Anastasia Maklennan, Roberta Borg-Bartolo, Andrea Roccuzzo, Claudia Salerno, Maria Katharina Raabe, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Richard Johannes Wierichs, Marcela Esteves-Oliveira, Rodrigo A Giacaman, Guglielmo Campus
{"title":"全球中老年牙根龋患病率分布荟萃分析。","authors":"Anastasia Maklennan, Roberta Borg-Bartolo, Andrea Roccuzzo, Claudia Salerno, Maria Katharina Raabe, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Richard Johannes Wierichs, Marcela Esteves-Oliveira, Rodrigo A Giacaman, Guglielmo Campus","doi":"10.1159/000542783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Root caries (RC) remains a global health problem leading to negative impacts on an elderly person's well-being causing oral health-related quality of life issues, such as inadequate nutrition and detrimental oral functionality. The present systematic review with meta-analysis is designed to synthesize existing research findings on the prevalence and experience of root caries globally over the past 30 years. It aims to describe its distribution by country and explore its links with various socioeconomic indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selection criteria: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were screened for observational epidemiological studies (cross-sectional and cohort studies) reporting the prevalence of RC and/or mean RC experience between 1990 and 2023. No languages were applied. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were done in duplicate. Risk of bias was graded with customized quality assessment tools (Study Quality Assessment Tools NHLBI, NIH).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>studies reporting on (1) root-caries experience (mean and SD) and (2) root-caries prevalence (%) were used to synthesize the results. It was assessed as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (RDMFT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 publications were included in the descriptive analysis; the estimated overall pooled mean RC was 2.87 teeth and the global estimated random-effects pooled RC prevalence was 41%. Low gross national income (GNI) countries reported a low mean number of RC (1.35 GNI <USD 5,000), while high GNI countries reported a higher mean number of RC (3.45 GNI USD 10,000-USD 19,999). Countries of higher inequalities (Gini index) reported lower means medium RC (1.98 teeth) than countries with no inequalities (4.90 teeth).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the high caries burden among adult population globally by estimating overall trends and comparing against factors including area, GNI, and Gini index. The large magnitude of these inequities indicates that oral health equity can only be achieved taking into account socioeconomic factors on a global scale. The lack of uniform data collecting among studies as well as knowledge gap regarding the incidence and experience of RC in different countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Global Distribution of Root-Caries Prevalence in Middle-Aged and Elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Maklennan, Roberta Borg-Bartolo, Andrea Roccuzzo, Claudia Salerno, Maria Katharina Raabe, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, Richard Johannes Wierichs, Marcela Esteves-Oliveira, Rodrigo A Giacaman, Guglielmo Campus\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Root caries (RC) remains a global health problem leading to negative impacts on an elderly person's well-being causing oral health-related quality of life issues, such as inadequate nutrition and detrimental oral functionality. The present systematic review with meta-analysis is designed to synthesize existing research findings on the prevalence and experience of root caries globally over the past 30 years. It aims to describe its distribution by country and explore its links with various socioeconomic indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selection criteria: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were screened for observational epidemiological studies (cross-sectional and cohort studies) reporting the prevalence of RC and/or mean RC experience between 1990 and 2023. No languages were applied. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were done in duplicate. Risk of bias was graded with customized quality assessment tools (Study Quality Assessment Tools NHLBI, NIH).</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>studies reporting on (1) root-caries experience (mean and SD) and (2) root-caries prevalence (%) were used to synthesize the results. It was assessed as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (RDMFT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 publications were included in the descriptive analysis; the estimated overall pooled mean RC was 2.87 teeth and the global estimated random-effects pooled RC prevalence was 41%. Low gross national income (GNI) countries reported a low mean number of RC (1.35 GNI <USD 5,000), while high GNI countries reported a higher mean number of RC (3.45 GNI USD 10,000-USD 19,999). Countries of higher inequalities (Gini index) reported lower means medium RC (1.98 teeth) than countries with no inequalities (4.90 teeth).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the high caries burden among adult population globally by estimating overall trends and comparing against factors including area, GNI, and Gini index. The large magnitude of these inequities indicates that oral health equity can only be achieved taking into account socioeconomic factors on a global scale. The lack of uniform data collecting among studies as well as knowledge gap regarding the incidence and experience of RC in different countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542783\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-Analysis of Global Distribution of Root-Caries Prevalence in Middle-Aged and Elderly.
Introduction: Root caries (RC) remains a global health problem leading to negative impacts on an elderly person's well-being causing oral health-related quality of life issues, such as inadequate nutrition and detrimental oral functionality. The present systematic review with meta-analysis is designed to synthesize existing research findings on the prevalence and experience of root caries globally over the past 30 years. It aims to describe its distribution by country and explore its links with various socioeconomic indicators.
Methods: Selection criteria: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) were screened for observational epidemiological studies (cross-sectional and cohort studies) reporting the prevalence of RC and/or mean RC experience between 1990 and 2023. No languages were applied. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were done in duplicate. Risk of bias was graded with customized quality assessment tools (Study Quality Assessment Tools NHLBI, NIH).
Data collection and analysis: studies reporting on (1) root-caries experience (mean and SD) and (2) root-caries prevalence (%) were used to synthesize the results. It was assessed as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (RDMFT).
Results: A total of 91 publications were included in the descriptive analysis; the estimated overall pooled mean RC was 2.87 teeth and the global estimated random-effects pooled RC prevalence was 41%. Low gross national income (GNI) countries reported a low mean number of RC (1.35 GNI
Conclusion: This study highlights the high caries burden among adult population globally by estimating overall trends and comparing against factors including area, GNI, and Gini index. The large magnitude of these inequities indicates that oral health equity can only be achieved taking into account socioeconomic factors on a global scale. The lack of uniform data collecting among studies as well as knowledge gap regarding the incidence and experience of RC in different countries.
期刊介绍:
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.