种族化经济隔离和环境负担对纽约交通拥堵影响的变化。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1029/2024GH001050
Jenni A. Shearston, Roheeni Saxena, Joan A. Casey, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Markus Hilpert
{"title":"种族化经济隔离和环境负担对纽约交通拥堵影响的变化。","authors":"Jenni A. Shearston,&nbsp;Roheeni Saxena,&nbsp;Joan A. Casey,&nbsp;Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou,&nbsp;Markus Hilpert","doi":"10.1029/2024GH001050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, stay-at-home policies such as New York's (NY) NY on Pause dramatically reduced traffic congestion. Despite high traffic burden in NY's environmental justice communities, this reduction has not been evaluated through an environmental justice lens—our objective in this analysis. We obtained census tract-level traffic congestion data from Google traffic maps hourly for 2018–2020. We defined congestion as the percent of streets in a census tract with heavy traffic (red- or maroon-color). We used the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) to measure racialized economic segregation and the CDC's Environmental Justice Index (EJI) as a measure of combined environmental, social, and chronic disease burden. We divided census tracts into quintiles of ICE and EJI and used linear mixed models stratified by ICE and EJI quintile in an interrupted time series design. Prior to NY on Pause, less marginalized and burdened census tracts (Q5) tended to have higher levels of traffic congestion; during NY on Pause, this trend reversed. For both ICE and EJI, more marginalized and burdened (Q1–Q2 vs. Q4–Q5) tracts had smaller absolute decreases in percent traffic congestion. For example, percent traffic congestion in ICE Q5 decreased by 7.8% (% change: −36.6%), but in Q1, it decreased by 4.2% (% change: −51.7%). NY on Pause, while protecting residents during COVID-19, may have resulted in inequitable reductions in traffic congestion. It is critical that such inequities are measured and acknowledged so that future policies to reduce traffic congestion and respond to pandemics can enhance equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in the Impact of New York on Pause on Traffic Congestion by Racialized Economic Segregation and Environmental Burden\",\"authors\":\"Jenni A. Shearston,&nbsp;Roheeni Saxena,&nbsp;Joan A. Casey,&nbsp;Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou,&nbsp;Markus Hilpert\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024GH001050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>During the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, stay-at-home policies such as New York's (NY) NY on Pause dramatically reduced traffic congestion. Despite high traffic burden in NY's environmental justice communities, this reduction has not been evaluated through an environmental justice lens—our objective in this analysis. We obtained census tract-level traffic congestion data from Google traffic maps hourly for 2018–2020. We defined congestion as the percent of streets in a census tract with heavy traffic (red- or maroon-color). We used the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) to measure racialized economic segregation and the CDC's Environmental Justice Index (EJI) as a measure of combined environmental, social, and chronic disease burden. We divided census tracts into quintiles of ICE and EJI and used linear mixed models stratified by ICE and EJI quintile in an interrupted time series design. Prior to NY on Pause, less marginalized and burdened census tracts (Q5) tended to have higher levels of traffic congestion; during NY on Pause, this trend reversed. For both ICE and EJI, more marginalized and burdened (Q1–Q2 vs. Q4–Q5) tracts had smaller absolute decreases in percent traffic congestion. For example, percent traffic congestion in ICE Q5 decreased by 7.8% (% change: −36.6%), but in Q1, it decreased by 4.2% (% change: −51.7%). NY on Pause, while protecting residents during COVID-19, may have resulted in inequitable reductions in traffic congestion. It is critical that such inequities are measured and acknowledged so that future policies to reduce traffic congestion and respond to pandemics can enhance equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohealth\",\"volume\":\"8 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GH001050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019年冠状病毒大流行期间,纽约暂停纽约等居家政策大大缓解了交通拥堵。尽管纽约环境正义社区的交通负担很高,但这种减少并没有通过环境正义的视角来评估——这是我们在本分析中的目标。我们从谷歌交通地图中获得了2018-2020年每小时的人口普查区交通拥堵数据。我们将拥堵定义为人口普查区交通繁忙的街道百分比(红色或栗色)。我们使用极端集中指数(ICE)来衡量种族化的经济隔离,并使用疾病预防控制中心的环境正义指数(EJI)来衡量环境、社会和慢性疾病负担。我们将人口普查区划分为ICE和EJI的五分位数,并在中断时间序列设计中使用ICE和EJI五分位数分层的线性混合模型。在纽约暂停之前,较少边缘化和负担的人口普查区(Q5)往往有较高的交通拥堵水平;在纽约暂停期间,这一趋势发生了逆转。对于ICE和EJI来说,更边缘化和负担更重的区域(Q1-Q2与Q4-Q5)交通拥堵百分比的绝对下降幅度较小。例如,ICE Q5的交通拥堵百分比下降了7.8%(变化%:-36.6%),但在第一季度,它下降了4.2%(变化%:-51.7%)。“暂停纽约”在COVID-19期间保护居民的同时,可能导致交通拥堵的不公平减少。至关重要的是,必须衡量和承认这种不平等,以便未来减少交通拥堵和应对大流行病的政策能够增进公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variation in the Impact of New York on Pause on Traffic Congestion by Racialized Economic Segregation and Environmental Burden

During the 2019 coronavirus pandemic, stay-at-home policies such as New York's (NY) NY on Pause dramatically reduced traffic congestion. Despite high traffic burden in NY's environmental justice communities, this reduction has not been evaluated through an environmental justice lens—our objective in this analysis. We obtained census tract-level traffic congestion data from Google traffic maps hourly for 2018–2020. We defined congestion as the percent of streets in a census tract with heavy traffic (red- or maroon-color). We used the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) to measure racialized economic segregation and the CDC's Environmental Justice Index (EJI) as a measure of combined environmental, social, and chronic disease burden. We divided census tracts into quintiles of ICE and EJI and used linear mixed models stratified by ICE and EJI quintile in an interrupted time series design. Prior to NY on Pause, less marginalized and burdened census tracts (Q5) tended to have higher levels of traffic congestion; during NY on Pause, this trend reversed. For both ICE and EJI, more marginalized and burdened (Q1–Q2 vs. Q4–Q5) tracts had smaller absolute decreases in percent traffic congestion. For example, percent traffic congestion in ICE Q5 decreased by 7.8% (% change: −36.6%), but in Q1, it decreased by 4.2% (% change: −51.7%). NY on Pause, while protecting residents during COVID-19, may have resulted in inequitable reductions in traffic congestion. It is critical that such inequities are measured and acknowledged so that future policies to reduce traffic congestion and respond to pandemics can enhance equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Proposed Relationships Between Climate, Biological Soil Crusts, Human Health, and in Arid Ecosystems. Physicochemical Properties and Bioreactivity of Sub-10 μm Geogenic Particles: Comparison of Volcanic Ash and Desert Dust. Air Pollution and Cognitive Impairment Among the Chinese Elderly Population: An Analysis of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Access to Healthy Built and Natural Environments and Physical Activity and Screen Time in New Zealand Adolescents: A Geospatial Cross-Sectional Study. Subseasonal Prediction of Heat-Related Mortality in Switzerland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1