Pascal François, Geneviève Gauthier, Frédéric Godin, Carlos Octavio Pérez Mendoza
{"title":"深度套期保值和 delta 套期保值之间的区别是统计套利吗?","authors":"Pascal François, Geneviève Gauthier, Frédéric Godin, Carlos Octavio Pérez Mendoza","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2024.106590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Horikawa and Nakagawa (2024) claim that in a complete market admitting statistical arbitrage, the difference between the deep hedging and the replicating portfolio hedging positions is a statistical arbitrage. Deep hedging can thus include an undesirable speculative component. We test whether this remains true in a GARCH-based incomplete market dynamics. We observe that the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging is a speculative overlay if the risk measure considered does not put sufficient relative weight on adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, a suitable choice of risk measure can prevent the deep hedging agent from engaging in speculation.","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging a statistical arbitrage?\",\"authors\":\"Pascal François, Geneviève Gauthier, Frédéric Godin, Carlos Octavio Pérez Mendoza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2024.106590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Horikawa and Nakagawa (2024) claim that in a complete market admitting statistical arbitrage, the difference between the deep hedging and the replicating portfolio hedging positions is a statistical arbitrage. Deep hedging can thus include an undesirable speculative component. We test whether this remains true in a GARCH-based incomplete market dynamics. We observe that the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging is a speculative overlay if the risk measure considered does not put sufficient relative weight on adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, a suitable choice of risk measure can prevent the deep hedging agent from engaging in speculation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106590\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging a statistical arbitrage?
Horikawa and Nakagawa (2024) claim that in a complete market admitting statistical arbitrage, the difference between the deep hedging and the replicating portfolio hedging positions is a statistical arbitrage. Deep hedging can thus include an undesirable speculative component. We test whether this remains true in a GARCH-based incomplete market dynamics. We observe that the difference between deep hedging and delta hedging is a speculative overlay if the risk measure considered does not put sufficient relative weight on adverse outcomes. Nevertheless, a suitable choice of risk measure can prevent the deep hedging agent from engaging in speculation.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance