深度学习在内窥镜超声波上分割结直肠癌。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03056-5
F van den Noort, F Ter Borg, A Guitink, J Faber, J M Wolterink
{"title":"深度学习在内窥镜超声波上分割结直肠癌。","authors":"F van den Noort, F Ter Borg, A Guitink, J Faber, J M Wolterink","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03056-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bowel-preserving local resection of early rectal cancer is less successful if the tumor infiltrates the muscularis propria as opposed to submucosal infiltration only. Magnetic resonance imaging currently lacks the spatial resolution to provide a reliable estimation of the infiltration depth. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has better resolution, but its interpretation is investigator dependent. We hypothesize that automated image segmentation of EUS could be a way to standardize EUS interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EUS media and outcome data were collected prospectively. Based on 373 expert manual segmentations, a convolutional neural network was developed to perform segmentation of the submucosa, muscularis propria, and tumors. The mean surface distance (MSD), maximal distance between segmentations (Hausdorff distance; HDD), and overlap (Dice similarity index; DSI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median MSD and HDD values were 3.2 and 17.7 pixels for the tumor, 3.4 and 24.7 pixels for the submucosa, and 2.6 and 20.0 pixels for the muscularis propria, respectively. The median DSI values for the tumor, submucosa, and muscularis propria were 0.82, 0.57, and 0.59, respectively. These values reflect good agreement between manual and deep learning segmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found encouraging results of using automated analysis of EUS images of early rectal cancer, supporting further exploration in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for segmentation of colorectal carcinomas on endoscopic ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"F van den Noort, F Ter Borg, A Guitink, J Faber, J M Wolterink\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-024-03056-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bowel-preserving local resection of early rectal cancer is less successful if the tumor infiltrates the muscularis propria as opposed to submucosal infiltration only. Magnetic resonance imaging currently lacks the spatial resolution to provide a reliable estimation of the infiltration depth. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has better resolution, but its interpretation is investigator dependent. We hypothesize that automated image segmentation of EUS could be a way to standardize EUS interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EUS media and outcome data were collected prospectively. Based on 373 expert manual segmentations, a convolutional neural network was developed to perform segmentation of the submucosa, muscularis propria, and tumors. The mean surface distance (MSD), maximal distance between segmentations (Hausdorff distance; HDD), and overlap (Dice similarity index; DSI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median MSD and HDD values were 3.2 and 17.7 pixels for the tumor, 3.4 and 24.7 pixels for the submucosa, and 2.6 and 20.0 pixels for the muscularis propria, respectively. The median DSI values for the tumor, submucosa, and muscularis propria were 0.82, 0.57, and 0.59, respectively. These values reflect good agreement between manual and deep learning segmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found encouraging results of using automated analysis of EUS images of early rectal cancer, supporting further exploration in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03056-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03056-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如果肿瘤浸润固有肌,而非仅浸润粘膜下层,早期直肠癌保肠局部切除术的成功率较低。目前,磁共振成像缺乏空间分辨率,无法对浸润深度做出可靠的估计。内窥镜超声(EUS)具有更好的分辨率,但其解释取决于研究人员。我们假设,对 EUS 进行自动图像分割是实现 EUS 解释标准化的一种方法:方法:前瞻性地收集了 EUS 介质和结果数据。在 373 次专家手动分割的基础上,我们开发了一种卷积神经网络,用于对粘膜下层、固有肌和肿瘤进行分割。计算了平均表面距离(MSD)、分割间最大距离(Hausdorff距离;HDD)和重叠度(Dice相似性指数;DSI):肿瘤的 MSD 和 HDD 中值分别为 3.2 和 17.7 像素,粘膜下层分别为 3.4 和 24.7 像素,固有肌分别为 2.6 和 20.0 像素。肿瘤、黏膜下层和固有肌的 DSI 中值分别为 0.82、0.57 和 0.59。这些数值反映了人工分割与深度学习分割之间的良好一致性:本研究发现,对早期直肠癌的 EUS 图像进行自动分析取得了令人鼓舞的结果,支持在临床实践中进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning for segmentation of colorectal carcinomas on endoscopic ultrasound.

Background: Bowel-preserving local resection of early rectal cancer is less successful if the tumor infiltrates the muscularis propria as opposed to submucosal infiltration only. Magnetic resonance imaging currently lacks the spatial resolution to provide a reliable estimation of the infiltration depth. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has better resolution, but its interpretation is investigator dependent. We hypothesize that automated image segmentation of EUS could be a way to standardize EUS interpretation.

Methods: EUS media and outcome data were collected prospectively. Based on 373 expert manual segmentations, a convolutional neural network was developed to perform segmentation of the submucosa, muscularis propria, and tumors. The mean surface distance (MSD), maximal distance between segmentations (Hausdorff distance; HDD), and overlap (Dice similarity index; DSI) were calculated.

Results: The median MSD and HDD values were 3.2 and 17.7 pixels for the tumor, 3.4 and 24.7 pixels for the submucosa, and 2.6 and 20.0 pixels for the muscularis propria, respectively. The median DSI values for the tumor, submucosa, and muscularis propria were 0.82, 0.57, and 0.59, respectively. These values reflect good agreement between manual and deep learning segmentation.

Conclusions: This study found encouraging results of using automated analysis of EUS images of early rectal cancer, supporting further exploration in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Comparing answers of ChatGPT and Google Gemini to common questions on benign anal conditions. Robotic-assisted total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: a step-by-step approach for surgeons advancing to expertise. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in the treatment of rectal cancer: current practice and evolving approaches in India. Margin matters: analyzing the impact of circumferential margin involvement on survival and recurrence after incomplete total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Positive lateral lymph node turned negative after neoadjuvant therapy-surgery or observation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1