本科护理教育中的生物科学教与学:基于叙事综合的系统回顾。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226
Kieran R Manchester, Debbie Roberts
{"title":"本科护理教育中的生物科学教与学:基于叙事综合的系统回顾。","authors":"Kieran R Manchester, Debbie Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"82 ","pages":"104226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioscience teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran R Manchester, Debbie Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"104226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨护理本科生生物科学教育中使用的教学和学习方法,并评估其在知识获取和学生满意度方面的有效性:背景:了解生物科学对护士提供有效的病人护理至关重要。背景:了解生物科学对护士提供有效的病人护理至关重要,尽管其重要性不言而喻,但学生们往往在复杂的内容和有限的学习时间中挣扎:设计:根据 PRISMA 指南采用混合方法进行系统综述:方法:使用与护理教育和生物科学相关的关键词搜索了四个数据库(CINAHL、Medline、Web of Science 和 PubMed)。纳入标准主要针对 2003 年至 2023 年间发表的、评估本科护理学生生物科学教学或学习方法的同行评审研究。结果:本综述包括来自 28 个国家的 98 项研究。主动学习法普遍提高了学生的参与度、理解力和知识保留率。尽管在成本和可扩展性方面存在挑战,但技术强化学习提供了身临其境的互动体验。传统的教学方法因其对临床实践的见解和应用而受到学生的重视。混合式学习方法迎合了不同的学习偏好,提高了学习效果:结论:大多数教学和学习方法似乎都能改善护理本科生的生物科学教育,有助于短期内提高学生的知识水平和满意度。没有一种主动学习方法被认为是最有效的。课堂内外的有效支持和学习机会以及将理论应用于实践的策略都很重要。未来的研究应进一步评估不同的生物科学教学和学习方法对护理本科教育的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bioscience teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.

Aim: To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.

Background: Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.

Design: A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.

Methods: Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.

Conclusions: Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
The experience of transition from student nurse to registered nurse among newly graduated nurses in the paediatric setting: An integrative literature review. Sexual and reproductive health content in Australian pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs: A review of curricula. Effects of an ARCS-based interactive e-book featuring clinical scenarios on the learning motivation, self-efficacy and practical competence of nursing students in foetal heart rate interpretation. Corrigendum to "Unfinished nursing care occurrence, priority order and reasons as perceived by nursing students: An international study" [Nurse Educ. Pract. 79 (2024) 104100]. A cultural adaptation study of nursing informatics competency scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1