GRACE地下水模拟中土壤水分不确定性的揭示

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132489
Ikechukwu Kalu, Christopher E. Ndehedehe, Vagner G. Ferreira, Sreekanth Janardhanan, Mark J. Kennard
{"title":"GRACE地下水模拟中土壤水分不确定性的揭示","authors":"Ikechukwu Kalu, Christopher E. Ndehedehe, Vagner G. Ferreira, Sreekanth Janardhanan, Mark J. Kennard","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil moisture data is essential for estimating groundwater storage anomalies (GWSA) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data, but the general lack of direct in-situ root-zone soil moisture observations has typically resulted in a reliance on modelled soil moisture estimates instead. These model-simulated soil moisture profiles – upper (0 to 10 cm), lower (10 to 100 cm), and deep layers (100 to 200 cm), are characterized by large uncertainties due to the simplification and parameterization of soil moisture processes in hydrological models. It is thus crucial to account for these uncertainties and understand how they affect the estimation of groundwater storage changes based on GRACE data. In this study, we evaluated the contributions and impacts of different soil moisture profiles on GRACE-derived groundwater storage (between 2002 and 2016) modelling uncertainties over the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) using statistical and machine learning regression. We observed that the lower layer exhibited the strongest correlation with base GWSA, particularly during 2006 to 2009 (r = 0.99, RMSE = 7.50 mm). Bootstrap analysis indicated that the lower layer consistently had the largest absolute coefficient weights, signifying its predominant influence on GWSA predictions. The deep layer contributed the least during 2010 to 2013, while the upper layer was highly dynamic and introduced a 26.8 % more uncertainty rating when compared to the lower layer. Regression analysis showed the lower layer maintained the smallest confidence interval widths, confirming its reliability. The Monte Carlo resampling corroborated these findings, with the lower layer maintaining the most consistent relationship with base GWSA across all periods. The lower layer’s steadier state and lower susceptibility to surface disturbances provided more accurate predictions than other layers. This study advances the modelling of groundwater storage from space by improving our understanding of the uncertainties introduced by the different soil moisture layers. It will be helpful for better and accurate freshwater reporting and management.","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling soil moisture uncertainties in GRACE groundwater modelling\",\"authors\":\"Ikechukwu Kalu, Christopher E. Ndehedehe, Vagner G. Ferreira, Sreekanth Janardhanan, Mark J. Kennard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil moisture data is essential for estimating groundwater storage anomalies (GWSA) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data, but the general lack of direct in-situ root-zone soil moisture observations has typically resulted in a reliance on modelled soil moisture estimates instead. These model-simulated soil moisture profiles – upper (0 to 10 cm), lower (10 to 100 cm), and deep layers (100 to 200 cm), are characterized by large uncertainties due to the simplification and parameterization of soil moisture processes in hydrological models. It is thus crucial to account for these uncertainties and understand how they affect the estimation of groundwater storage changes based on GRACE data. In this study, we evaluated the contributions and impacts of different soil moisture profiles on GRACE-derived groundwater storage (between 2002 and 2016) modelling uncertainties over the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) using statistical and machine learning regression. We observed that the lower layer exhibited the strongest correlation with base GWSA, particularly during 2006 to 2009 (r = 0.99, RMSE = 7.50 mm). Bootstrap analysis indicated that the lower layer consistently had the largest absolute coefficient weights, signifying its predominant influence on GWSA predictions. The deep layer contributed the least during 2010 to 2013, while the upper layer was highly dynamic and introduced a 26.8 % more uncertainty rating when compared to the lower layer. Regression analysis showed the lower layer maintained the smallest confidence interval widths, confirming its reliability. The Monte Carlo resampling corroborated these findings, with the lower layer maintaining the most consistent relationship with base GWSA across all periods. The lower layer’s steadier state and lower susceptibility to surface disturbances provided more accurate predictions than other layers. This study advances the modelling of groundwater storage from space by improving our understanding of the uncertainties introduced by the different soil moisture layers. It will be helpful for better and accurate freshwater reporting and management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132489\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤湿度数据对于从重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)数据中估计地下水储存异常(GWSA)至关重要,但普遍缺乏直接的原位根区土壤湿度观测,通常导致依赖模拟土壤湿度估算。这些模式模拟的土壤水分剖面——上层(0 ~ 10 cm)、下层(10 ~ 100 cm)和深层(100 ~ 200 cm),由于水文模型中土壤水分过程的简化和参数化,具有很大的不确定性。因此,考虑这些不确定性并了解它们如何影响基于GRACE数据的地下水储量变化估计是至关重要的。在这项研究中,我们利用统计和机器学习回归评估了不同土壤湿度剖面对grace导出的地下水储量(2002年至2016年)在默里达令盆地(MDB)建模不确定性的贡献和影响。我们观察到低层与基础GWSA的相关性最强,特别是在2006年至2009年(r = 0.99, RMSE = 7.50 mm)。Bootstrap分析表明,低层始终具有最大的绝对系数权重,表明其对GWSA预测的主要影响。2010 - 2013年,深层的不确定性贡献最小,而上层的不确定性是高度动态的,与下层相比,引入了26.8%的不确定性评级。回归分析显示,下层保持最小的置信区间宽度,证实了其可靠性。蒙特卡洛重新采样证实了这些发现,低层在所有时期与基本GWSA保持最一致的关系。低层较稳定的状态和较低的对地表扰动的敏感性提供了比其他层更准确的预测。这项研究通过提高我们对不同土壤湿度层引入的不确定性的理解,推进了空间地下水储存的建模。这将有助于更好、准确地报告和管理淡水资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unravelling soil moisture uncertainties in GRACE groundwater modelling
Soil moisture data is essential for estimating groundwater storage anomalies (GWSA) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data, but the general lack of direct in-situ root-zone soil moisture observations has typically resulted in a reliance on modelled soil moisture estimates instead. These model-simulated soil moisture profiles – upper (0 to 10 cm), lower (10 to 100 cm), and deep layers (100 to 200 cm), are characterized by large uncertainties due to the simplification and parameterization of soil moisture processes in hydrological models. It is thus crucial to account for these uncertainties and understand how they affect the estimation of groundwater storage changes based on GRACE data. In this study, we evaluated the contributions and impacts of different soil moisture profiles on GRACE-derived groundwater storage (between 2002 and 2016) modelling uncertainties over the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) using statistical and machine learning regression. We observed that the lower layer exhibited the strongest correlation with base GWSA, particularly during 2006 to 2009 (r = 0.99, RMSE = 7.50 mm). Bootstrap analysis indicated that the lower layer consistently had the largest absolute coefficient weights, signifying its predominant influence on GWSA predictions. The deep layer contributed the least during 2010 to 2013, while the upper layer was highly dynamic and introduced a 26.8 % more uncertainty rating when compared to the lower layer. Regression analysis showed the lower layer maintained the smallest confidence interval widths, confirming its reliability. The Monte Carlo resampling corroborated these findings, with the lower layer maintaining the most consistent relationship with base GWSA across all periods. The lower layer’s steadier state and lower susceptibility to surface disturbances provided more accurate predictions than other layers. This study advances the modelling of groundwater storage from space by improving our understanding of the uncertainties introduced by the different soil moisture layers. It will be helpful for better and accurate freshwater reporting and management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Evolution patterns, driving mechanisms, and ecological indicative effects of 730 lakes water color in the Yangtze River Basin (1984–2023) Hydrological connectivity and biogeochemical dynamics in the function and management of the lower Oder floodplain Urban real-time rainfall-runoff prediction using adaptive SSA-decomposition with dual attention Geochemical behavior of high-level radium contamination in representative coastal saltworks LSTM-FKAN coupled with feature extraction technique for Precipitation–Runoff modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1