Christophe Romanet , Johan Wormser , Marine Cachanado , María Granados Santiago , Gilles Chatellier , Marie Carmen Valenza , François Philippart
{"title":"物理治疗方式对长期COVID患者持续呼吸困难的有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Christophe Romanet , Johan Wormser , Marine Cachanado , María Granados Santiago , Gilles Chatellier , Marie Carmen Valenza , François Philippart","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dyspnoea is often found months and years later in the “long-covid” syndrome, impairing quality of life and further perpetuating anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. Physiotherapy was recommended as a treatment in long-covid, but there is still insufficient evidence on its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, VHL and the Cochrane Library until July 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427464). We selected comparative trials including adults with persistent breathlessness following COVID-19, regardless of the initial severity, for whom physiotherapy was implemented as a treatment for dyspnoea. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed the study quality using the PEDro Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>19 studies that included 1292 adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomised controlled trials and 4 non-randomised controlled trials. As for the rehabilitation modalities, 6 studies used respiratory muscle training, 6 studies used low to moderate intensity rehabilitation, 6 used high intensity rehabilitation and one used passive rehabilitation. The methods used between and within each group differed greatly, leading to an expected high heterogeneity of results. Nethertheless the random-effects model found a significant difference favouring physiotherapy (SMD -0.63, 95 CI [-1.03; −0.24], p < 0.001, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 88 %). Subgroup analysis showed a significant effect in the high intensity rehabilitation group alone, with null heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In people suffering from dyspnoea following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, physiotherapy and especially pulmonary rehabilitation may help alleviate respiratory symptoms. Future studies will need to provide more consistent rehabilitation methods and better descriptions of them so as to reveal clear effects and avoid the confusion caused by using too many rehabilitation modalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of physiotherapy modalities on persisting dyspnoea in long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Christophe Romanet , Johan Wormser , Marine Cachanado , María Granados Santiago , Gilles Chatellier , Marie Carmen Valenza , François Philippart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dyspnoea is often found months and years later in the “long-covid” syndrome, impairing quality of life and further perpetuating anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. Physiotherapy was recommended as a treatment in long-covid, but there is still insufficient evidence on its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, VHL and the Cochrane Library until July 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427464). We selected comparative trials including adults with persistent breathlessness following COVID-19, regardless of the initial severity, for whom physiotherapy was implemented as a treatment for dyspnoea. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed the study quality using the PEDro Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>19 studies that included 1292 adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomised controlled trials and 4 non-randomised controlled trials. As for the rehabilitation modalities, 6 studies used respiratory muscle training, 6 studies used low to moderate intensity rehabilitation, 6 used high intensity rehabilitation and one used passive rehabilitation. The methods used between and within each group differed greatly, leading to an expected high heterogeneity of results. Nethertheless the random-effects model found a significant difference favouring physiotherapy (SMD -0.63, 95 CI [-1.03; −0.24], p < 0.001, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 88 %). Subgroup analysis showed a significant effect in the high intensity rehabilitation group alone, with null heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In people suffering from dyspnoea following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, physiotherapy and especially pulmonary rehabilitation may help alleviate respiratory symptoms. Future studies will need to provide more consistent rehabilitation methods and better descriptions of them so as to reveal clear effects and avoid the confusion caused by using too many rehabilitation modalities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003846\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:“长冠”综合征通常在数月或数年后发现呼吸困难,这会损害生活质量,并进一步加剧焦虑和创伤后应激障碍。物理疗法被推荐作为长期covid的治疗方法,但其有效性仍缺乏证据。方法:到2023年7月,我们在MEDLINE、PEDro、WOS、Scopus、VHL和Cochrane Library (PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023427464)上进行了系统的文献检索。我们选择了比较试验,包括COVID-19后持续呼吸困难的成年人,无论初始严重程度如何,对他们实施物理治疗作为呼吸困难的治疗。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,并使用PEDro量表评估研究质量。结果:19项研究纳入1292名成人,符合纳入标准,其中15项为随机对照试验,4项为非随机对照试验。康复方式方面,6项研究采用呼吸肌训练,6项研究采用中低强度康复,6项研究采用高强度康复,1项研究采用被动康复。每组之间和组内使用的方法差异很大,导致预期结果的高度异质性。然而,随机效应模型发现物理治疗有显著差异(SMD -0.63, 95 CI [-1.03;-0.24], p2 = 88%)。亚组分析显示,仅高强度康复组效果显著,无异质性。结论:在SARS-CoV-2感染后出现呼吸困难的患者中,物理治疗特别是肺部康复可能有助于缓解呼吸道症状。未来的研究需要提供更一致的康复方法和更好的描述,以揭示明确的效果,避免使用过多的康复方式造成的混乱。
Effectiveness of physiotherapy modalities on persisting dyspnoea in long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Dyspnoea is often found months and years later in the “long-covid” syndrome, impairing quality of life and further perpetuating anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. Physiotherapy was recommended as a treatment in long-covid, but there is still insufficient evidence on its effectiveness.
Methods
We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, VHL and the Cochrane Library until July 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427464). We selected comparative trials including adults with persistent breathlessness following COVID-19, regardless of the initial severity, for whom physiotherapy was implemented as a treatment for dyspnoea. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed the study quality using the PEDro Scale.
Results
19 studies that included 1292 adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomised controlled trials and 4 non-randomised controlled trials. As for the rehabilitation modalities, 6 studies used respiratory muscle training, 6 studies used low to moderate intensity rehabilitation, 6 used high intensity rehabilitation and one used passive rehabilitation. The methods used between and within each group differed greatly, leading to an expected high heterogeneity of results. Nethertheless the random-effects model found a significant difference favouring physiotherapy (SMD -0.63, 95 CI [-1.03; −0.24], p < 0.001, I2 = 88 %). Subgroup analysis showed a significant effect in the high intensity rehabilitation group alone, with null heterogeneity.
Conclusion
In people suffering from dyspnoea following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, physiotherapy and especially pulmonary rehabilitation may help alleviate respiratory symptoms. Future studies will need to provide more consistent rehabilitation methods and better descriptions of them so as to reveal clear effects and avoid the confusion caused by using too many rehabilitation modalities.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.