治疗距骨深层骨软骨损伤的两种不同手术技术的前瞻性比较:镶嵌成形术与使用支架和胫骨骺板自体骨移植的全关节镜技术

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z
Mustafa Özyıldıran, Mehmet Armangil, Emre Anıl Özbek, Ramazan Akmeşe
{"title":"治疗距骨深层骨软骨损伤的两种不同手术技术的前瞻性比较:镶嵌成形术与使用支架和胫骨骺板自体骨移植的全关节镜技术","authors":"Mustafa Özyıldıran,&nbsp;Mehmet Armangil,&nbsp;Emre Anıl Özbek,&nbsp;Ramazan Akmeşe","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are various surgical techniques applied for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The mosaicplasty technique is one of the most commonly used methods for deep lesions. The all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond is a novel method as an alternative to the mosaicplasty. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two different surgical techniques in the treatment of deep OLT.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>From September 2019 to July 2021, 30 patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomly divided into two groups for either mosaicplasty or the all-arthroscopic technique, and they were evaluated prospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments were performed at 6th and 12th month postoperatively according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mosaicplasty was applied to 15 patients, and all-arthroscopic technique was applied to 15 patients. 14 of the patients were female and 16 were male; the mean age was 38.1. Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 6th and 12th months (p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in comparison of clinical scores at any time period. There was no significant difference between the two methods according to the total MOCART scores (p &gt; 0.05). However, the all-arthroscopic technique was more successful in terms of “border integration” and “repair tissue structure” (p &lt; 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI) and lesion surface area were not correlated with clinical scores.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In terms of clinical and radiological scores, similar results were obtained in the treatment groups. Both surgical techniques were found to be effective in the treatment of deep OLT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Özyıldıran,&nbsp;Mehmet Armangil,&nbsp;Emre Anıl Özbek,&nbsp;Ramazan Akmeşe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are various surgical techniques applied for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The mosaicplasty technique is one of the most commonly used methods for deep lesions. The all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond is a novel method as an alternative to the mosaicplasty. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two different surgical techniques in the treatment of deep OLT.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>From September 2019 to July 2021, 30 patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomly divided into two groups for either mosaicplasty or the all-arthroscopic technique, and they were evaluated prospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments were performed at 6th and 12th month postoperatively according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Mosaicplasty was applied to 15 patients, and all-arthroscopic technique was applied to 15 patients. 14 of the patients were female and 16 were male; the mean age was 38.1. Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 6th and 12th months (p &lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in comparison of clinical scores at any time period. There was no significant difference between the two methods according to the total MOCART scores (p &gt; 0.05). However, the all-arthroscopic technique was more successful in terms of “border integration” and “repair tissue structure” (p &lt; 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI) and lesion surface area were not correlated with clinical scores.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In terms of clinical and radiological scores, similar results were obtained in the treatment groups. Both surgical techniques were found to be effective in the treatment of deep OLT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05673-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗距骨软骨病变(OLT)的手术技术多种多样。镶嵌成形术是治疗深部病变最常用的方法之一。全关节镜下从胫骨平台取出支架和自体骨移植技术是一种替代镶嵌成形术的新方法。本研究的目的是比较这两种不同的手术技术治疗深度原位移植术的临床和影像学结果。材料与方法选择2019年9月至2021年7月30例距骨深部骨软骨病变患者,随机分为两组,分别采用镶嵌成形术和全关节镜技术,进行前瞻性评价。采用美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行术前、术后组内及组间评分。术后第6、12个月根据软骨修复组织(MOCART)量表磁共振观察进行影像学评估。结果15例患者行滑膜成形术,15例患者行全关节镜技术。其中女性14例,男性16例;平均年龄为38.1岁。组内评估显示术后第6个月和第12个月的AOFAS和VAS评分有显著改善(p < 0.05)。两组间各时间段的临床评分比较均无显著差异。两种方法的MOCART总分比较,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。然而,全关节镜技术在“边界整合”和“修复组织结构”方面更为成功(p < 0.05)。年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)和病变表面积与临床评分无相关性。结论两组患者的临床和影像学评分基本一致。这两种手术技术都被认为是治疗深度OLT的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective comparison of two different surgical technique in the treatment of deep osteochondral lesions of the talus: mosaicplasty versus all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond

Introduction

There are various surgical techniques applied for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The mosaicplasty technique is one of the most commonly used methods for deep lesions. The all-arthroscopic technique with scaffold and autograft bone taken from the tibial plafond is a novel method as an alternative to the mosaicplasty. This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological results of these two different surgical techniques in the treatment of deep OLT.

Materials and methods

From September 2019 to July 2021, 30 patients with deep osteochondral lesions of the talus were randomly divided into two groups for either mosaicplasty or the all-arthroscopic technique, and they were evaluated prospectively. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were evaluated within and between groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Radiological assessments were performed at 6th and 12th month postoperatively according to the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scale.

Results

Mosaicplasty was applied to 15 patients, and all-arthroscopic technique was applied to 15 patients. 14 of the patients were female and 16 were male; the mean age was 38.1. Within-group evaluations revealed significant improvements in AOFAS and VAS scores at postoperative 6th and 12th months (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in comparison of clinical scores at any time period. There was no significant difference between the two methods according to the total MOCART scores (p > 0.05). However, the all-arthroscopic technique was more successful in terms of “border integration” and “repair tissue structure” (p < 0.05). Age, body mass index (BMI) and lesion surface area were not correlated with clinical scores.

Conclusions

In terms of clinical and radiological scores, similar results were obtained in the treatment groups. Both surgical techniques were found to be effective in the treatment of deep OLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for implant-associated infection after bone allograft reconstruction: a 20-year retrospective cohort study. Using an App based algorithm to determine axial rotation and pelvic tilt at the time of an AP radiograph: a sawbone study. Why it's better to believe in a larger definition of the diametaphyseal junction zone in pediatric distal radius fractures. Optimizing initial biomechanical strength ("Time Zero") of posterior repair in total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison of suture materials and knot configurations. Intravenous versus oral tranexamic acid in shoulder arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1