Colette Naude , David Skvarc , Yao Coitinho Biurra , Lily Blake , Subhadra Evans , Simon Knowles , O. Eric , Chatpakorn Prasertsung , Lahiru Russell , Anna Bassili , Antonina Mikocka-Walus
{"title":"针对成人炎症性肠病患者和心理困扰者的在线正念干预:Mind4IBD项目的可行性随机对照试验。","authors":"Colette Naude , David Skvarc , Yao Coitinho Biurra , Lily Blake , Subhadra Evans , Simon Knowles , O. Eric , Chatpakorn Prasertsung , Lahiru Russell , Anna Bassili , Antonina Mikocka-Walus","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapies, such as mindfulness-based interventions (MBI), for improving biopsychosocial outcomes. Therefore, the aim is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online-delivered, self-directed MBI, adapted to individuals with IBD and psychological distress, in comparison to wait-list control (WLC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>50 adults with IBD were randomized to WLC (<em>N</em> = 25) or intervention (N = 25) groups. The intervention (MIND4IBD program) consisted of six, weekly, 15-min videos (with guided meditations). Feasibility was examined through recruitment and retention rates, while acceptability was examined through intervention satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback. Preliminary efficacy was examined using linear mixed models for group differences in outcomes between baseline and post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary Outcomes. The retention rate for the WLC group was 92 %, while the retention rate for the intervention group was 48 %. However, 16 % of participants allocated to the intervention group never began the intervention, therefore this resulted in a retention rate of 71 % of participants who began the intervention. Acceptability was high with an average intervention satisfaction rating of 83/100. Secondary Outcomes. When compared with the WLC, the MIND4IBD program improved total mindfulness levels (b = 0.29, 95 %CI [0.11,0.47], <em>p</em> = 0.004) with a large effect size (β = 0.54, b = 0.19, 95 %CI [0.04,0.34], <em>p</em> = 0.014). Themes based on participants' intervention feedback included: 1) beginning of journey with mindfulness, 2) the beneficial impact of mindfulness, 3) why adapting the intervention to IBD is important, 4) views on program delivery, and 5) mixed reactions to AI generated presenters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MIND4IBD is feasible and acceptable for individuals with IBD and psychological distress. Participants' total mindfulness levels increased significantly in the intervention group compared to WLC. Most participants provided positive intervention feedback. These findings warrant a full-scale RCT to determine MIND4IBD's efficacy for IBD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 111984"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An online mindfulness-based intervention for adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease & psychological distress: A feasibility randomized controlled trial of the Mind4IBD program\",\"authors\":\"Colette Naude , David Skvarc , Yao Coitinho Biurra , Lily Blake , Subhadra Evans , Simon Knowles , O. Eric , Chatpakorn Prasertsung , Lahiru Russell , Anna Bassili , Antonina Mikocka-Walus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapies, such as mindfulness-based interventions (MBI), for improving biopsychosocial outcomes. Therefore, the aim is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online-delivered, self-directed MBI, adapted to individuals with IBD and psychological distress, in comparison to wait-list control (WLC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>50 adults with IBD were randomized to WLC (<em>N</em> = 25) or intervention (N = 25) groups. The intervention (MIND4IBD program) consisted of six, weekly, 15-min videos (with guided meditations). Feasibility was examined through recruitment and retention rates, while acceptability was examined through intervention satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback. Preliminary efficacy was examined using linear mixed models for group differences in outcomes between baseline and post-intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Primary Outcomes. The retention rate for the WLC group was 92 %, while the retention rate for the intervention group was 48 %. However, 16 % of participants allocated to the intervention group never began the intervention, therefore this resulted in a retention rate of 71 % of participants who began the intervention. Acceptability was high with an average intervention satisfaction rating of 83/100. Secondary Outcomes. When compared with the WLC, the MIND4IBD program improved total mindfulness levels (b = 0.29, 95 %CI [0.11,0.47], <em>p</em> = 0.004) with a large effect size (β = 0.54, b = 0.19, 95 %CI [0.04,0.34], <em>p</em> = 0.014). Themes based on participants' intervention feedback included: 1) beginning of journey with mindfulness, 2) the beneficial impact of mindfulness, 3) why adapting the intervention to IBD is important, 4) views on program delivery, and 5) mixed reactions to AI generated presenters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MIND4IBD is feasible and acceptable for individuals with IBD and psychological distress. Participants' total mindfulness levels increased significantly in the intervention group compared to WLC. Most participants provided positive intervention feedback. These findings warrant a full-scale RCT to determine MIND4IBD's efficacy for IBD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychosomatic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003969\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399924003969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的疾病活动与心理健康之间的双向关系促使人们研究心理治疗的疗效,如正念干预(MBI),以改善生物心理社会结果。因此,本研究的目的是检验在线交付的自我导向MBI的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效,该MBI适用于IBD和心理困扰患者,并与等候名单对照(WLC)进行比较。方法:50例成年IBD患者随机分为WLC组(N = 25)和干预组(N = 25)。干预(MIND4IBD计划)包括六个,每周,15分钟的视频(指导冥想)。可行性通过招募率和保留率来检验,可接受性通过干预满意度评分和定性反馈来检验。使用线性混合模型对基线和干预后结果的组间差异进行初步疗效检查。结果:主要结局。WLC组的保留率为92%,而干预组的保留率为48%。然而,被分配到干预组的参与者中有16%从未开始干预,因此这导致开始干预的参与者的保留率为71%。可接受性高,平均干预满意度为83/100。次要结局:与WLC相比,MIND4IBD方案提高了总正念水平(b = 0.29, 95% CI [0.11,0.47], p = 0.004),效应量大(β = 0.54, b = 0.19, 95% CI [0.04,0.34], p = 0.014)。基于参与者干预反馈的主题包括:1)正念之旅的开始,2)正念的有益影响,3)为什么使干预适应IBD很重要,4)对项目交付的看法,以及5)对人工智能生成的演示者的不同反应。结论:对于有IBD和心理困扰的个体,MIND4IBD是可行和可接受的。与WLC相比,干预组参与者的总正念水平显著提高。大多数参与者提供了积极的干预反馈。这些发现证明需要进行全面的随机对照试验来确定MIND4IBD对IBD的疗效。
An online mindfulness-based intervention for adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease & psychological distress: A feasibility randomized controlled trial of the Mind4IBD program
Objective
The bidirectional relationship between disease activity and mental health in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has prompted investigations into the efficacy of psychotherapies, such as mindfulness-based interventions (MBI), for improving biopsychosocial outcomes. Therefore, the aim is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online-delivered, self-directed MBI, adapted to individuals with IBD and psychological distress, in comparison to wait-list control (WLC).
Methods
50 adults with IBD were randomized to WLC (N = 25) or intervention (N = 25) groups. The intervention (MIND4IBD program) consisted of six, weekly, 15-min videos (with guided meditations). Feasibility was examined through recruitment and retention rates, while acceptability was examined through intervention satisfaction ratings and qualitative feedback. Preliminary efficacy was examined using linear mixed models for group differences in outcomes between baseline and post-intervention.
Results
Primary Outcomes. The retention rate for the WLC group was 92 %, while the retention rate for the intervention group was 48 %. However, 16 % of participants allocated to the intervention group never began the intervention, therefore this resulted in a retention rate of 71 % of participants who began the intervention. Acceptability was high with an average intervention satisfaction rating of 83/100. Secondary Outcomes. When compared with the WLC, the MIND4IBD program improved total mindfulness levels (b = 0.29, 95 %CI [0.11,0.47], p = 0.004) with a large effect size (β = 0.54, b = 0.19, 95 %CI [0.04,0.34], p = 0.014). Themes based on participants' intervention feedback included: 1) beginning of journey with mindfulness, 2) the beneficial impact of mindfulness, 3) why adapting the intervention to IBD is important, 4) views on program delivery, and 5) mixed reactions to AI generated presenters.
Conclusion
MIND4IBD is feasible and acceptable for individuals with IBD and psychological distress. Participants' total mindfulness levels increased significantly in the intervention group compared to WLC. Most participants provided positive intervention feedback. These findings warrant a full-scale RCT to determine MIND4IBD's efficacy for IBD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.