[抗抑郁药物治疗中的安慰剂效应 :对抑郁症药物治疗的科学评估和临床应用的影响]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01784-5
Winfried Rief, Tobias Kube
{"title":"[抗抑郁药物治疗中的安慰剂效应 :对抑郁症药物治疗的科学评估和临床应用的影响]。","authors":"Winfried Rief, Tobias Kube","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01784-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinded placebo treatment arms in clinical trials often achieve up to 80% of the clinical improvements of the verum groups. Apparently, the majority of the effects found in the antidepressant groups in clinical trials are due to factors that are not specific to antidepressant treatment. This article reviews the factors that contribute to the high effectiveness of placebo interventions for antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative literature review is presented with particular emphasis on placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a particularly strong placebo effect in depression compared to other mental disorders. The magnitude of this effect can be modulated by helpful versus nonhelpful instructions, by patient participation in the decision-making process but also by personal attention, especially if the clinician is perceived as competent and warmhearted. The occurrence of subtle side effects can also reinforce placebo effects. Placebo effects are not only reflected in subjective patient-reported outcome variables but are also evident in neurochemical changes in the body.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians essentially contribute to the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment through their own behavior. At the same time, the relatively small overall difference between verum and placebo treatments for depression leads to the necessity of a critical evaluation of the cost-benefit ratio, adapted to the individual case. Study designs for the evaluation of antidepressants are required that better reflect the complex interactions between the genuine drug effects and placebo effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Placebo effect in the treatment with antidepressants : Implications for the scientific evaluation and clinical use of pharmaceutical treatments of depression].\",\"authors\":\"Winfried Rief, Tobias Kube\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00115-024-01784-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blinded placebo treatment arms in clinical trials often achieve up to 80% of the clinical improvements of the verum groups. Apparently, the majority of the effects found in the antidepressant groups in clinical trials are due to factors that are not specific to antidepressant treatment. This article reviews the factors that contribute to the high effectiveness of placebo interventions for antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative literature review is presented with particular emphasis on placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is a particularly strong placebo effect in depression compared to other mental disorders. The magnitude of this effect can be modulated by helpful versus nonhelpful instructions, by patient participation in the decision-making process but also by personal attention, especially if the clinician is perceived as competent and warmhearted. The occurrence of subtle side effects can also reinforce placebo effects. Placebo effects are not only reflected in subjective patient-reported outcome variables but are also evident in neurochemical changes in the body.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians essentially contribute to the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment through their own behavior. At the same time, the relatively small overall difference between verum and placebo treatments for depression leads to the necessity of a critical evaluation of the cost-benefit ratio, adapted to the individual case. Study designs for the evaluation of antidepressants are required that better reflect the complex interactions between the genuine drug effects and placebo effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01784-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01784-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在临床试验中,盲目的安慰剂治疗组的临床疗效往往只有安慰剂组的 80%。显然,临床试验中抗抑郁治疗组的大部分疗效是由非抗抑郁治疗特有的因素造成的。本文回顾了导致抗抑郁药物安慰剂干预高度有效的因素:方法:本文对文献进行了叙述性综述,特别强调了抗抑郁药物临床试验中的安慰剂效应:结果:与其他精神疾病相比,抑郁症的安慰剂效应尤为明显。这种效应的大小可以通过有帮助的指导与无帮助的指导、患者参与决策过程以及个人关注来调节,尤其是当临床医生被认为是有能力和热心肠的时候。微妙副作用的出现也会强化安慰剂效应。安慰剂效应不仅反映在患者主观报告的结果变量中,而且在体内神经化学变化中也很明显:结论:临床医生通过自己的行为从根本上促进了抗抑郁治疗的有效性。与此同时,由于抑郁症的维鲁姆治疗与安慰剂治疗之间的总体差异相对较小,因此有必要根据具体情况对成本效益比进行严格评估。评估抗抑郁药物的研究设计需要更好地反映真正的药物效应和安慰剂效应之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Placebo effect in the treatment with antidepressants : Implications for the scientific evaluation and clinical use of pharmaceutical treatments of depression].

Background: Blinded placebo treatment arms in clinical trials often achieve up to 80% of the clinical improvements of the verum groups. Apparently, the majority of the effects found in the antidepressant groups in clinical trials are due to factors that are not specific to antidepressant treatment. This article reviews the factors that contribute to the high effectiveness of placebo interventions for antidepressants.

Methods: A narrative literature review is presented with particular emphasis on placebo effects in antidepressant clinical trials.

Results: There is a particularly strong placebo effect in depression compared to other mental disorders. The magnitude of this effect can be modulated by helpful versus nonhelpful instructions, by patient participation in the decision-making process but also by personal attention, especially if the clinician is perceived as competent and warmhearted. The occurrence of subtle side effects can also reinforce placebo effects. Placebo effects are not only reflected in subjective patient-reported outcome variables but are also evident in neurochemical changes in the body.

Conclusion: Clinicians essentially contribute to the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment through their own behavior. At the same time, the relatively small overall difference between verum and placebo treatments for depression leads to the necessity of a critical evaluation of the cost-benefit ratio, adapted to the individual case. Study designs for the evaluation of antidepressants are required that better reflect the complex interactions between the genuine drug effects and placebo effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[Brain sagging dementia-A rare potentially reversible cause of dementia]. [Compatibility of care work and specialist training in psychiatry : Position paper of the generation PSY-Next generation initiative of the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy]. [Mechanisms of action of antidepressive pharmacotherapy: brain and mind-body and environment]. [Utilization of healthcare services by young adults with first psychotic episodes at the FRITZ am Urban in Berlin considering the migration background]. [Psychotropic drug-related weight gain-Are incretins/twincretins an option?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1