胆囊支原体疫苗在鸡中的效力比较。

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Avian Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508
Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka
{"title":"胆囊支原体疫苗在鸡中的效力比较。","authors":"Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>The efficacy of two <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated <i>M. gallisepticum</i> bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent <i>M. gallisepticum</i> R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Efficacy of <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> Vaccine Programs in Chickens.\",\"authors\":\"Naola Ferguson-Noel, Marianne Dos Santos, Mohammadreza Ehsan, Eniope B Oluwayinka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>The efficacy of two <i>Mycoplasma gallisepticum</i> commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated <i>M. gallisepticum</i> bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent <i>M. gallisepticum</i> R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avian Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2024.2443508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在两项试验中评估了两种市售五倍子支原体疫苗单独接种或联合接种的效果;在这两项试验中,无特异性病原体(SPF)鸡分别在 5 周龄(WOA)接种 F 株减毒活疫苗,在 9 周龄和 13 周龄(WOA)接种灭活的五倍子支原体细菌素,或同时接种两种疫苗。在第一项试验中,接种疫苗的禽类组和对照组分别在 22 周龄和 41 周龄时通过气溶胶接种 R 型毒株疫苗。所有接受评估的疫苗方案都显示,在任何一个时间点接受挑战后,挑战菌株的定植率都有显著的统计学下降。然而,只有包含活疫苗的方案才对呼吸道病变和卵巢退化有显著保护作用;虽然数值差异表明联合方案(活疫苗+细菌素)有益处,但细菌素的添加并没有以统计学上显著的方式提高(或降低)F株疫苗的效力(P ≤ 0.05)。在第二项试验中,接种过疫苗的禽类与对照组一起,在17周龄时通过气溶胶接种不同剂量的致病性五联球菌R株。该试验中的两种疫苗接种方案(纯活疫苗和活疫苗+细菌素)都能显著防止挑战株定植和气囊病变(P ≤ 0.05);此外,与纯活疫苗相比,活疫苗+细菌素方案在挑战株定植和气囊病变保护方面的效果显著提高(P ≤ 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Efficacy of Mycoplasma gallisepticum Vaccine Programs in Chickens.

ABSTRACTThe efficacy of two Mycoplasma gallisepticum commercially available vaccines administered singly or in combination was evaluated in two trials; in both trials, specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens were vaccinated with the live attenuated F-strain vaccine at 5 weeks of age (WOA), an inactivated M. gallisepticum bacterin at 9 and 13 WOA, or both vaccines. In the first trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with virulent R-strain at 22 and 41 weeks of age. All of the vaccine programs evaluated showed a statistically significant reduction in colonization with the challenge strain following challenge at either timepoint. However, only the programs including the live vaccine also showed significant protection from respiratory lesions and ovarian regression; and although there were numerical differences indicating benefits of a combined (live + bacterin) program, the addition of bacterins did not enhance (or reduce) the efficacy of the F-strain vaccine in a statistically significant manner (P ≤ 0.05). In the second trial, groups of vaccinated birds, along with controls, were challenged via aerosol with different doses of virulent M. gallisepticum R-strain at 17 weeks of age. Both vaccination programs in this trial (live only and live + bacterin) resulted in significant protection against challenge strain colonization and air sac lesions (P ≤ 0.05); In addition, the live + bacterin program showed significantly improved results with respect to colonization with the challenge strain as well as protection from air sac lesions compared to the live vaccine alone (P ≤ 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Pathology
Avian Pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.
期刊最新文献
Copper nanoparticles effectively reduce Salmonella Enteritidis in broiler chicken diet and water. Isolation and pathogenicity of a fowl adenovirus 8b (FAdV-8b) strain in Cherry Valley ducks. Continuing evolution of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3.2.1a G2 genotype in domestic poultry of Bangladesh during 2018-2021. Age of challenge is important in Salmonella Enteritidis studies in pullets and hens: a systematic review. Identification and characterization of chicken TRIM45 and its role as a negative regulator of ALV-J replication in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1