水肺潜水及高压氧治疗近视的发展:1例报告及系统回顾。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.28920/dhm54.4.328-337
Sofia A Sokolowski, Anne K Räisänen-Sokolowski, Richard V Lundell
{"title":"水肺潜水及高压氧治疗近视的发展:1例报告及系统回顾。","authors":"Sofia A Sokolowski, Anne K Räisänen-Sokolowski, Richard V Lundell","doi":"10.28920/dhm54.4.328-337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A 54-year-old, previously healthy Caucasian male diver was on a 22-day liveaboard diving holiday. During this time, he performed 75 open-circuit dives, of which 72 were with enriched air nitrox. All dives were within recreational length and depth. After the trip he noticed a worsening of vision and his refraction had changed from the previous -3.75/-5.75 to -5.5/-7.75 dioptres. Hyperoxic myopia is a well-known phenomenon after hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), but related literature in recreational divers is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review on the effect of a hyperoxic environment on the development of myopia was done according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A risk of bias analysis was done on all articles, and the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Articles that had sufficient data were used to synthesise a visualisation of oxygen exposure and changes in refraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two articles were included in this review. These included five case reports, two case series, nine cohort studies, one randomised controlled trial and five reviews, of which one was systematic. Most articles described HBOT patients' ocular complications, although four articles were diver centric. The synthesis of results suggests that divers tend to get a greater myopic shift with a smaller exposure. However, the data were too heterogeneous to perform meaningful statistical analyses. This review is the first to focus on divers instead of HBOT patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The case presented led to a systematic literature review on the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on refractive changes in both HBOT patients and divers. The data were too heterogeneous to make meaningful suggestions on a safety limit to prevent myopisation in diving.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"54 4","pages":"328-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of myopia in scuba diving and hyperbaric oxygen treatment: a case report and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia A Sokolowski, Anne K Räisänen-Sokolowski, Richard V Lundell\",\"doi\":\"10.28920/dhm54.4.328-337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A 54-year-old, previously healthy Caucasian male diver was on a 22-day liveaboard diving holiday. During this time, he performed 75 open-circuit dives, of which 72 were with enriched air nitrox. All dives were within recreational length and depth. After the trip he noticed a worsening of vision and his refraction had changed from the previous -3.75/-5.75 to -5.5/-7.75 dioptres. Hyperoxic myopia is a well-known phenomenon after hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), but related literature in recreational divers is scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review on the effect of a hyperoxic environment on the development of myopia was done according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A risk of bias analysis was done on all articles, and the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Articles that had sufficient data were used to synthesise a visualisation of oxygen exposure and changes in refraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two articles were included in this review. These included five case reports, two case series, nine cohort studies, one randomised controlled trial and five reviews, of which one was systematic. Most articles described HBOT patients' ocular complications, although four articles were diver centric. The synthesis of results suggests that divers tend to get a greater myopic shift with a smaller exposure. However, the data were too heterogeneous to perform meaningful statistical analyses. This review is the first to focus on divers instead of HBOT patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The case presented led to a systematic literature review on the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on refractive changes in both HBOT patients and divers. The data were too heterogeneous to make meaningful suggestions on a safety limit to prevent myopisation in diving.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"328-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm54.4.328-337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm54.4.328-337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:一名54岁,以前健康的白人男性潜水员正在进行为期22天的船宿潜水假期。在此期间,他进行了75次开路潜水,其中72次是在富氧空气中进行的。所有的潜水都在休闲长度和深度范围内。旅行结束后,他发现视力越来越差,他的屈光度从之前的-3.75/-5.75变为-5.5/-7.75。高氧性近视是高压氧治疗后常见的现象,但有关休闲潜水员的相关文献很少。方法:根据PRISMA指南对高氧环境对近视发展的影响进行系统的文献综述。检索了三个数据库:Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus和Cochrane Library。对所有文章进行偏倚风险分析,并采用GRADE方法评价证据质量。有足够数据的文章被用来合成氧气暴露和折射变化的可视化。结果:22篇文章被纳入本综述。其中包括5个病例报告、2个病例系列、9个队列研究、1个随机对照试验和5个综述,其中1个是系统综述。大多数文章描述了HBOT患者的眼部并发症,尽管有四篇文章以潜水员为中心。综合结果表明,潜水员往往会在更小的曝光下获得更大的近视偏移。然而,数据太过异质,无法进行有意义的统计分析。这篇综述是第一次关注潜水员而不是HBOT患者。结论:我们对高压氧对HBOT患者和潜水员屈光变化的影响进行了系统的文献综述。这些数据差异太大,无法就防止跳水近视的安全限制提出有意义的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of myopia in scuba diving and hyperbaric oxygen treatment: a case report and systematic review.

Introduction: A 54-year-old, previously healthy Caucasian male diver was on a 22-day liveaboard diving holiday. During this time, he performed 75 open-circuit dives, of which 72 were with enriched air nitrox. All dives were within recreational length and depth. After the trip he noticed a worsening of vision and his refraction had changed from the previous -3.75/-5.75 to -5.5/-7.75 dioptres. Hyperoxic myopia is a well-known phenomenon after hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), but related literature in recreational divers is scarce.

Methods: A systematic literature review on the effect of a hyperoxic environment on the development of myopia was done according to the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. A risk of bias analysis was done on all articles, and the GRADE approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Articles that had sufficient data were used to synthesise a visualisation of oxygen exposure and changes in refraction.

Results: Twenty-two articles were included in this review. These included five case reports, two case series, nine cohort studies, one randomised controlled trial and five reviews, of which one was systematic. Most articles described HBOT patients' ocular complications, although four articles were diver centric. The synthesis of results suggests that divers tend to get a greater myopic shift with a smaller exposure. However, the data were too heterogeneous to perform meaningful statistical analyses. This review is the first to focus on divers instead of HBOT patients.

Conclusions: The case presented led to a systematic literature review on the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on refractive changes in both HBOT patients and divers. The data were too heterogeneous to make meaningful suggestions on a safety limit to prevent myopisation in diving.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Anaesthetic and surgical management of gastric perforation secondary to a diving incident: a case report. Divers treated in Townsville, Australia: worse symptoms lead to poorer outcomes. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a cohort study of 10 versus more than 10 treatments. Meclizine seasickness medication and its effect on central nervous system oxygen toxicity in a murine model. Modelling the risk factors for accidents in recreational divers: results from a cross-sectional evaluation in Belgium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1