Dheeman Futela, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Ezgi Guler, Brandon Declouette, Christopher Hoimes, Nikhil H Ramaiya
{"title":"将肿瘤突变负荷作为免疫检查点抑制剂放射反应的标志物。","authors":"Dheeman Futela, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Ezgi Guler, Brandon Declouette, Christopher Hoimes, Nikhil H Ramaiya","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, out of 1044 patients treated with ICIs between January 2010 and November 2018, 75 patients (38 males and 37 females) with a mean age of 62 (range 22-87) years, who had information about TMB and adequate imaging, were included. Imaging response was determined according to iRECIST criteria. Predictors of objective response were analysed using non-parametric tests, and progression-free survival and overall survival were analysed using log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median TMB was 7.2 mutations/mb [interquartile range: 4-13.5]. The objective radiologic response rate according to iRECIST was 26.7 % (20 patients) and the median time to best response was 61 days [IQR: 47-88 days]. Median TMB in responders (12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb) was significantly higher than in non-responders (6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb) (p = 0.0293). Median TMB was higher in responders in the subgroup of patients treated with Nivolumab (20 vs 4 muts/mb, P = .0043), but not significantly in those treated with Pembrolizumab (9 vs 6 muts/mb, P = .211). There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.37, Log-Rank) or OS (p = 0.053, Log-Rank) between TMB low and high groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher TMB was associated with objective response to ICI, however, TMB was an imperfect biomarker for PFS and OS in our study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93969,"journal":{"name":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor mutational burden as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Dheeman Futela, Sree Harsha Tirumani, Ezgi Guler, Brandon Declouette, Christopher Hoimes, Nikhil H Ramaiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single tertiary cancer center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, out of 1044 patients treated with ICIs between January 2010 and November 2018, 75 patients (38 males and 37 females) with a mean age of 62 (range 22-87) years, who had information about TMB and adequate imaging, were included. Imaging response was determined according to iRECIST criteria. Predictors of objective response were analysed using non-parametric tests, and progression-free survival and overall survival were analysed using log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median TMB was 7.2 mutations/mb [interquartile range: 4-13.5]. The objective radiologic response rate according to iRECIST was 26.7 % (20 patients) and the median time to best response was 61 days [IQR: 47-88 days]. Median TMB in responders (12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb) was significantly higher than in non-responders (6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb) (p = 0.0293). Median TMB was higher in responders in the subgroup of patients treated with Nivolumab (20 vs 4 muts/mb, P = .0043), but not significantly in those treated with Pembrolizumab (9 vs 6 muts/mb, P = .211). There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.37, Log-Rank) or OS (p = 0.053, Log-Rank) between TMB low and high groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher TMB was associated with objective response to ICI, however, TMB was an imperfect biomarker for PFS and OS in our study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current problems in diagnostic radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current problems in diagnostic radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.12.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tumor mutational burden as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of tumor mutational burden (TMB) as a marker for radiologic response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy at a single tertiary cancer center.
Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, out of 1044 patients treated with ICIs between January 2010 and November 2018, 75 patients (38 males and 37 females) with a mean age of 62 (range 22-87) years, who had information about TMB and adequate imaging, were included. Imaging response was determined according to iRECIST criteria. Predictors of objective response were analysed using non-parametric tests, and progression-free survival and overall survival were analysed using log-rank test.
Results: Median TMB was 7.2 mutations/mb [interquartile range: 4-13.5]. The objective radiologic response rate according to iRECIST was 26.7 % (20 patients) and the median time to best response was 61 days [IQR: 47-88 days]. Median TMB in responders (12.5 [IQR: 5-18] muts/mb) was significantly higher than in non-responders (6 [IQR: 3-12] muts/mb) (p = 0.0293). Median TMB was higher in responders in the subgroup of patients treated with Nivolumab (20 vs 4 muts/mb, P = .0043), but not significantly in those treated with Pembrolizumab (9 vs 6 muts/mb, P = .211). There was no difference in PFS (p = 0.37, Log-Rank) or OS (p = 0.053, Log-Rank) between TMB low and high groups.
Conclusion: Higher TMB was associated with objective response to ICI, however, TMB was an imperfect biomarker for PFS and OS in our study.