excess” accuracy measurements of the 3M ESPE Filtek™Z350 XT flowable (0.24<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.07<!--> <!-->mm) and Universal (0.26<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.05<!--> <!-->mm) resins were significantly higher than those of the GC Aligner Connect™ resin (0.17<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.06<!--> <!-->mm), (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). According to the Ra measurements in subgroup A, the measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.75<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.09<!--> <!-->μm), GC Ortho Connect™ (0.99<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.04<!--> <!-->μm) and 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (1.33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.16<!--> <!-->μm) resins were found to be higher than of the Universal resin (0.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.11<!--> <!-->μm), (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). In subgroup B, the Ra measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.74<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.81<!--> <!-->μm) was found to be higher than that of the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (0.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18<!--> <!-->μm) resin (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.010). Ra measurement observed for the 10-second curing factor for the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable resin group was found to be significantly higher than for the 3-second curing factor (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In terms of “excess” value of accuracy, 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable composite resin showed a higher value. The lowest surface roughness was observed for Universal restorative resin considering low power irradiation, while was observed for 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable resin considering high power irradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"23 2","pages":"Article 100961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative in vitro study of different composite materials in terms of aligner attachment accuracy and surface roughness using different curing irradiances\",\"authors\":\"Servet Erbas, Ezgi Atik\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To evaluate 4 different composite resins in terms of aligner attachment accuracy and surface roughness.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>160 premolars were divided into 4 groups (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->40): Group 1: GC Aligner Connect™; 2: GC Ortho Connect™; 3: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable; 4: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Universal. Each group was divided into 2 equal subgroups regarding curing irradiances (Power of 1000 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> in subgroup A for 10<!--> <!-->s, and 3200 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>in B for 3<!--> <!-->s, VALO™ Cordless-LED Curing Light). The primary objective was to compare the realized attachments with those of the virtual with 3D Geomagic software. A contact surface profiler was used for roughness measurement (Ra) as the secondary aim. The data were analysed using the IBM SPSS 25.0. The significance level was set at <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In subgroup A, the mean “excess” accuracy measurement of the 3M ESPE Filtek ™Z350 XT flowable resin was found to be higher than others. In subgroup B, the “excess” accuracy measurements of the 3M ESPE Filtek™Z350 XT flowable (0.24<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.07<!--> <!-->mm) and Universal (0.26<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.05<!--> <!-->mm) resins were significantly higher than those of the GC Aligner Connect™ resin (0.17<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.06<!--> <!-->mm), (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). According to the Ra measurements in subgroup A, the measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.75<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.09<!--> <!-->μm), GC Ortho Connect™ (0.99<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.04<!--> <!-->μm) and 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (1.33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.16<!--> <!-->μm) resins were found to be higher than of the Universal resin (0.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.11<!--> <!-->μm), (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05). In subgroup B, the Ra measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.74<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.81<!--> <!-->μm) was found to be higher than that of the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (0.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18<!--> <!-->μm) resin (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.010). Ra measurement observed for the 10-second curing factor for the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable resin group was found to be significantly higher than for the 3-second curing factor (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In terms of “excess” value of accuracy, 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable composite resin showed a higher value. The lowest surface roughness was observed for Universal restorative resin considering low power irradiation, while was observed for 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable resin considering high power irradiation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724001177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722724001177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative in vitro study of different composite materials in terms of aligner attachment accuracy and surface roughness using different curing irradiances
Background
To evaluate 4 different composite resins in terms of aligner attachment accuracy and surface roughness.
Material and methods
160 premolars were divided into 4 groups (n = 40): Group 1: GC Aligner Connect™; 2: GC Ortho Connect™; 3: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable; 4: 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Universal. Each group was divided into 2 equal subgroups regarding curing irradiances (Power of 1000 mW/cm2 in subgroup A for 10 s, and 3200 mW/cm2in B for 3 s, VALO™ Cordless-LED Curing Light). The primary objective was to compare the realized attachments with those of the virtual with 3D Geomagic software. A contact surface profiler was used for roughness measurement (Ra) as the secondary aim. The data were analysed using the IBM SPSS 25.0. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results
In subgroup A, the mean “excess” accuracy measurement of the 3M ESPE Filtek ™Z350 XT flowable resin was found to be higher than others. In subgroup B, the “excess” accuracy measurements of the 3M ESPE Filtek™Z350 XT flowable (0.24 ± 0.07 mm) and Universal (0.26 ± 0.05 mm) resins were significantly higher than those of the GC Aligner Connect™ resin (0.17 ± 0.06 mm), (p < 0.05). According to the Ra measurements in subgroup A, the measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.75 ± 1.09 μm), GC Ortho Connect™ (0.99 ± 1.04 μm) and 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (1.33 ± 1.16 μm) resins were found to be higher than of the Universal resin (0.07 ± 0.11 μm), (p < 0.05). In subgroup B, the Ra measurement of the GC Aligner Connect™ (1.74 ± 1.81 μm) was found to be higher than that of the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable (0.11 ± 0.18 μm) resin (p = 0.010). Ra measurement observed for the 10-second curing factor for the 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT Flowable resin group was found to be significantly higher than for the 3-second curing factor (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In terms of “excess” value of accuracy, 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable composite resin showed a higher value. The lowest surface roughness was observed for Universal restorative resin considering low power irradiation, while was observed for 3M ESPE Filtek™ Z350 XT flowable resin considering high power irradiation.
期刊介绍：
Une revue de référence dans le domaine de orthodontie et des disciplines frontières Your reference in dentofacial orthopedics International Orthodontics adresse aux orthodontistes, aux dentistes, aux stomatologistes, aux chirurgiens maxillo-faciaux et aux plasticiens de la face, ainsi quà leurs assistant(e)s. International Orthodontics is addressed to orthodontists, dentists, stomatologists, maxillofacial surgeons and facial plastic surgeons, as well as their assistants.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
