统计形状模型量化髋关节翻修手术中的髋臼缺陷:对分类和手术规划的影响

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5
Jiang Wang, Fengjin Guo, Qing Yang, Kai Sun, Ke Yuan, Xu Zhang, Liang Qin
{"title":"统计形状模型量化髋关节翻修手术中的髋臼缺陷:对分类和手术规划的影响","authors":"Jiang Wang,&nbsp;Fengjin Guo,&nbsp;Qing Yang,&nbsp;Kai Sun,&nbsp;Ke Yuan,&nbsp;Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Qin","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purposes of this study was to develop a novel therapy-oriented acetabular bone defects classification system based on Statistical shape models (SSMs) and evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of its application.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed and annotated pelvic Computed tomography (CT) of patients who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty at our institution and constructed a dataset to develop the novel method for quantitatively describing acetabular bone defects that is based on SSMs. Then, using this method, classification systems are suggestive for diagnosis and corresponding treatment suggestion. In addition, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this classification system was calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The novel classification based on SSMs was successfully applied to 106 hips, Incidences of type A, B, C, D and E were 16.04%, 27.36%, 34.91%, 14.15% and 7.55%, respectively. The novel classification system demonstrated a higher level of interobserver and intraobserver reliability (0.828 and 0.844).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This classification system, which has demonstrated moderate to strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, may be particularly useful to accurately evaluate acetabular defects and suggest surgical strategies, as a complement to the traditional Paprosky classification system in revision THA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical shape models quantify acetabular defects in hip revision surgery: implications for classification and surgical planning\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Wang,&nbsp;Fengjin Guo,&nbsp;Qing Yang,&nbsp;Kai Sun,&nbsp;Ke Yuan,&nbsp;Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Liang Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purposes of this study was to develop a novel therapy-oriented acetabular bone defects classification system based on Statistical shape models (SSMs) and evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of its application.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed and annotated pelvic Computed tomography (CT) of patients who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty at our institution and constructed a dataset to develop the novel method for quantitatively describing acetabular bone defects that is based on SSMs. Then, using this method, classification systems are suggestive for diagnosis and corresponding treatment suggestion. In addition, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this classification system was calculated.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The novel classification based on SSMs was successfully applied to 106 hips, Incidences of type A, B, C, D and E were 16.04%, 27.36%, 34.91%, 14.15% and 7.55%, respectively. The novel classification system demonstrated a higher level of interobserver and intraobserver reliability (0.828 and 0.844).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This classification system, which has demonstrated moderate to strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, may be particularly useful to accurately evaluate acetabular defects and suggest surgical strategies, as a complement to the traditional Paprosky classification system in revision THA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05651-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical shape models quantify acetabular defects in hip revision surgery: implications for classification and surgical planning

Purpose

The purposes of this study was to develop a novel therapy-oriented acetabular bone defects classification system based on Statistical shape models (SSMs) and evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of its application.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed and annotated pelvic Computed tomography (CT) of patients who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty at our institution and constructed a dataset to develop the novel method for quantitatively describing acetabular bone defects that is based on SSMs. Then, using this method, classification systems are suggestive for diagnosis and corresponding treatment suggestion. In addition, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this classification system was calculated.

Results

The novel classification based on SSMs was successfully applied to 106 hips, Incidences of type A, B, C, D and E were 16.04%, 27.36%, 34.91%, 14.15% and 7.55%, respectively. The novel classification system demonstrated a higher level of interobserver and intraobserver reliability (0.828 and 0.844).

Conclusion

This classification system, which has demonstrated moderate to strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, may be particularly useful to accurately evaluate acetabular defects and suggest surgical strategies, as a complement to the traditional Paprosky classification system in revision THA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up. Scapho-metacarpal dual mobility prosthesis for TMC-1 joint salvage: technical insights. The single antegrade sling graft: a novel hamstring autograft technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1