Gaofeng Fan , Xinyue Gao , Chang’an Wang , Yujie Hou , Jinming Zhang , Jie Xu , Defu Che
{"title":"WFGD后烟气及浆体余热、水资源季节性回收模拟研究","authors":"Gaofeng Fan , Xinyue Gao , Chang’an Wang , Yujie Hou , Jinming Zhang , Jie Xu , Defu Che","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efficient utilization of low-grade waste heat is pivotal for advancing energy savings and emissions reduction in power stations. However, the heat and water contained in flue gas and slurry post wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) have traditionally been underutilized. The flash-heat pump-heat exchanger (FHH) system and heat exchanger-heat pump (HH) system were proposed, employing heat exchangers (HE), flash column (FC), and absorption heat pumps (AHP) to utilize waste heat for seasonal heating and air heating purposes. A comprehensive evaluation of the systems was conducted, encompassing thermal performance, exergy analysis, economics, and environmental impact. The study revealed that the improved systems were more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly than before. The HH system recovered more low-temperature waste heat than the FHH system by 16.15–25.75 MW, and provided a shorter payback period of 2.37 years. The addition of FC and HE to WFGD improved exergy efficiency by 40 %. Both the FHH and HH systems achieved notable coal savings, with improvements ranging from 36 % to 37 % and 45–49 %, respectively, over the original system. Water of 14.18–38.9 t·h<sup>−1</sup> and 362 t·h<sup>−1</sup> were recovered through HE and FH, respectively. Overall, the improved systems provide guidance for the effective utilization of low temperature waste heat and in power plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 189-202"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation study on seasonal recovery of waste heat and water resources in flue gas and slurry after WFGD\",\"authors\":\"Gaofeng Fan , Xinyue Gao , Chang’an Wang , Yujie Hou , Jinming Zhang , Jie Xu , Defu Che\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2024.12.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Efficient utilization of low-grade waste heat is pivotal for advancing energy savings and emissions reduction in power stations. However, the heat and water contained in flue gas and slurry post wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) have traditionally been underutilized. The flash-heat pump-heat exchanger (FHH) system and heat exchanger-heat pump (HH) system were proposed, employing heat exchangers (HE), flash column (FC), and absorption heat pumps (AHP) to utilize waste heat for seasonal heating and air heating purposes. A comprehensive evaluation of the systems was conducted, encompassing thermal performance, exergy analysis, economics, and environmental impact. The study revealed that the improved systems were more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly than before. The HH system recovered more low-temperature waste heat than the FHH system by 16.15–25.75 MW, and provided a shorter payback period of 2.37 years. The addition of FC and HE to WFGD improved exergy efficiency by 40 %. Both the FHH and HH systems achieved notable coal savings, with improvements ranging from 36 % to 37 % and 45–49 %, respectively, over the original system. Water of 14.18–38.9 t·h<sup>−1</sup> and 362 t·h<sup>−1</sup> were recovered through HE and FH, respectively. Overall, the improved systems provide guidance for the effective utilization of low temperature waste heat and in power plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 189-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024015635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024015635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simulation study on seasonal recovery of waste heat and water resources in flue gas and slurry after WFGD
Efficient utilization of low-grade waste heat is pivotal for advancing energy savings and emissions reduction in power stations. However, the heat and water contained in flue gas and slurry post wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) have traditionally been underutilized. The flash-heat pump-heat exchanger (FHH) system and heat exchanger-heat pump (HH) system were proposed, employing heat exchangers (HE), flash column (FC), and absorption heat pumps (AHP) to utilize waste heat for seasonal heating and air heating purposes. A comprehensive evaluation of the systems was conducted, encompassing thermal performance, exergy analysis, economics, and environmental impact. The study revealed that the improved systems were more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly than before. The HH system recovered more low-temperature waste heat than the FHH system by 16.15–25.75 MW, and provided a shorter payback period of 2.37 years. The addition of FC and HE to WFGD improved exergy efficiency by 40 %. Both the FHH and HH systems achieved notable coal savings, with improvements ranging from 36 % to 37 % and 45–49 %, respectively, over the original system. Water of 14.18–38.9 t·h−1 and 362 t·h−1 were recovered through HE and FH, respectively. Overall, the improved systems provide guidance for the effective utilization of low temperature waste heat and in power plants.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.