巴西版肢体残疾人参与和自主影响(IPA-Br4)的重测可靠性和内部结构。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152
Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes , Graciandre Almeida Neves , Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas , Daniela Virgínia Vaz
{"title":"巴西版肢体残疾人参与和自主影响(IPA-Br4)的重测可靠性和内部结构。","authors":"Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes ,&nbsp;Graciandre Almeida Neves ,&nbsp;Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas ,&nbsp;Daniela Virgínia Vaz","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes &gt; 0.30 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"Article 101152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability and internal structure of the Brazilian version of the impact on participation and autonomy (IPA-Br4) for individuals with physical disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes ,&nbsp;Graciandre Almeida Neves ,&nbsp;Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas ,&nbsp;Daniela Virgínia Vaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes &gt; 0.30 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:参与被认为是康复的核心成果,需要从重视个人价值和偏好的角度进行适当评估。巴西版的 "参与和自主影响"(IPA-Br4)是从主观角度评估巴西参与情况的唯一适当工具:调查数字版 IPA-Br4 对肢体残疾人的重测可靠性和内部结构(结构有效性和内部一致性):方法:用类内相关系数(ICC)评估重测可靠性,用确证因子分析(CFA)评估结构有效性,用克朗巴赫α评估内部一致性:分别有 30 人(43.25±10.6 岁,63.3% 为女性)和 130 人(47.51±15.73 岁,58.5% 为男性)参加了重复测试信度和结构效度评估。各领域的 ICC 分别为室内自主 = 0.84;家庭角色 = 0.87;社会生活和人际关系 = 0.87;室外自主 = 0.84。四个因子的 CFA 模型显示出适当的拟合度,因子载荷表明所有项目都载入了各自的因子,且幅度大于 0.30(p < 0.05)。所有 Cronbach α 值(内部一致性)均高于 0.82:数字版IPA-Br4具有足够的测试重复可靠性和内部结构,可用于肢体残疾成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Test-retest reliability and internal structure of the Brazilian version of the impact on participation and autonomy (IPA-Br4) for individuals with physical disabilities

Background

Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.

Objective

To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.

Methods

Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.

Results

Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (p < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.

Conclusion

The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.
期刊最新文献
A Brazilian Association of Women´s Health Physical Therapy (ABRAFISM) guideline on the terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and assessment Reply to letter to editor for article: ‘‘Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob).’’ Pain revolution in the public health system: Active coping strategies for chronic pain unit Letter to the editor about the article “Development, reliability, and validity of the mobility assessment scale in hospitalized patients (HMob)” Physical therapy assistance in labor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1