抗癫痫药物对癫痫患者认知影响的时间变化评估。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110199
Ömer Karadaş, Javid Shafiyev, Akçay Övünç Karadaş, Uğur Burak Şimşek, Betül Özenç, Özlem Aksoy Özmenek
{"title":"抗癫痫药物对癫痫患者认知影响的时间变化评估。","authors":"Ömer Karadaş, Javid Shafiyev, Akçay Övünç Karadaş, Uğur Burak Şimşek, Betül Özenç, Özlem Aksoy Özmenek","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous studies have been conducted investigating the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on cognitive functions, and the cognitive side effects of some ASMs have been demonstrated. However, data on whether tolerance to these side effects develops over time is insufficient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reversibility of cognitive impairments caused by ASMs in patients, utilizing event-related potentials (ERPs) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The single-center prospective study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2023. This study enrolled participants aged 18 to 50 who had been diagnosed with epilepsy and were planning to commence treatment with an antiseizure medication (ASM). The inclusion criteria comprised individuals aged between 18 and 50 years, with a diagnosis of epilepsy, and who were intending to initiate a new ASM as monotherapy. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals younger than 18 or older than 50 years, those diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, those currently on antiepileptic drugs, and those with cognitive dysfunction or dementia. Before starting treatment, patients were subjected to the MoCA test and ERP measurements by a neurologist. These tests and measurements were repeated at the second and sixth months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study included a cohort of 254 participants with a mean age of 32.6 (±14) years. At the second month after starting treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), zonisamide (ZNS), valproic acid (VPA), and topiramate (TPM), both MoCA and ERP values showed significantly worse cognitive impairment compared to before treatment (p < 0.05). This impairment showed a significant improvement by the sixth month for CBZ, ZNS, and VPA (p < 0.05). Although there was improvement in MoCA and ERP values in patients using TPM, the changes remained statistically significant compared to baseline values (p < 0.05). In patients using levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and lacosamide, cognitive impairment was not statistically significant at either the second or sixth month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the detrimental cognitive effects associated with CBZ, VPA, and ZNS could be reversible. Although some improvement was observed over time with TPM, the absence of significant recovery suggests that additional time may be required for a substantial reversal of these effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"110199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of temporal changes in cognitive effects induced by antiseizure medications in epilepsy patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Karadaş, Javid Shafiyev, Akçay Övünç Karadaş, Uğur Burak Şimşek, Betül Özenç, Özlem Aksoy Özmenek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous studies have been conducted investigating the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on cognitive functions, and the cognitive side effects of some ASMs have been demonstrated. However, data on whether tolerance to these side effects develops over time is insufficient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reversibility of cognitive impairments caused by ASMs in patients, utilizing event-related potentials (ERPs) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The single-center prospective study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2023. This study enrolled participants aged 18 to 50 who had been diagnosed with epilepsy and were planning to commence treatment with an antiseizure medication (ASM). The inclusion criteria comprised individuals aged between 18 and 50 years, with a diagnosis of epilepsy, and who were intending to initiate a new ASM as monotherapy. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals younger than 18 or older than 50 years, those diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, those currently on antiepileptic drugs, and those with cognitive dysfunction or dementia. Before starting treatment, patients were subjected to the MoCA test and ERP measurements by a neurologist. These tests and measurements were repeated at the second and sixth months of treatment.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study included a cohort of 254 participants with a mean age of 32.6 (±14) years. At the second month after starting treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), zonisamide (ZNS), valproic acid (VPA), and topiramate (TPM), both MoCA and ERP values showed significantly worse cognitive impairment compared to before treatment (p < 0.05). This impairment showed a significant improvement by the sixth month for CBZ, ZNS, and VPA (p < 0.05). Although there was improvement in MoCA and ERP values in patients using TPM, the changes remained statistically significant compared to baseline values (p < 0.05). In patients using levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and lacosamide, cognitive impairment was not statistically significant at either the second or sixth month.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the detrimental cognitive effects associated with CBZ, VPA, and ZNS could be reversible. Although some improvement was observed over time with TPM, the absence of significant recovery suggests that additional time may be required for a substantial reversal of these effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"110199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110199\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究抗癫痫药物(asm)对认知功能的影响,并证实了一些抗癫痫药物的认知副作用。然而,关于对这些副作用的耐受性是否随着时间的推移而发展的数据是不充分的。本研究的目的是利用事件相关电位(ERPs)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)测试来评估asm引起的患者认知障碍的可逆性。材料与方法:单中心前瞻性研究于2022年7月至2023年8月进行。本研究招募了年龄在18至50岁之间的被诊断为癫痫并计划开始抗癫痫药物治疗的参与者。纳入标准包括年龄在18至50岁之间,诊断为癫痫,并打算开始新的ASM作为单一疗法的个体。排除标准包括年龄小于18岁或年龄大于50岁的个体、被诊断为心因性非癫痫性发作的个体、目前正在服用抗癫痫药物的个体以及有认知功能障碍或痴呆的个体。在开始治疗前,患者接受由神经科医生进行的MoCA测试和ERP测量。这些测试和测量在治疗的第二个月和第六个月重复。结果:该研究纳入了254名参与者,平均年龄为32.6(±14)岁。在卡马西平(CBZ)、唑尼沙胺(ZNS)、丙戊酸(VPA)和托吡酯(TPM)治疗后第2个月,MoCA和ERP值均显示认知功能损害较治疗前加重(p)。结论:本研究表明CBZ、VPA和ZNS相关的有害认知影响是可逆的。虽然随着时间的推移,观察到一些改善,但没有明显的恢复表明,可能需要更多的时间才能实质性地扭转这些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of temporal changes in cognitive effects induced by antiseizure medications in epilepsy patients.

Objective: Numerous studies have been conducted investigating the effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) on cognitive functions, and the cognitive side effects of some ASMs have been demonstrated. However, data on whether tolerance to these side effects develops over time is insufficient. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reversibility of cognitive impairments caused by ASMs in patients, utilizing event-related potentials (ERPs) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test.

Materials and methods: The single-center prospective study was conducted from July 2022 to August 2023. This study enrolled participants aged 18 to 50 who had been diagnosed with epilepsy and were planning to commence treatment with an antiseizure medication (ASM). The inclusion criteria comprised individuals aged between 18 and 50 years, with a diagnosis of epilepsy, and who were intending to initiate a new ASM as monotherapy. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals younger than 18 or older than 50 years, those diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, those currently on antiepileptic drugs, and those with cognitive dysfunction or dementia. Before starting treatment, patients were subjected to the MoCA test and ERP measurements by a neurologist. These tests and measurements were repeated at the second and sixth months of treatment.

Result: The study included a cohort of 254 participants with a mean age of 32.6 (±14) years. At the second month after starting treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), zonisamide (ZNS), valproic acid (VPA), and topiramate (TPM), both MoCA and ERP values showed significantly worse cognitive impairment compared to before treatment (p < 0.05). This impairment showed a significant improvement by the sixth month for CBZ, ZNS, and VPA (p < 0.05). Although there was improvement in MoCA and ERP values in patients using TPM, the changes remained statistically significant compared to baseline values (p < 0.05). In patients using levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and lacosamide, cognitive impairment was not statistically significant at either the second or sixth month.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the detrimental cognitive effects associated with CBZ, VPA, and ZNS could be reversible. Although some improvement was observed over time with TPM, the absence of significant recovery suggests that additional time may be required for a substantial reversal of these effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
A computer-assisted rehabilitation program improves self-management, cognition, and quality of life in epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial. Caregiving burden for adults with epilepsy and coping strategies, a systematic review. Cognitive and behavioral impact of antiseizure medications, neuromodulation, ketogenic diet, and surgery in lennox-gastaut syndrome: A comprehensive review. Incidence of RINCH in pediatric EMU patients. The attitude of medical students, resident doctors, and nurses toward people with epilepsy: A multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1