{"title":"本科护理教育中的生物科学教与学:基于叙事综合的系统回顾。","authors":"Kieran R Manchester, Debbie Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.</p>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"82 ","pages":"104226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioscience teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran R Manchester, Debbie Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"104226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bioscience teaching and learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Aim: To explore the teaching and learning methods used in bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students and evaluate their effectiveness for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction.
Background: Understanding bioscience is essential for nurses to provide effective patient care. Despite its importance, students often struggle with the complex content and limited learning time.
Design: A mixed-methods systematic review was employed following the PRISMA guidelines.
Methods: Four databases (CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using keywords related to nursing education and bioscience. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies published from 2003 to 2023 that evaluated teaching or learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing students. A narrative synthesis was conducted.
Results: This review includes 98 studies from 28 countries. Active learning methods generally improved student engagement, understanding, and retention of knowledge. Technology-enhanced learning provided immersive and interactive experiences, despite cost and scalability challenges. Traditional teaching methods were valued by students for their insights and application to clinical practice. Blended learning approaches catered to diverse learning preferences and improved learning.
Conclusions: Most teaching and learning approaches appear to improve bioscience education for undergraduate nursing students, supporting short-term improvements in knowledge and student satisfaction. No single active learning method was identified as the most effective. Effective support and learning opportunities both in and out of the classroom are important, as are strategies to allow application of theory to practice. Future research should further evaluate the long-term impact of different teaching and learning methods for bioscience in undergraduate nursing education.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.