超声引导下经腹平面阻滞(UG-TAPB)减少疼痛、阿片类药物消耗和PONV,并与接受减肥手术的患者更快恢复相关:意大利一个大容量中心的回顾性分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5
Massimiliano Bissolati, Stefano De Ruberto, Aldo Antonio Ferreri, Elisa Galfrascoli, Maria Paola Giusti, Marco Antonio Zappa
{"title":"超声引导下经腹平面阻滞(UG-TAPB)减少疼痛、阿片类药物消耗和PONV,并与接受减肥手术的患者更快恢复相关:意大利一个大容量中心的回顾性分析。","authors":"Massimiliano Bissolati, Stefano De Ruberto, Aldo Antonio Ferreri, Elisa Galfrascoli, Maria Paola Giusti, Marco Antonio Zappa","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (UG-TAPB) reduces post-operative pain better than i.v. painkillers in patients operated with laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to compare the postoperative course of patients undergoing bariatric surgery treated with UG-TABP to that of patients treated with standard analgesic therapy. We retrospectively analyzed patients who have undergone bariatric surgery from November 2021 to April 2023, comparing patients treated with UG-TAPB (Group A) with patients treated with standard i.v. analgesic therapy (Group B). Post-operative numeric-pain rating scale (NRS), nausea and vomiting (PONV), opioid and antiemetic consumption were compared between the two groups until postoperative day (POD) 2. 41 patients underwent bariatric surgery in the aforementioned period. 11 patients were included in group A, whereas 30 patients were included in group B. The two groups were homogeneous for age, BMI, surgery type and comorbidities. Females were more common in Group B (64% vs. 80%; p = 0.019). NRS was significantly lower in Group A than Group B from POD0 to POD2 (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2; p = 0.001 and 1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3; p < 0.001 after surgery and on POD2 8 pm, respectively). On POD 0, opioid consumption (9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011 and 9% vs. 47%; p = 0.033 after surgery and at 8 pm, respectively), PONV (27% vs. 90%; p < 0.001 and 9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011) and antiemetic consumption (36% vs. 90%; p = 0.001 and 9% vs. 53%; p = 0.014) were higher in Group B. Patients in Group A can be discharged earlier than patients in Group B (1.45 ± 0.82 vs. 2.67 ± 1.39 days; p = 0.005). UG-TAPB is associated with a better and faster recovery after bariatric surgery and should be considered in ERABS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound guided-transabdominal plane block (UG-TAPB) reduces pain, opioid consumption and PONV, and is associated with faster recovery for patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis in a high-volume Italian center.\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Bissolati, Stefano De Ruberto, Aldo Antonio Ferreri, Elisa Galfrascoli, Maria Paola Giusti, Marco Antonio Zappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (UG-TAPB) reduces post-operative pain better than i.v. painkillers in patients operated with laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to compare the postoperative course of patients undergoing bariatric surgery treated with UG-TABP to that of patients treated with standard analgesic therapy. We retrospectively analyzed patients who have undergone bariatric surgery from November 2021 to April 2023, comparing patients treated with UG-TAPB (Group A) with patients treated with standard i.v. analgesic therapy (Group B). Post-operative numeric-pain rating scale (NRS), nausea and vomiting (PONV), opioid and antiemetic consumption were compared between the two groups until postoperative day (POD) 2. 41 patients underwent bariatric surgery in the aforementioned period. 11 patients were included in group A, whereas 30 patients were included in group B. The two groups were homogeneous for age, BMI, surgery type and comorbidities. Females were more common in Group B (64% vs. 80%; p = 0.019). NRS was significantly lower in Group A than Group B from POD0 to POD2 (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2; p = 0.001 and 1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3; p < 0.001 after surgery and on POD2 8 pm, respectively). On POD 0, opioid consumption (9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011 and 9% vs. 47%; p = 0.033 after surgery and at 8 pm, respectively), PONV (27% vs. 90%; p < 0.001 and 9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011) and antiemetic consumption (36% vs. 90%; p = 0.001 and 9% vs. 53%; p = 0.014) were higher in Group B. Patients in Group A can be discharged earlier than patients in Group B (1.45 ± 0.82 vs. 2.67 ± 1.39 days; p = 0.005). UG-TAPB is associated with a better and faster recovery after bariatric surgery and should be considered in ERABS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02037-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞(UG-TAPB)比静脉注射止痛药更能减轻腹腔镜手术患者的术后疼痛。本研究旨在比较接受 UG-TABP 治疗的减肥手术患者与接受标准镇痛治疗的患者的术后疗程。我们对 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月期间接受减肥手术的患者进行了回顾性分析,比较了接受 UG-TAPB 治疗的患者(A 组)和接受标准静脉镇痛治疗的患者(B 组)。比较两组患者的术后疼痛评分量表(NRS)、恶心和呕吐(PONV)、阿片类药物和止吐药的用量,直至术后第 2 天(POD)。两组患者的年龄、体重指数、手术类型和合并症均相同。女性在 B 组中更常见(64% 对 80%;P = 0.019)。从 POD0 到 POD2,A 组的 NRS 明显低于 B 组(3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2;p = 0.001 和 1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3;p = 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound guided-transabdominal plane block (UG-TAPB) reduces pain, opioid consumption and PONV, and is associated with faster recovery for patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis in a high-volume Italian center.

Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (UG-TAPB) reduces post-operative pain better than i.v. painkillers in patients operated with laparoscopic surgery. This study aims to compare the postoperative course of patients undergoing bariatric surgery treated with UG-TABP to that of patients treated with standard analgesic therapy. We retrospectively analyzed patients who have undergone bariatric surgery from November 2021 to April 2023, comparing patients treated with UG-TAPB (Group A) with patients treated with standard i.v. analgesic therapy (Group B). Post-operative numeric-pain rating scale (NRS), nausea and vomiting (PONV), opioid and antiemetic consumption were compared between the two groups until postoperative day (POD) 2. 41 patients underwent bariatric surgery in the aforementioned period. 11 patients were included in group A, whereas 30 patients were included in group B. The two groups were homogeneous for age, BMI, surgery type and comorbidities. Females were more common in Group B (64% vs. 80%; p = 0.019). NRS was significantly lower in Group A than Group B from POD0 to POD2 (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2; p = 0.001 and 1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 3.1 ± 1.3; p < 0.001 after surgery and on POD2 8 pm, respectively). On POD 0, opioid consumption (9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011 and 9% vs. 47%; p = 0.033 after surgery and at 8 pm, respectively), PONV (27% vs. 90%; p < 0.001 and 9% vs. 57%; p = 0.011) and antiemetic consumption (36% vs. 90%; p = 0.001 and 9% vs. 53%; p = 0.014) were higher in Group B. Patients in Group A can be discharged earlier than patients in Group B (1.45 ± 0.82 vs. 2.67 ± 1.39 days; p = 0.005). UG-TAPB is associated with a better and faster recovery after bariatric surgery and should be considered in ERABS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of histological features and recurrence risk assessment of papillary thyroid carcinoma according to presurgery FNAC category. A prospective observational study of laparoscopic approaches for suspected gallbladder cancer in Yamaguchi (YPB-002 LAGBY). Outcome prediction after emergency cholecystectomy: performance evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator and the 5-item modified frailty index. Current perspectives on living donor selection in liver transplantation. Textbook outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: age-stratified analysis and predictive factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1