对历史上的邻里红线和当代健康结果进行系统回顾。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022
S J Bauer, B R Spoer, R Ehrman, I Nnodim Opara, H Wei, R S Ellendula, A H Haidar, M Hardeman, P D Levy, S J Korzeniewski
{"title":"对历史上的邻里红线和当代健康结果进行系统回顾。","authors":"S J Bauer, B R Spoer, R Ehrman, I Nnodim Opara, H Wei, R S Ellendula, A H Haidar, M Hardeman, P D Levy, S J Korzeniewski","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Historic redlining grades that were assigned to US neighborhoods based largely on minority race or ethnicity by the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) during the 1930s have been linked with adverse health outcomes among neighborhood residents. This review aimed to summarize the quantitative evidence, so we could determine if any findings are replicated and otherwise identify research gaps.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review by searching the PubMed® MEDLINE database for observational studies that reported on health outcomes among people who resided in neighborhoods that were assigned HOLC grades. We assessed quality by allocating points based on whether studies reported the sample size or count of people affected by outcomes (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points), and whether unadjusted magnitudes of association were reported alongside adjusted estimates (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points). The sum score was used to classify each study as high (2 points), average (3 points) or low quality (4 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 89 articles identified, 32 met inclusion criteria; 15 were deemed high-quality. The most frequently studied health conditions in order of descending frequency were: i) injury or violence (n = 8), ii) cancer (n = 7), iii) cardiometabolic (n = 6), iv) perinatal (n = 5), v) asthma (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People who lived in areas with less desirable HOLC grades tended to suffer higher than expected rates of injury or violence, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and some cardiometabolic disorders; associations with cancer were mostly null. Methodological differences limited opportunities for direct comparison across studies, and there was significant heterogeneity among the few estimates that were generally comparable. While robust data are lacking, the limited existing evidence supports a possible association between historically redlined areas and heightened risk of adverse health outcomes. Why this association may exist remains unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"181-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of historic neighborhood redlining and contemporary health outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"S J Bauer, B R Spoer, R Ehrman, I Nnodim Opara, H Wei, R S Ellendula, A H Haidar, M Hardeman, P D Levy, S J Korzeniewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Historic redlining grades that were assigned to US neighborhoods based largely on minority race or ethnicity by the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) during the 1930s have been linked with adverse health outcomes among neighborhood residents. This review aimed to summarize the quantitative evidence, so we could determine if any findings are replicated and otherwise identify research gaps.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review by searching the PubMed® MEDLINE database for observational studies that reported on health outcomes among people who resided in neighborhoods that were assigned HOLC grades. We assessed quality by allocating points based on whether studies reported the sample size or count of people affected by outcomes (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points), and whether unadjusted magnitudes of association were reported alongside adjusted estimates (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points). The sum score was used to classify each study as high (2 points), average (3 points) or low quality (4 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 89 articles identified, 32 met inclusion criteria; 15 were deemed high-quality. The most frequently studied health conditions in order of descending frequency were: i) injury or violence (n = 8), ii) cancer (n = 7), iii) cardiometabolic (n = 6), iv) perinatal (n = 5), v) asthma (n = 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People who lived in areas with less desirable HOLC grades tended to suffer higher than expected rates of injury or violence, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and some cardiometabolic disorders; associations with cancer were mostly null. Methodological differences limited opportunities for direct comparison across studies, and there was significant heterogeneity among the few estimates that were generally comparable. While robust data are lacking, the limited existing evidence supports a possible association between historically redlined areas and heightened risk of adverse health outcomes. Why this association may exist remains unknown.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"181-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在20世纪30年代,房屋所有者贷款公司(HOLC)根据少数民族或族裔划分的美国社区的历史红线等级与社区居民的不良健康结果有关。本综述旨在总结定量证据,以便我们可以确定是否有任何发现被复制,或者确定研究空白。研究设计:系统评价。方法:我们通过搜索PubMed®MEDLINE数据库,对居住在被分配为HOLC等级的社区的人们的健康结果进行了系统回顾。我们根据研究是否报告了样本量或受结果影响的人数(是= 1分,否= 2分)以及未调整的关联程度是否与调整后的估计值一起报告(是= 1分,否= 2分),通过分配分数来评估质量。总得分用于将每个研究分为高(2分),平均(3分)或低质量(4分)。结果:89篇文献中,32篇符合纳入标准;15个被认为是高质量的。最常被研究的健康状况(按频率降序排列)是:i)伤害或暴力(n = 8), ii)癌症(n = 7), iii)心脏代谢(n = 6), iv)围产期(n = 5), v)哮喘(n = 2)。结论:生活在HOLC等级较差地区的人往往遭受的伤害或暴力、哮喘、不良妊娠结局和一些心脏代谢疾病的发生率高于预期;与癌症的关联基本为零。方法上的差异限制了直接比较研究的机会,并且在少数具有一般可比性的估计中存在显著的异质性。虽然缺乏可靠的数据,但有限的现有证据支持历史上红线地区与不良健康结果风险增加之间可能存在关联。这种关联可能存在的原因尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of historic neighborhood redlining and contemporary health outcomes.

Objectives: Historic redlining grades that were assigned to US neighborhoods based largely on minority race or ethnicity by the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) during the 1930s have been linked with adverse health outcomes among neighborhood residents. This review aimed to summarize the quantitative evidence, so we could determine if any findings are replicated and otherwise identify research gaps.

Study design: Systematic review.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching the PubMed® MEDLINE database for observational studies that reported on health outcomes among people who resided in neighborhoods that were assigned HOLC grades. We assessed quality by allocating points based on whether studies reported the sample size or count of people affected by outcomes (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points), and whether unadjusted magnitudes of association were reported alongside adjusted estimates (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points). The sum score was used to classify each study as high (2 points), average (3 points) or low quality (4 points).

Results: Among the 89 articles identified, 32 met inclusion criteria; 15 were deemed high-quality. The most frequently studied health conditions in order of descending frequency were: i) injury or violence (n = 8), ii) cancer (n = 7), iii) cardiometabolic (n = 6), iv) perinatal (n = 5), v) asthma (n = 2).

Conclusion: People who lived in areas with less desirable HOLC grades tended to suffer higher than expected rates of injury or violence, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and some cardiometabolic disorders; associations with cancer were mostly null. Methodological differences limited opportunities for direct comparison across studies, and there was significant heterogeneity among the few estimates that were generally comparable. While robust data are lacking, the limited existing evidence supports a possible association between historically redlined areas and heightened risk of adverse health outcomes. Why this association may exist remains unknown.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Appraisal of World Health Organization guidelines for priority infectious diseases with potential to cause public health emergencies. Racial/ethnic inequities in potentially harmful supplement use: Results of a prospective US cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic. Association between diabetes prevalence and weekend warrior activity patterns. Prevalence and determinants of low birth weight in Ethiopia: A multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. Healthy ageing - Investing now for the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1