Davide Salera, Antonio Bellasi, Lucia Del Vecchio, Francesco Locatelli
{"title":"慢性肾脏疾病高磷血症当前和新兴治疗模式的最新进展。","authors":"Davide Salera, Antonio Bellasi, Lucia Del Vecchio, Francesco Locatelli","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2441328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperphosphatemia in advanced CKD often accompanies high PTH and FGF23 levels, impaired bone mineralization, ectopic calcifications, and increased cardiovascular risks. Novel treatments are now available to lower serum phosphorus effectively. However, safety, tolerability, and patient adherence must be evaluated to determine the best therapeutic option for hyperphosphatemia.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines available treatment strategies for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients and new emerging treatments, emphasizing the latest inhibitors of active phosphate absorption.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite the numerous compounds available, managing hyperphosphatemia in CKD remains challenging. While many phosphate binders exist, they often have limitations and side effects. Aluminum carries significant toxicity risks. Calcium-based binders are effective but can cause hypercalcemia and vascular calcification. Lanthanum is absorbed in the gut, but its long-term tissue deposition appears clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer reduces vascular calcification but has inconclusive data and gastrointestinal side effects. Iron-based binders are effective but may cause gastrointestinal discomfort and lack long-term outcome data. New inhibitors of intestinal phosphate absorption show promise with low pill burden but need more clinical validation. Although these newer compounds might eventually improve phosphate management in CKD patients, enhancing adherence and reducing pill burden, future studies are required to elucidate the best treatment for hyperphosphatemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"85-100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update on current and emerging treatment paradigms for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Salera, Antonio Bellasi, Lucia Del Vecchio, Francesco Locatelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14656566.2024.2441328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperphosphatemia in advanced CKD often accompanies high PTH and FGF23 levels, impaired bone mineralization, ectopic calcifications, and increased cardiovascular risks. Novel treatments are now available to lower serum phosphorus effectively. However, safety, tolerability, and patient adherence must be evaluated to determine the best therapeutic option for hyperphosphatemia.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review examines available treatment strategies for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients and new emerging treatments, emphasizing the latest inhibitors of active phosphate absorption.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Despite the numerous compounds available, managing hyperphosphatemia in CKD remains challenging. While many phosphate binders exist, they often have limitations and side effects. Aluminum carries significant toxicity risks. Calcium-based binders are effective but can cause hypercalcemia and vascular calcification. Lanthanum is absorbed in the gut, but its long-term tissue deposition appears clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer reduces vascular calcification but has inconclusive data and gastrointestinal side effects. Iron-based binders are effective but may cause gastrointestinal discomfort and lack long-term outcome data. New inhibitors of intestinal phosphate absorption show promise with low pill burden but need more clinical validation. Although these newer compounds might eventually improve phosphate management in CKD patients, enhancing adherence and reducing pill burden, future studies are required to elucidate the best treatment for hyperphosphatemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"85-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2441328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2441328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Update on current and emerging treatment paradigms for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease.
Introduction: Hyperphosphatemia in advanced CKD often accompanies high PTH and FGF23 levels, impaired bone mineralization, ectopic calcifications, and increased cardiovascular risks. Novel treatments are now available to lower serum phosphorus effectively. However, safety, tolerability, and patient adherence must be evaluated to determine the best therapeutic option for hyperphosphatemia.
Areas covered: This review examines available treatment strategies for hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients and new emerging treatments, emphasizing the latest inhibitors of active phosphate absorption.
Expert opinion: Despite the numerous compounds available, managing hyperphosphatemia in CKD remains challenging. While many phosphate binders exist, they often have limitations and side effects. Aluminum carries significant toxicity risks. Calcium-based binders are effective but can cause hypercalcemia and vascular calcification. Lanthanum is absorbed in the gut, but its long-term tissue deposition appears clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer reduces vascular calcification but has inconclusive data and gastrointestinal side effects. Iron-based binders are effective but may cause gastrointestinal discomfort and lack long-term outcome data. New inhibitors of intestinal phosphate absorption show promise with low pill burden but need more clinical validation. Although these newer compounds might eventually improve phosphate management in CKD patients, enhancing adherence and reducing pill burden, future studies are required to elucidate the best treatment for hyperphosphatemia.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.