Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes , Graciandre Almeida Neves , Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas , Daniela Virgínia Vaz
{"title":"巴西版肢体残疾人参与和自主影响(IPA-Br4)的重测可靠性和内部结构。","authors":"Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes , Graciandre Almeida Neves , Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas , Daniela Virgínia Vaz","doi":"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (<em>p</em> < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49621,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":"Article 101152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test-retest reliability and internal structure of the Brazilian version of the impact on participation and autonomy (IPA-Br4) for individuals with physical disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Ana Amélia Moraes Antunes , Graciandre Almeida Neves , Bianca Pantuzza Santana Rojas , Daniela Virgínia Vaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (<em>p</em> < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355524005628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Test-retest reliability and internal structure of the Brazilian version of the impact on participation and autonomy (IPA-Br4) for individuals with physical disabilities
Background
Participation is considered a central outcome of rehabilitation and needs to be appropriately assessed from a perspective that values individual values and preferences. The Brazilian version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA-Br4) is the only adequate instrument to assess participation from a subjective perspective in Brazil.
Objective
To investigate the test-retest reliability and internal structure (structural validity and internal consistency) of the digital version of IPA-Br4 for individuals with physical disabilities.
Methods
Test-retest reliability was assessed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), structural validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency with Cronbach α.
Results
Thirty (43.25 ± 10.6 years old, 63.3% female) and 130 (47.51 ± 15.73 years old, 58.5% male) individuals participated in the test-retest reliability and structural validity assessments, respectively. ICCs for each domain were: Autonomy indoors = 0.84; Family role = 0.87; Social life and relationships = 0.87; Autonomy outdoors = 0.84. The CFA model for four factors showed appropriate fit with factor loadings indicating that all items loaded onto their respective factors, with magnitudes > 0.30 (p < 0.05). All Cronbach α values (internal consistency) were above 0.82.
Conclusion
The digital version of IPA-Br4 has adequate test-retest reliability and internal structure to be used with adults with physical disabilities.
期刊介绍:
The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (BJPT) is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Physical Therapy Research and Graduate Studies (ABRAPG-Ft). It publishes original research articles on topics related to the areas of physical therapy and rehabilitation sciences, including clinical, basic or applied studies on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of movement disorders.