Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka
{"title":"胆囊支原体疫苗在鸡中的效力比较。","authors":"Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>The efficacy of two <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated <i>M. gallisepticum</i> bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent <i>M. gallisepticum</i> R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Efficacy of <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> Vaccine Programs in Chickens.\",\"authors\":\"Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>The efficacy of two <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated <i>M. gallisepticum</i> bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent <i>M. gallisepticum</i> R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the Efficacy of Mycoplasma gallisepticum Vaccine Programs in Chickens.
ABSTRACTThe efficacy of two Mycoplasma gallisepticum commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated M. gallisepticum bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (P ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent M. gallisepticum R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (P ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (P ≤ 0.05).
期刊介绍:
Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.