德国学龄儿童积极与消极父母教养行为量表(FPNE)的心理测量特征。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9
Vanessa Holas, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Christina Dose, Stephanie Gebauer, Christopher Hautmann, Anja Görtz-Dorten, Lea Teresa Kohl, Julia Plück, Anne-Katrin Treier, Tobias Banaschewski, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Veit Rößner, Charlotte Hanisch, Michael Kölch, Martin Holtmann, Katja Becker, Tobias Renner, Julia Geissler, Jasmin Wenning, Michael Huss, Luise Poustka, Manfred Döpfner
{"title":"德国学龄儿童积极与消极父母教养行为量表(FPNE)的心理测量特征。","authors":"Vanessa Holas, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Christina Dose, Stephanie Gebauer, Christopher Hautmann, Anja Görtz-Dorten, Lea Teresa Kohl, Julia Plück, Anne-Katrin Treier, Tobias Banaschewski, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Veit Rößner, Charlotte Hanisch, Michael Kölch, Martin Holtmann, Katja Becker, Tobias Renner, Julia Geissler, Jasmin Wenning, Michael Huss, Luise Poustka, Manfred Döpfner","doi":"10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9934,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"18 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the parent-rated assessment scale of positive and negative parenting behavior (FPNE) in a German sample of school-aged children.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Holas, Ann-Kathrin Thöne, Christina Dose, Stephanie Gebauer, Christopher Hautmann, Anja Görtz-Dorten, Lea Teresa Kohl, Julia Plück, Anne-Katrin Treier, Tobias Banaschewski, Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer, Veit Rößner, Charlotte Hanisch, Michael Kölch, Martin Holtmann, Katja Becker, Tobias Renner, Julia Geissler, Jasmin Wenning, Michael Huss, Luise Poustka, Manfred Döpfner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00850-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是开发和心理计量学评价父母评定量表,包括父母养育的积极和消极维度。采用5项研究,共纳入1879名学龄儿童(6.00 ~ 12.11岁),对积极与消极父母教养行为评估量表(FPNE)的析因效度、信度、测量不方差、潜在均值差异和结构效度进行检验。方法:采用探索性因子分析(EFA)对第一个随机分割的一半样本进行分析,后一半样本采用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)。进行测量不变性检验以评估性别和年龄之间的因素结构等效性。结果:EFA结果支持双因素结构,CFA结果显示有两个相关因素(积极父母教养、消极父母教养)的模型,包括23个项目,模型拟合良好,心理测量学性质良好。ESEM并没有产生一个明显更好的模型拟合。内部一致性是可以接受的。FPNE和类似构念之间的低至中等相关性证明了足够的并发效度。因子结构在不同年龄和性别间呈构型、度量、标量不变。潜在平均差异测试显示,年龄较大的孩子在消极父母教育方面的得分明显高于年龄较小的孩子,而男孩在积极父母教育方面的得分低于女孩,而在消极父母教育方面的得分高于女孩。所有的效应量都很小。结论:FPNE是一种可靠、有效的亲子关系评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric properties of the parent-rated assessment scale of positive and negative parenting behavior (FPNE) in a German sample of school-aged children.

Background: The aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a parent-rated parenting assessment scale including positive and negative dimensions of parenting. Factorial validity, reliability, measurement invariance, latent mean differences and construct validity of the Assessment Scale of Positive and Negative Parenting Behavior (FPNE) were tested in a pooled sample of five studies of 1,879 school-aged children (6.00 to 12.11 years).

Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on a first randomized split-half sample, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) were conducted in the second half of the sample. Measurement invariance tests were conducted to assess factor structure equivalence across gender and age.

Results: The EFA results supported a two-factor structure and the CFA results revealed a model with two correlated factors (Positive Parenting, Negative Parenting), which included 23 items and showed acceptable model fit and good psychometric properties. ESEM did not yield a model with significantly better model fit. Internal consistencies were acceptable. Adequate concurrent validity was demonstrated by low to moderate correlations between the FPNE and similar constructs. The factor structure was invariant (configural, metric, scalar) across different age groups and gender. Tests of latent mean differences revealed that older children scored significantly higher on negative parenting than younger children, while boys showed lower levels of positive parenting and higher levels of negative parenting compared to girls. All effect sizes were small.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the FPNE is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of parenting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health PEDIATRICSPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, the official journal of the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, is an open access, online journal that provides an international platform for rapid and comprehensive scientific communication on child and adolescent mental health across different cultural backgrounds. CAPMH serves as a scientifically rigorous and broadly open forum for both interdisciplinary and cross-cultural exchange of research information, involving psychiatrists, paediatricians, psychologists, neuroscientists, and allied disciplines. The journal focusses on improving the knowledge base for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions in children and adolescents, and aims to integrate basic science, clinical research and the practical implementation of research findings. In addition, aspects which are still underrepresented in the traditional journals such as neurobiology and neuropsychology of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence are considered.
期刊最新文献
The association of chronotype, sleep duration and trajectories of health-risk behaviors among college students: a cohort study. The effects of training female students in emotion regulation techniques on their social problem-solving skills and social anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Mental health in children with and without ADHD: the role of physical activity and parental nativity. Validity, reliability and clinical utility of ASSIST-Y in assessing risk of substance-related harm and dependence in Spanish male adolescents. The relationship between callous-unemotional traits and internalizing psychopathology in adolescent psychiatric inpatients: a network analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1