Ting Li, Nadeer M Gharaibeh, Shanru Jia, Zierdi Qinaer, Saidaitiguli Aihemaiti, AiShengBaTi HaNaTe, Gang Wu
{"title":"YOLOv8算法辅助检测膝关节MRI图像上髌骨不稳或脱位。","authors":"Ting Li, Nadeer M Gharaibeh, Shanru Jia, Zierdi Qinaer, Saidaitiguli Aihemaiti, AiShengBaTi HaNaTe, Gang Wu","doi":"10.1177/02841851241300617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellar instability (PI) or patellar dislocation (PD) is challenging to diagnose accurately based on medical history and clinical manifestations alone. While X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly employed for detecting PI or PD, computer vision has not yet been widely utilized for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the feasibility of computer vision, specifically the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, in identifying patellar instability or dislocation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 550 patients (190 diagnosed with patellar instability or dislocation) were divided into a training set (n = 360), validation set (n = 90), and external test set (n = 100). Four indicators were measured on transverse knee MRI scans to determine the presence of patellar instability, and 450 images were labeled using Labelme software. YOLO version 8 (YOLOv8) was refined using these labeled images and validated on 100 unlabeled images. The diagnostic accuracy of YOLOv8 was compared with that of a junior radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the refined YOLO model and the junior radiologist were 62%, 97%, and 83%, and 62%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Although the YOLO model demonstrated slightly higher accuracy, the difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = 0.093). The YOLO model required approximately 14.01 ± 10.34 ms to interpret each image, significantly shorter than the 9.55 ± 2.39 s required by the radiologist (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The refined YOLOv8 model is not inferior to junior radiologists in identifying patellar instability or dislocation and offers a significantly faster interpretation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241300617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YOLOv8 algorithm-aided detection of patellar instability or dislocation on knee joint MRI images.\",\"authors\":\"Ting Li, Nadeer M Gharaibeh, Shanru Jia, Zierdi Qinaer, Saidaitiguli Aihemaiti, AiShengBaTi HaNaTe, Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851241300617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patellar instability (PI) or patellar dislocation (PD) is challenging to diagnose accurately based on medical history and clinical manifestations alone. While X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly employed for detecting PI or PD, computer vision has not yet been widely utilized for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the feasibility of computer vision, specifically the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, in identifying patellar instability or dislocation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 550 patients (190 diagnosed with patellar instability or dislocation) were divided into a training set (n = 360), validation set (n = 90), and external test set (n = 100). Four indicators were measured on transverse knee MRI scans to determine the presence of patellar instability, and 450 images were labeled using Labelme software. YOLO version 8 (YOLOv8) was refined using these labeled images and validated on 100 unlabeled images. The diagnostic accuracy of YOLOv8 was compared with that of a junior radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the refined YOLO model and the junior radiologist were 62%, 97%, and 83%, and 62%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Although the YOLO model demonstrated slightly higher accuracy, the difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> = 0.093). The YOLO model required approximately 14.01 ± 10.34 ms to interpret each image, significantly shorter than the 9.55 ± 2.39 s required by the radiologist (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The refined YOLOv8 model is not inferior to junior radiologists in identifying patellar instability or dislocation and offers a significantly faster interpretation time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851241300617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241300617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241300617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:髌骨不稳(PI)或髌骨脱位(PD)仅根据病史和临床表现难以准确诊断。虽然x射线、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)通常用于检测PI或PD,但计算机视觉尚未广泛用于此目的。目的:探讨计算机视觉,特别是You Only Look Once (YOLO)算法在识别髌骨不稳定或脱位中的可行性。材料和方法:共550例患者(其中诊断为髌骨不稳或脱位的190例)分为训练集(n = 360)、验证集(n = 90)和外部测试集(n = 100)。在膝关节横向MRI扫描中测量四项指标以确定髌骨不稳定的存在,并使用Labelme软件标记450张图像。YOLO版本8 (YOLOv8)使用这些标记的图像进行了改进,并在100张未标记的图像上进行了验证。将YOLOv8的诊断准确性与初级放射科医生的诊断准确性进行比较。结果:改进后的YOLO模型和初级放射科医师的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为62%、97%和83%,62%、82%和74%。虽然YOLO模型的准确率略高,但差异没有达到统计学意义(P = 0.093)。YOLO模型解译每张图像所需时间约为14.01±10.34 ms,明显短于放射科医生所需的9.55±2.39 s (P结论:改进的YOLOv8模型在识别髌骨不稳定或脱位方面并不逊色于初级放射科医生,并且解译时间明显更快。
YOLOv8 algorithm-aided detection of patellar instability or dislocation on knee joint MRI images.
Background: Patellar instability (PI) or patellar dislocation (PD) is challenging to diagnose accurately based on medical history and clinical manifestations alone. While X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly employed for detecting PI or PD, computer vision has not yet been widely utilized for this purpose.
Purpose: To explore the feasibility of computer vision, specifically the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, in identifying patellar instability or dislocation.
Material and methods: A total of 550 patients (190 diagnosed with patellar instability or dislocation) were divided into a training set (n = 360), validation set (n = 90), and external test set (n = 100). Four indicators were measured on transverse knee MRI scans to determine the presence of patellar instability, and 450 images were labeled using Labelme software. YOLO version 8 (YOLOv8) was refined using these labeled images and validated on 100 unlabeled images. The diagnostic accuracy of YOLOv8 was compared with that of a junior radiologist.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the refined YOLO model and the junior radiologist were 62%, 97%, and 83%, and 62%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Although the YOLO model demonstrated slightly higher accuracy, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.093). The YOLO model required approximately 14.01 ± 10.34 ms to interpret each image, significantly shorter than the 9.55 ± 2.39 s required by the radiologist (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The refined YOLOv8 model is not inferior to junior radiologists in identifying patellar instability or dislocation and offers a significantly faster interpretation time.
期刊介绍:
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.