互惠语言风格匹配:治疗关系的指示器或促进者。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644
Tayler M S Colton, Daniel W Cox, Johanna M Mickelson, David Kealy
{"title":"互惠语言风格匹配:治疗关系的指示器或促进者。","authors":"Tayler M S Colton, Daniel W Cox, Johanna M Mickelson, David Kealy","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The tendency to linguistically synchronize is an adaptive and prosocial process observed in verbal and written communication. Research in therapeutic contexts has primarily conceptualized reciprocal language style matching (rLSM; i.e., similarity of function words) as <i>indicating</i> the therapeutic relationship. However, in non-therapeutic contexts, rLSM has been conceptualized as <i>facilitating</i> relationship formation and maintenance. The aim of the present study was to examine if an indication model or facilitation model provided a better explanation for the association between rLSM and the therapeutic bond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online text-based crisis-counseling sessions (<i>N</i> = 350) with clients in suicidal crisis were coded for rLSM and therapeutic bond. To examine and compare the indication and facilitation models, we used random intercept cross-lagged panel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between rLSM and therapeutic bond was better explained by the facilitation model (i.e., rLSM predicting bond) than the indication model (i.e., rLSM co-occurring with bond). However, a model that included (a) rLSM predicting therapeutic bond and (b) the cross-sectional association between therapeutic bond and rLSM was the best fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that rLSM may play a role in establishing the therapeutic relationship and be reflective of the client-counselor relationship. Implications for counseling practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reciprocal language style matching: Indicator or facilitator of therapeutic bond.\",\"authors\":\"Tayler M S Colton, Daniel W Cox, Johanna M Mickelson, David Kealy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The tendency to linguistically synchronize is an adaptive and prosocial process observed in verbal and written communication. Research in therapeutic contexts has primarily conceptualized reciprocal language style matching (rLSM; i.e., similarity of function words) as <i>indicating</i> the therapeutic relationship. However, in non-therapeutic contexts, rLSM has been conceptualized as <i>facilitating</i> relationship formation and maintenance. The aim of the present study was to examine if an indication model or facilitation model provided a better explanation for the association between rLSM and the therapeutic bond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online text-based crisis-counseling sessions (<i>N</i> = 350) with clients in suicidal crisis were coded for rLSM and therapeutic bond. To examine and compare the indication and facilitation models, we used random intercept cross-lagged panel models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The association between rLSM and therapeutic bond was better explained by the facilitation model (i.e., rLSM predicting bond) than the indication model (i.e., rLSM co-occurring with bond). However, a model that included (a) rLSM predicting therapeutic bond and (b) the cross-sectional association between therapeutic bond and rLSM was the best fit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that rLSM may play a role in establishing the therapeutic relationship and be reflective of the client-counselor relationship. Implications for counseling practice are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2437644","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:语言同步倾向是在口头和书面交际中观察到的一种适应性和亲社会过程。在治疗背景下的研究主要概念化了相互语言风格匹配(rLSM;即虚词的相似性)表明治疗关系。然而,在非治疗背景下,rLSM被概念化为促进关系的形成和维持。本研究的目的是检验指征模型或促进模型是否能更好地解释rLSM与治疗结合之间的关系。方法:对350例自杀危机患者的在线文本危机咨询进行rLSM和治疗联系编码。为了检验和比较指示和促进模型,我们使用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型。结果:促进模型(即rLSM预测结合)比适应症模型(即rLSM与结合共存)更能解释rLSM与治疗结合之间的关系。然而,包括(a) rLSM预测治疗结合和(b)治疗结合与rLSM之间的横断面关联的模型是最合适的。结论:我们的研究结果表明,rLSM可能在建立治疗关系中起作用,并反映了咨客关系。对咨询实践的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reciprocal language style matching: Indicator or facilitator of therapeutic bond.

Objective: The tendency to linguistically synchronize is an adaptive and prosocial process observed in verbal and written communication. Research in therapeutic contexts has primarily conceptualized reciprocal language style matching (rLSM; i.e., similarity of function words) as indicating the therapeutic relationship. However, in non-therapeutic contexts, rLSM has been conceptualized as facilitating relationship formation and maintenance. The aim of the present study was to examine if an indication model or facilitation model provided a better explanation for the association between rLSM and the therapeutic bond.

Methods: Online text-based crisis-counseling sessions (N = 350) with clients in suicidal crisis were coded for rLSM and therapeutic bond. To examine and compare the indication and facilitation models, we used random intercept cross-lagged panel models.

Results: The association between rLSM and therapeutic bond was better explained by the facilitation model (i.e., rLSM predicting bond) than the indication model (i.e., rLSM co-occurring with bond). However, a model that included (a) rLSM predicting therapeutic bond and (b) the cross-sectional association between therapeutic bond and rLSM was the best fit.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that rLSM may play a role in establishing the therapeutic relationship and be reflective of the client-counselor relationship. Implications for counseling practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
期刊最新文献
"I know that all this is me" Pathways of change in complex dissociative disorder. Emotion cascade: Harnessing emotional sequences to enhance chair work interventions and reduce self-criticism. Personalization of structured group psychotherapy through add-on interventions: A potential for active engagement. Maintaining relevance in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A novel approach to discerning between effective vs. ineffective discourse correlated with better session outcomes. "Vulnerability can breed strength": The role of borderline personality disorder severity in movement synchrony among patients with major depressive disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1