通过功能灵巧测试评估的手的表现与临床疾病活动相关,但在实现治疗目标的类风湿关节炎患者中仍有改变:一项横断面队列研究

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Musculoskeletal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/msc.70023
Aniela Shouval, Amihai Levkoviz, Shiri Keret, Itzhak Rosner, Irina Rokhyan, Boris Tchalabian, Esther Hof, Gleb Slobodin
{"title":"通过功能灵巧测试评估的手的表现与临床疾病活动相关,但在实现治疗目标的类风湿关节炎患者中仍有改变:一项横断面队列研究","authors":"Aniela Shouval, Amihai Levkoviz, Shiri Keret, Itzhak Rosner, Irina Rokhyan, Boris Tchalabian, Esther Hof, Gleb Slobodin","doi":"10.1002/msc.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Direct hand function is not commonly evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Functional Dexterity Test (FDT) assesses a patient's ability to use the hand for daily tasks and is an accepted quantitative assessment tool in occupational medicine. This pilot study aimed to examine the correlations of FDT-measured hand performance with disease activity status in a cohort of RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients with established RA performed the FDT during their regular follow-up visits. The dominant and non-dominant hands were assessed separately. FDT results were compared among patients with active RA and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) > 10, RA patients achieving controlled disease activity state (CDAI ≤ 10), and 20 volunteers with no rheumatic disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean FDT for the dominant hand was 43 s in active RA, 35 s in controlled RA, and 25 s in persons without arthritis. Corresponding FDT results for the non-dominant hand were 50, 38, and 29 s, respectively. FDT significantly correlated with CDAI in the entire cohort of RA patients and the subgroup with CDAI > 10. Patients with controlled disease, CDAI ≤ 10, still demonstrated significantly reduced hand performance compared with non-rheumatic controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FDT is a sensitive tool for assessing rheumatoid hand function. Reduced hand performance by FDT in many RA patients who have already achieved existing treatment goals speaks to the question of the suitability of direct hand performance assessment as an RA outcome measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"22 4","pages":"e70023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hand Performance Assessed by Functional Dexterity Test Correlates With Clinical Disease Activity but Remains Altered in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Achieving Treatment Goals: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Aniela Shouval, Amihai Levkoviz, Shiri Keret, Itzhak Rosner, Irina Rokhyan, Boris Tchalabian, Esther Hof, Gleb Slobodin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Direct hand function is not commonly evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Functional Dexterity Test (FDT) assesses a patient's ability to use the hand for daily tasks and is an accepted quantitative assessment tool in occupational medicine. This pilot study aimed to examine the correlations of FDT-measured hand performance with disease activity status in a cohort of RA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients with established RA performed the FDT during their regular follow-up visits. The dominant and non-dominant hands were assessed separately. FDT results were compared among patients with active RA and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) > 10, RA patients achieving controlled disease activity state (CDAI ≤ 10), and 20 volunteers with no rheumatic disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean FDT for the dominant hand was 43 s in active RA, 35 s in controlled RA, and 25 s in persons without arthritis. Corresponding FDT results for the non-dominant hand were 50, 38, and 29 s, respectively. FDT significantly correlated with CDAI in the entire cohort of RA patients and the subgroup with CDAI > 10. Patients with controlled disease, CDAI ≤ 10, still demonstrated significantly reduced hand performance compared with non-rheumatic controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FDT is a sensitive tool for assessing rheumatoid hand function. Reduced hand performance by FDT in many RA patients who have already achieved existing treatment goals speaks to the question of the suitability of direct hand performance assessment as an RA outcome measure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"e70023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者通常不评估直接手功能。功能灵巧测试(FDT)评估患者使用手进行日常任务的能力,是职业医学中公认的定量评估工具。本初步研究旨在检查fdt测量的手部功能与RA患者疾病活动状态的相关性。方法:48例已确诊的RA患者在定期随访期间进行FDT。优势手和非优势手分别进行评估。比较活动期RA患者的FDT结果与临床疾病活动指数(CDAI) bbb10、达到疾病活动状态控制(CDAI≤10)的RA患者和20名无风湿病的志愿者。结果:活动性RA的优势手平均FDT为43 s,控制性RA为35 s,无关节炎者为25 s。非优势手对应的FDT结果分别为50,38和29s。在整个RA患者队列和CDAI亚组中,FDT与CDAI显著相关[10]。与非风湿病对照组相比,CDAI≤10的疾病控制患者仍表现出明显的手部功能下降。结论:FDT是评估类风湿手功能的灵敏工具。FDT降低了许多已经达到现有治疗目标的RA患者的手部功能,这说明了直接手部功能评估作为RA结果测量的适用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hand Performance Assessed by Functional Dexterity Test Correlates With Clinical Disease Activity but Remains Altered in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Achieving Treatment Goals: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.

Objectives: Direct hand function is not commonly evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Functional Dexterity Test (FDT) assesses a patient's ability to use the hand for daily tasks and is an accepted quantitative assessment tool in occupational medicine. This pilot study aimed to examine the correlations of FDT-measured hand performance with disease activity status in a cohort of RA patients.

Methods: Forty-eight patients with established RA performed the FDT during their regular follow-up visits. The dominant and non-dominant hands were assessed separately. FDT results were compared among patients with active RA and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) > 10, RA patients achieving controlled disease activity state (CDAI ≤ 10), and 20 volunteers with no rheumatic disease.

Results: Mean FDT for the dominant hand was 43 s in active RA, 35 s in controlled RA, and 25 s in persons without arthritis. Corresponding FDT results for the non-dominant hand were 50, 38, and 29 s, respectively. FDT significantly correlated with CDAI in the entire cohort of RA patients and the subgroup with CDAI > 10. Patients with controlled disease, CDAI ≤ 10, still demonstrated significantly reduced hand performance compared with non-rheumatic controls.

Conclusions: FDT is a sensitive tool for assessing rheumatoid hand function. Reduced hand performance by FDT in many RA patients who have already achieved existing treatment goals speaks to the question of the suitability of direct hand performance assessment as an RA outcome measure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
期刊最新文献
Pain Catastrophizing Is Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Gaps in Evidence-Based Recommendations for Low Back Pain: Analysis of the Accuracy of the Care Pathway in Primary Care. Knee-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Young Adults: A Scoping Meta-Review. Effect of Motivational Interviewing and Exercise on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Perspectives of UK Physiotherapists With Expertise in Rheumatology on the Barriers and Facilitators Influencing the Identification of Axial Spondyloarthritis by First Contact Practitioners in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1