cN3b 期乳腺癌患者腋窝管理的结果和趋势。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16630-w
Julia M Selfridge, Zachary Schrank, Chris B Agala, David W Ollila, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Dana L Casey, Philip M Spanheimer
{"title":"cN3b 期乳腺癌患者腋窝管理的结果和趋势。","authors":"Julia M Selfridge, Zachary Schrank, Chris B Agala, David W Ollila, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Dana L Casey, Philip M Spanheimer","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16630-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited data regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for cN3b patients, who present with both axillary and ipsilateral internal mammary node involvement. We examined trends in the use of SLNB in cN3b patients and survival by axillary procedure for those with nodal pathologic complete response (nPCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult women with nonmetastatic cN3b invasive breast carcinoma between 2012 and 2021 were selected from the National Cancer Database. These patients were compared based on type of axillary surgery, specifically SLNB, SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and ALND alone. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,236 patients were included. In 2012, 8.5% of these patients underwent SLNB alone and 18.3% underwent SLNB+ALND. In 2021, this increased to 35.1% for SLNB alone and 23.0% for SLNB with subsequent ALND (p < 0.0001). For patients who received NAC, the rate of nPCR was overall found to be 24.9%. Overall survival of patients receiving SLNB or SLNB+ALND with nPCR was not statistically significantly different from the ALND only group with nPCR (p = 0.22 and 0.57, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been increasing use of the SLNB procedure for patients with cN3b breast cancer over the past decade. In patients with nPCR, SLNB was not associated with reduced survival. For well-selected cN3b patients with an excellent clinical response to NAC, including nPCR, axillary de-escalation strategies, such as SLNB with omission of completion axillary dissection, may be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2070-2078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and Trends in Axillary Management of Stage cN3b Breast Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Julia M Selfridge, Zachary Schrank, Chris B Agala, David W Ollila, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Dana L Casey, Philip M Spanheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-024-16630-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited data regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for cN3b patients, who present with both axillary and ipsilateral internal mammary node involvement. We examined trends in the use of SLNB in cN3b patients and survival by axillary procedure for those with nodal pathologic complete response (nPCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult women with nonmetastatic cN3b invasive breast carcinoma between 2012 and 2021 were selected from the National Cancer Database. These patients were compared based on type of axillary surgery, specifically SLNB, SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and ALND alone. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,236 patients were included. In 2012, 8.5% of these patients underwent SLNB alone and 18.3% underwent SLNB+ALND. In 2021, this increased to 35.1% for SLNB alone and 23.0% for SLNB with subsequent ALND (p < 0.0001). For patients who received NAC, the rate of nPCR was overall found to be 24.9%. Overall survival of patients receiving SLNB or SLNB+ALND with nPCR was not statistically significantly different from the ALND only group with nPCR (p = 0.22 and 0.57, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There has been increasing use of the SLNB procedure for patients with cN3b breast cancer over the past decade. In patients with nPCR, SLNB was not associated with reduced survival. For well-selected cN3b patients with an excellent clinical response to NAC, including nPCR, axillary de-escalation strategies, such as SLNB with omission of completion axillary dissection, may be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2070-2078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16630-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16630-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于cN3b患者新辅助化疗(NAC)后前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的数据有限,这些患者同时伴有腋窝和同侧乳腺内结节受累。我们研究了 cN3b 患者使用 SLNB 的趋势,以及结节病理完全反应(nPCR)患者的腋窝手术存活率:从国家癌症数据库中选取了 2012 年至 2021 年间患有非转移性 cN3b 浸润性乳腺癌的成年女性患者。根据腋窝手术的类型,特别是SLNB、SLNB加腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)和单纯ALND,对这些患者进行比较。Kaplan-Meier分析用于比较总生存率:共纳入 4236 例患者。2012年,其中8.5%的患者仅接受了SLNB,18.3%的患者接受了SLNB+ALND。2021 年,仅接受 SLNB 的患者增至 35.1%,接受 SLNB 并随后接受 ALND 的患者增至 23.0%(p < 0.0001)。接受 NAC 治疗的患者的 nPCR 率总体为 24.9%。接受SLNB或SLNB+ALND并伴有nPCR的患者的总生存率与仅接受ALND并伴有nPCR的患者组相比没有显著的统计学差异(p=0.22和0.57):在过去十年中,越来越多的 cN3b 乳腺癌患者采用 SLNB 手术。在 nPCR 患者中,SLNB 与生存率降低无关。对于经过严格筛选、对 NAC(包括 nPCR)临床反应极佳的 cN3b 患者,可以考虑采用腋窝去势策略,如 SLNB,同时省略完整的腋窝解剖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes and Trends in Axillary Management of Stage cN3b Breast Cancer Patients.

Background: There is limited data regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for cN3b patients, who present with both axillary and ipsilateral internal mammary node involvement. We examined trends in the use of SLNB in cN3b patients and survival by axillary procedure for those with nodal pathologic complete response (nPCR).

Methods: Adult women with nonmetastatic cN3b invasive breast carcinoma between 2012 and 2021 were selected from the National Cancer Database. These patients were compared based on type of axillary surgery, specifically SLNB, SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and ALND alone. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival.

Results: A total of 4,236 patients were included. In 2012, 8.5% of these patients underwent SLNB alone and 18.3% underwent SLNB+ALND. In 2021, this increased to 35.1% for SLNB alone and 23.0% for SLNB with subsequent ALND (p < 0.0001). For patients who received NAC, the rate of nPCR was overall found to be 24.9%. Overall survival of patients receiving SLNB or SLNB+ALND with nPCR was not statistically significantly different from the ALND only group with nPCR (p = 0.22 and 0.57, respectively).

Conclusions: There has been increasing use of the SLNB procedure for patients with cN3b breast cancer over the past decade. In patients with nPCR, SLNB was not associated with reduced survival. For well-selected cN3b patients with an excellent clinical response to NAC, including nPCR, axillary de-escalation strategies, such as SLNB with omission of completion axillary dissection, may be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
期刊最新文献
ASO Visual Abstract: Are Positive Biopsy Margins in Melanoma Significant? A Cohort Study of Micro- Versus Macroscopic Margin Status and Their Impact on Residual Disease and Survival. ASO Visual Abstract: Negative Impact of Systemic Therapy on Survival in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Low-Grade Metastatic Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer. ASO Visual Abstract: Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces Predicts Survival in Resected Pulmonary Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma. ASO Visual Abstract: Impact of Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing with Expanded Eligibility for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients in a Large Integrated Health System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1