基于晶体的液体膨胀策略在创伤引起的失血性休克的最初几个小时仍然相关吗?

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7
Perrine Tubert, Alexandre Kalimouttou, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Stéphane David, Tobias Gauss
{"title":"基于晶体的液体膨胀策略在创伤引起的失血性休克的最初几个小时仍然相关吗?","authors":"Perrine Tubert, Alexandre Kalimouttou, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Stéphane David, Tobias Gauss","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crystalloid-based fluid resuscitation has long been a cornerstone in the initial management of trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock. However, its benefit is increasingly questioned as it is suspected to increase bleeding and worsen coagulopathy. The emergence of alternative strategies like permissive hypotension and vasopressor use lead to a shift in early trauma care practices. Critical appraisal of current evidence is necessary to guide clinicians and outline research perspectives. Current guidelines for managing trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock suggest titrating fluids and using vasopressors to achieve minimal blood pressure targets until hemorrhage is controlled. In case of traumatic brain injury with severe hemorrhage, blood pressure target increases. The scientific literature supporting these recommendations is limited, and several aspects remain the subject of ongoing scientific debate. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing evidence on low-volume fluid resuscitation during the first hours of trauma management, with an emphasis on its integration with permissive hypotension, vasopressor use and cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. The review also highlights the limitations of current guidelines, particularly the lack of robust evidence supporting specific type of fluid, volumes and administration protocols tailored to specific trauma scenarios and populations. Emerging technologies such as point-of-care diagnostics, integrated monitoring systems, and machine learning hold promise for enhancing clinical decision-making in trauma care. These innovations could play a crucial role, ultimately helping clinicians address critical unanswered questions in trauma management and improve patient survival. Crystalloid-based resuscitation remains relevant in early trauma care, but its application must be reassessed considering recent evidence and evolving practices. Further research is essential to refine fluid resuscitation guidelines, particularly in defining safe fluid volumes and the role of vasopressors. The integration of advanced monitoring technologies may offer new opportunities to optimize trauma care and improve outcomes.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are crystalloid-based fluid expansion strategies still relevant in the first hours of trauma induced hemorrhagic shock?\",\"authors\":\"Perrine Tubert, Alexandre Kalimouttou, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Stéphane David, Tobias Gauss\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crystalloid-based fluid resuscitation has long been a cornerstone in the initial management of trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock. However, its benefit is increasingly questioned as it is suspected to increase bleeding and worsen coagulopathy. The emergence of alternative strategies like permissive hypotension and vasopressor use lead to a shift in early trauma care practices. Critical appraisal of current evidence is necessary to guide clinicians and outline research perspectives. Current guidelines for managing trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock suggest titrating fluids and using vasopressors to achieve minimal blood pressure targets until hemorrhage is controlled. In case of traumatic brain injury with severe hemorrhage, blood pressure target increases. The scientific literature supporting these recommendations is limited, and several aspects remain the subject of ongoing scientific debate. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing evidence on low-volume fluid resuscitation during the first hours of trauma management, with an emphasis on its integration with permissive hypotension, vasopressor use and cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. The review also highlights the limitations of current guidelines, particularly the lack of robust evidence supporting specific type of fluid, volumes and administration protocols tailored to specific trauma scenarios and populations. Emerging technologies such as point-of-care diagnostics, integrated monitoring systems, and machine learning hold promise for enhancing clinical decision-making in trauma care. These innovations could play a crucial role, ultimately helping clinicians address critical unanswered questions in trauma management and improve patient survival. Crystalloid-based resuscitation remains relevant in early trauma care, but its application must be reassessed considering recent evidence and evolving practices. Further research is essential to refine fluid resuscitation guidelines, particularly in defining safe fluid volumes and the role of vasopressors. The integration of advanced monitoring technologies may offer new opportunities to optimize trauma care and improve outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05185-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,以晶体液为基础的液体复苏一直是创伤性失血性休克初期治疗的基石。然而,其益处越来越受到质疑,因为人们怀疑它会增加出血量并加重凝血功能障碍。允许性低血压和使用血管加压素等替代策略的出现导致了早期创伤护理实践的转变。有必要对当前的证据进行严格评估,以指导临床医生并概述研究观点。目前处理创伤引起的失血性休克的指南建议,在出血得到控制之前,通过滴注液体和使用血管加压药来达到最低血压目标。在脑外伤伴严重出血的情况下,血压目标值会增加。支持这些建议的科学文献十分有限,而且有几个方面仍在科学界争论不休。本综述旨在评估有关在创伤救治的最初几个小时内进行低容量液体复苏的现有证据,重点是将其与允许性低血压、血管加压素的使用以及脑外伤时的脑灌注压结合起来。综述还强调了当前指南的局限性,特别是缺乏有力的证据支持针对特定创伤情况和人群的特定液体类型、容量和给药方案。护理点诊断、综合监测系统和机器学习等新兴技术有望加强创伤护理的临床决策。这些创新技术可以发挥关键作用,最终帮助临床医生解决创伤管理中的关键性未决问题,提高患者存活率。以晶体液为基础的复苏在早期创伤救治中仍具有重要意义,但必须根据最新证据和不断变化的实践对其应用进行重新评估。进一步的研究对于完善液体复苏指南至关重要,尤其是在定义安全液体量和血管加压剂的作用方面。整合先进的监测技术可为优化创伤救治和改善预后提供新的机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are crystalloid-based fluid expansion strategies still relevant in the first hours of trauma induced hemorrhagic shock?
Crystalloid-based fluid resuscitation has long been a cornerstone in the initial management of trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock. However, its benefit is increasingly questioned as it is suspected to increase bleeding and worsen coagulopathy. The emergence of alternative strategies like permissive hypotension and vasopressor use lead to a shift in early trauma care practices. Critical appraisal of current evidence is necessary to guide clinicians and outline research perspectives. Current guidelines for managing trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock suggest titrating fluids and using vasopressors to achieve minimal blood pressure targets until hemorrhage is controlled. In case of traumatic brain injury with severe hemorrhage, blood pressure target increases. The scientific literature supporting these recommendations is limited, and several aspects remain the subject of ongoing scientific debate. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing evidence on low-volume fluid resuscitation during the first hours of trauma management, with an emphasis on its integration with permissive hypotension, vasopressor use and cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. The review also highlights the limitations of current guidelines, particularly the lack of robust evidence supporting specific type of fluid, volumes and administration protocols tailored to specific trauma scenarios and populations. Emerging technologies such as point-of-care diagnostics, integrated monitoring systems, and machine learning hold promise for enhancing clinical decision-making in trauma care. These innovations could play a crucial role, ultimately helping clinicians address critical unanswered questions in trauma management and improve patient survival. Crystalloid-based resuscitation remains relevant in early trauma care, but its application must be reassessed considering recent evidence and evolving practices. Further research is essential to refine fluid resuscitation guidelines, particularly in defining safe fluid volumes and the role of vasopressors. The integration of advanced monitoring technologies may offer new opportunities to optimize trauma care and improve outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cardiovascular effects of lactate in healthy adults: D-lactate, the forgotten enantiomer Rethinking caution: a critical appraisal of extracorporeal blood purification in sepsis Questioning the classification of “high blood flow” versus “low blood flow” ECCO₂R in ultra-low tidal volume ventilation studies: a call for functional classification The sicker the patient, the higher the mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1