教授政治话题的快速反应课程方法。

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1
Janet B Henrich, Katherine A Gielissen, Cynthia F McNamara, Shefali Pathy, Allister F Hirschman, Joseph X Canarie, Mukta Dhond, Ilana Richman, Tracy L Rabin, Luz Vasquez, John Encandela
{"title":"教授政治话题的快速反应课程方法。","authors":"Janet B Henrich, Katherine A Gielissen, Cynthia F McNamara, Shefali Pathy, Allister F Hirschman, Joseph X Canarie, Mukta Dhond, Ilana Richman, Tracy L Rabin, Luz Vasquez, John Encandela","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Residency education in the United States faces challenges from evolving external influence on evidence-based reproductive and gender-affirming health care (R/GAHC). Curricula must incorporate information and resources to assist residents in navigating changes. <b>Objective</b> To illustrate a process for expeditiously adapting curriculum in response to changing laws affecting R/GAHC. <b>Methods</b> A 6-step model was used to tailor an R/GAHC module within an existing curriculum. Steps included identifying the medical education problem; conducting needs assessments with residents and educators; and designing, implementing, and evaluating the curriculum. The module was piloted in 2022 with internal medicine residents in 3 training programs at one institution during 4-hour small-group academic half-days. We evaluated the module's feasibility with time and cost analysis and residents' self-reported readiness to provide R/GAHC through essential tasks and knowledge. We evaluated acceptability by assessing whether residents and educators engaged in and completed the curriculum, and evidence of administrative support. <b>Results</b> A needs assessment clarified the educational problem as an urgent need to educate residents on the implications of legal changes affecting R/GAHC. Curriculum planning occurred over 2 months and implementation over 3 months. Of 175 eligible residents, 164 (94%) were trained. Evaluation showed that the curriculum was well received by residents, whose post-training self-assessment showed readiness to provide R/GAHC. Faculty time to plan and implement the module was substantial (estimated 207 person hours), yet participation was consistent, and administrative commitment constant. <b>Conclusions</b> We demonstrated a generalizable approach for expeditiously tailoring curricula to prepare residents to navigate changing laws affecting health care provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 6","pages":"723-729"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11641876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rapid-Response Curricular Approach to Teaching Politically Charged Topics.\",\"authors\":\"Janet B Henrich, Katherine A Gielissen, Cynthia F McNamara, Shefali Pathy, Allister F Hirschman, Joseph X Canarie, Mukta Dhond, Ilana Richman, Tracy L Rabin, Luz Vasquez, John Encandela\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Residency education in the United States faces challenges from evolving external influence on evidence-based reproductive and gender-affirming health care (R/GAHC). Curricula must incorporate information and resources to assist residents in navigating changes. <b>Objective</b> To illustrate a process for expeditiously adapting curriculum in response to changing laws affecting R/GAHC. <b>Methods</b> A 6-step model was used to tailor an R/GAHC module within an existing curriculum. Steps included identifying the medical education problem; conducting needs assessments with residents and educators; and designing, implementing, and evaluating the curriculum. The module was piloted in 2022 with internal medicine residents in 3 training programs at one institution during 4-hour small-group academic half-days. We evaluated the module's feasibility with time and cost analysis and residents' self-reported readiness to provide R/GAHC through essential tasks and knowledge. We evaluated acceptability by assessing whether residents and educators engaged in and completed the curriculum, and evidence of administrative support. <b>Results</b> A needs assessment clarified the educational problem as an urgent need to educate residents on the implications of legal changes affecting R/GAHC. Curriculum planning occurred over 2 months and implementation over 3 months. Of 175 eligible residents, 164 (94%) were trained. Evaluation showed that the curriculum was well received by residents, whose post-training self-assessment showed readiness to provide R/GAHC. Faculty time to plan and implement the module was substantial (estimated 207 person hours), yet participation was consistent, and administrative commitment constant. <b>Conclusions</b> We demonstrated a generalizable approach for expeditiously tailoring curricula to prepare residents to navigate changing laws affecting health care provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"723-729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11641876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00140.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国住院医师教育面临着不断变化的外部影响对循证生殖和性别肯定保健(R/GAHC)的挑战。课程必须包含信息和资源,以帮助居民导航变化。目的阐述快速调整课程以适应影响R/GAHC的法律变化的过程。方法采用6步模型在现有课程中定制R/GAHC模块。步骤包括确定医学教育问题;与居民和教育工作者一起进行需求评估;以及课程的设计、实施和评估。该模块于2022年在一家机构进行了试点,内科住院医生在4小时的小组学术半天时间内参加了3个培训项目。我们通过时间和成本分析以及居民通过基本任务和知识提供R/GAHC的自我报告来评估该模块的可行性。我们通过评估居民和教育工作者是否参与和完成课程,以及行政支持的证据来评估可接受性。结果需求评估明确了教育问题,迫切需要教育居民了解影响R/GAHC的法律变化的含义。课程规划耗时2个月,实施耗时3个月。在175名符合条件的居民中,164名(94%)接受了培训。评估显示,居民对课程的接受程度很高,他们在培训后的自我评估表明他们已经准备好提供R/GAHC。教师计划和实施该模块的时间相当可观(估计为207人小时),但参与是一致的,行政承诺是不变的。结论:我们展示了一种可推广的方法,可以快速定制课程,使居民准备好应对影响医疗保健提供的不断变化的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Rapid-Response Curricular Approach to Teaching Politically Charged Topics.

Background Residency education in the United States faces challenges from evolving external influence on evidence-based reproductive and gender-affirming health care (R/GAHC). Curricula must incorporate information and resources to assist residents in navigating changes. Objective To illustrate a process for expeditiously adapting curriculum in response to changing laws affecting R/GAHC. Methods A 6-step model was used to tailor an R/GAHC module within an existing curriculum. Steps included identifying the medical education problem; conducting needs assessments with residents and educators; and designing, implementing, and evaluating the curriculum. The module was piloted in 2022 with internal medicine residents in 3 training programs at one institution during 4-hour small-group academic half-days. We evaluated the module's feasibility with time and cost analysis and residents' self-reported readiness to provide R/GAHC through essential tasks and knowledge. We evaluated acceptability by assessing whether residents and educators engaged in and completed the curriculum, and evidence of administrative support. Results A needs assessment clarified the educational problem as an urgent need to educate residents on the implications of legal changes affecting R/GAHC. Curriculum planning occurred over 2 months and implementation over 3 months. Of 175 eligible residents, 164 (94%) were trained. Evaluation showed that the curriculum was well received by residents, whose post-training self-assessment showed readiness to provide R/GAHC. Faculty time to plan and implement the module was substantial (estimated 207 person hours), yet participation was consistent, and administrative commitment constant. Conclusions We demonstrated a generalizable approach for expeditiously tailoring curricula to prepare residents to navigate changing laws affecting health care provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
期刊最新文献
A Residency Elective in Sustainable Health Care. Adapting the Planetary Health Report Card for Graduate Medical Training Programs. An Interprofessional Approach to Prepare Medical Residents and Fellows to Address Climate- and Environment-Related Health Risks. Assessing Physician Climate Change Competency via Medical Licensing and Board Examinations: Lessons From Integrating Ultrasound Topics in Emergency Medicine. Climate Change Curriculum in a Network of US Family Medicine Residency Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1