尿蛋白质组学鉴定了脓毒症相关AKI亚表型的不同免疫学特征

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05202-9
Ian B. Stanaway, Eric D. Morrell, F. Linzee Mabrey, Neha A. Sathe, Zoie Bailey, Sarah Speckmaier, Jordan Lo, Leila R. Zelnick, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Carmen Mikacenic, Laura Evans, Mark M. Wurfel, Pavan K. Bhatraju
{"title":"尿蛋白质组学鉴定了脓毒症相关AKI亚表型的不同免疫学特征","authors":"Ian B. Stanaway, Eric D. Morrell, F. Linzee Mabrey, Neha A. Sathe, Zoie Bailey, Sarah Speckmaier, Jordan Lo, Leila R. Zelnick, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Carmen Mikacenic, Laura Evans, Mark M. Wurfel, Pavan K. Bhatraju","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05202-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with sepsis-induced AKI can be classified into two distinct sub-phenotypes (AKI-SP1, AKI-SP2) that differ in clinical outcomes and response to treatment. The biologic mechanisms underlying these sub-phenotypes remains unknown. Our objective was to understand the underlying biology that differentiates AKI sub-phenotypes and associations with kidney outcomes. We prospectively enrolled 173 ICU patients with sepsis from a suspected respiratory infection (87 without AKI and 86 with AKI on enrollment). Among the AKI patients, 66 were classified as AKI-SP1 and 20 as AKI-SP2 using a three-plasma biomarker classifier. Aptamer-based proteomics assessed 5,212 proteins in urine collected on ICU admission. We compared urinary protein abundances between AKI sub-phenotypes, conducted pathway analyses, tested associations with risk of RRT and blood bacteremia, and predicted AKI-SP2 class membership using LASSO. In total, 117 urine proteins were higher in AKI-SP2, 195 were higher in AKI-SP1 (FDR < 0.05). Urinary proteins involved in inflammation and chemoattractant of neutrophils and monocytes (CXCL1 and REG3A) and oxidative stress (SOD2) were abundant in AKI-SP2, while proteins involved in collagen deposition (GP6), podocyte derived (SPOCK2), proliferation of mesenchymal cells (IL11RA), anti-inflammatory (IL10RB and TREM2) were abundant in AKI-SP1. Pathways related to immune response, complement activation and chemokine signaling were upregulated in AKI-SP2 and pathways of cell adhesion were upregulated in AKI-SP1. Overlap was present between urinary proteins that differentiated AKI sub-phenotypes and proteins that differentiated risk of RRT during hospitalization. Variable correlation was found between top aptamers and ELISA based protein assays. A LASSO derived urinary proteomic model to classify AKI-SP2 had a mean AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.69–0.99). Our findings suggest AKI-SP1 is characterized by a reparative, regenerative phenotype and AKI-SP2 is characterized as an immune and inflammatory phenotype associated with blood bacteremia. We identified shared biology between AKI sub-phenotypes and eventual risk of RRT highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Urine proteomics may be used to non-invasively classify SP2 participants.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary proteomics identifies distinct immunological profiles of sepsis associated AKI sub-phenotypes\",\"authors\":\"Ian B. Stanaway, Eric D. Morrell, F. Linzee Mabrey, Neha A. Sathe, Zoie Bailey, Sarah Speckmaier, Jordan Lo, Leila R. Zelnick, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Carmen Mikacenic, Laura Evans, Mark M. Wurfel, Pavan K. Bhatraju\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-024-05202-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients with sepsis-induced AKI can be classified into two distinct sub-phenotypes (AKI-SP1, AKI-SP2) that differ in clinical outcomes and response to treatment. The biologic mechanisms underlying these sub-phenotypes remains unknown. Our objective was to understand the underlying biology that differentiates AKI sub-phenotypes and associations with kidney outcomes. We prospectively enrolled 173 ICU patients with sepsis from a suspected respiratory infection (87 without AKI and 86 with AKI on enrollment). Among the AKI patients, 66 were classified as AKI-SP1 and 20 as AKI-SP2 using a three-plasma biomarker classifier. Aptamer-based proteomics assessed 5,212 proteins in urine collected on ICU admission. We compared urinary protein abundances between AKI sub-phenotypes, conducted pathway analyses, tested associations with risk of RRT and blood bacteremia, and predicted AKI-SP2 class membership using LASSO. In total, 117 urine proteins were higher in AKI-SP2, 195 were higher in AKI-SP1 (FDR < 0.05). Urinary proteins involved in inflammation and chemoattractant of neutrophils and monocytes (CXCL1 and REG3A) and oxidative stress (SOD2) were abundant in AKI-SP2, while proteins involved in collagen deposition (GP6), podocyte derived (SPOCK2), proliferation of mesenchymal cells (IL11RA), anti-inflammatory (IL10RB and TREM2) were abundant in AKI-SP1. Pathways related to immune response, complement activation and chemokine signaling were upregulated in AKI-SP2 and pathways of cell adhesion were upregulated in AKI-SP1. Overlap was present between urinary proteins that differentiated AKI sub-phenotypes and proteins that differentiated risk of RRT during hospitalization. Variable correlation was found between top aptamers and ELISA based protein assays. A LASSO derived urinary proteomic model to classify AKI-SP2 had a mean AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.69–0.99). Our findings suggest AKI-SP1 is characterized by a reparative, regenerative phenotype and AKI-SP2 is characterized as an immune and inflammatory phenotype associated with blood bacteremia. We identified shared biology between AKI sub-phenotypes and eventual risk of RRT highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Urine proteomics may be used to non-invasively classify SP2 participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05202-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05202-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症诱发的 AKI 患者可分为两种不同的亚型(AKI-SP1 和 AKI-SP2),它们的临床结果和对治疗的反应各不相同。这些亚型的生物学机制仍不清楚。我们的目标是了解区分 AKI 亚型的潜在生物学机制以及与肾脏预后的关联。我们前瞻性地招募了 173 名疑似呼吸道感染引起脓毒症的重症监护病房患者(其中 87 名在入院时未发生 AKI,86 名发生了 AKI)。在 AKI 患者中,66 人通过三血浆生物标志物分类器被分为 AKI-SP1 级,20 人分为 AKI-SP2 级。基于色聚体的蛋白质组学评估了 ICU 入院时收集的尿液中的 5,212 种蛋白质。我们比较了 AKI 亚表型之间的尿蛋白丰度,进行了通路分析,测试了与 RRT 和血液菌血症风险的关联,并使用 LASSO 预测了 AKI-SP2 类别成员。共有 117 种尿蛋白在 AKI-SP2 中含量较高,195 种在 AKI-SP1 中含量较高(FDR < 0.05)。AKI-SP2中含有大量参与炎症、中性粒细胞和单核细胞趋化吸引(CXCL1和REG3A)以及氧化应激(SOD2)的尿蛋白,而AKI-SP1中含有大量参与胶原沉积(GP6)、荚膜细胞衍生(SPOCK2)、间充质细胞增殖(IL11RA)和抗炎(IL10RB和TREM2)的蛋白。与免疫反应、补体激活和趋化因子信号转导相关的通路在 AKI-SP2 中上调,而细胞粘附通路在 AKI-SP1 中上调。区分 AKI 亚型的尿液蛋白质与区分住院期间 RRT 风险的蛋白质之间存在重叠。顶级适配体与基于酶联免疫吸附试验的蛋白质检测之间存在不同的相关性。通过 LASSO 得出的尿液蛋白质组模型对 AKI-SP2 进行分类,其平均 AUC 为 0.86(95% CI:0.69-0.99)。我们的研究结果表明,AKI-SP1 具有修复和再生表型的特征,而 AKI-SP2 则具有与血液菌血症相关的免疫和炎症表型的特征。我们发现了 AKI 亚表型与 RRT 最终风险之间的共同生物学特性,并强调了潜在的治疗目标。尿液蛋白质组学可用于对 SP2 参与者进行无创分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urinary proteomics identifies distinct immunological profiles of sepsis associated AKI sub-phenotypes
Patients with sepsis-induced AKI can be classified into two distinct sub-phenotypes (AKI-SP1, AKI-SP2) that differ in clinical outcomes and response to treatment. The biologic mechanisms underlying these sub-phenotypes remains unknown. Our objective was to understand the underlying biology that differentiates AKI sub-phenotypes and associations with kidney outcomes. We prospectively enrolled 173 ICU patients with sepsis from a suspected respiratory infection (87 without AKI and 86 with AKI on enrollment). Among the AKI patients, 66 were classified as AKI-SP1 and 20 as AKI-SP2 using a three-plasma biomarker classifier. Aptamer-based proteomics assessed 5,212 proteins in urine collected on ICU admission. We compared urinary protein abundances between AKI sub-phenotypes, conducted pathway analyses, tested associations with risk of RRT and blood bacteremia, and predicted AKI-SP2 class membership using LASSO. In total, 117 urine proteins were higher in AKI-SP2, 195 were higher in AKI-SP1 (FDR < 0.05). Urinary proteins involved in inflammation and chemoattractant of neutrophils and monocytes (CXCL1 and REG3A) and oxidative stress (SOD2) were abundant in AKI-SP2, while proteins involved in collagen deposition (GP6), podocyte derived (SPOCK2), proliferation of mesenchymal cells (IL11RA), anti-inflammatory (IL10RB and TREM2) were abundant in AKI-SP1. Pathways related to immune response, complement activation and chemokine signaling were upregulated in AKI-SP2 and pathways of cell adhesion were upregulated in AKI-SP1. Overlap was present between urinary proteins that differentiated AKI sub-phenotypes and proteins that differentiated risk of RRT during hospitalization. Variable correlation was found between top aptamers and ELISA based protein assays. A LASSO derived urinary proteomic model to classify AKI-SP2 had a mean AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.69–0.99). Our findings suggest AKI-SP1 is characterized by a reparative, regenerative phenotype and AKI-SP2 is characterized as an immune and inflammatory phenotype associated with blood bacteremia. We identified shared biology between AKI sub-phenotypes and eventual risk of RRT highlighting potential therapeutic targets. Urine proteomics may be used to non-invasively classify SP2 participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cardiovascular effects of lactate in healthy adults: D-lactate, the forgotten enantiomer Rethinking caution: a critical appraisal of extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis Questioning the classification of “high blood flow” versus “low blood flow” ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification The sicker the patient, the higher the mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1