在物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别仍然存在问题:一项系统综述。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450
Emre Ilhan, Kathleen Solis, Cindy Liu, Jamal Khawaja, Tran Dang Khoa Chau, Kelly Gray
{"title":"在物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别仍然存在问题:一项系统综述。","authors":"Emre Ilhan,&nbsp;Kathleen Solis,&nbsp;Cindy Liu,&nbsp;Jamal Khawaja,&nbsp;Tran Dang Khoa Chau,&nbsp;Kelly Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection or eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis methods</h3><div>Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only 5 journals were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications of key findings</h3><div>The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO Registration</h3><div>CRD42022383976.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Emre Ilhan,&nbsp;Kathleen Solis,&nbsp;Cindy Liu,&nbsp;Jamal Khawaja,&nbsp;Tran Dang Khoa Chau,&nbsp;Kelly Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection or eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis methods</h3><div>Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only 5 journals were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications of key findings</h3><div>The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO Registration</h3><div>CRD42022383976.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在物理治疗干预试验中,性别和/或性别是如何报告的,我们知之甚少。目的:确定物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别信息的性质和程度。数据来源:物理治疗,《物理治疗杂志》,《物理治疗》,《巴西物理治疗杂志》和《骨科与运动物理治疗杂志》。研究选择或资格标准:2018年至2024年间发表的物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验由两名审稿人在标题/摘要和全文阶段独立筛选,然后从符合条件的全文中提取数据。提取关于是否以及如何收集、报告和定义性别和/或性别数据的信息。综合方法:使用频率和百分比对数据进行描述性分析。结果:在纳入的182项研究中,153项研究没有进行性别和/或性别排斥的招募。其中,136项研究(89%)在报告人口统计特征时使用了“性别”或“性别”这一术语。三项研究使用了“出生时性别分配”这一术语。在报告性和/或性别时,82/139(59%)的研究提供了两种性和/或性别描述符(例如,男性和女性;男性和女性),39/139(28%)的研究提供了一个描述符(例如,女性),尽管不是性别和/或性别排斥。四项研究提供了2个以上的描述符(例如,变性女性)。在所有的研究中,性别和/或社会性别的定义都不清楚。除三项研究外,所有研究都不清楚如何收集性别和/或性别,以及数据收集方法是否允许选择性别多样化选项(例如,非二元)。局限性:仅调查了5家期刊。主要发现的结论和含义:缺乏对性别和/或性特征的包容性报告,限制了物理治疗研究的范围和适用性,限制了人类经验的全部范围。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42022383976。论文贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review

Background

Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.

Objectives

To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.

Data sources

Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.

Study selection or eligibility criteria

Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.

Synthesis methods

Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.

Results

Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.

Limitations

Only 5 journals were surveyed.

Conclusions and implications of key findings

The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.

PROSPERO Registration

CRD42022383976.

Contribution of the Paper

  • Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.
  • Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
377
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy. We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.
期刊最新文献
Editors List of Reviewers, 2024 Best practice recommendations for physiotherapists providing telerehabilitation to First Nations people: a modified Delphi study Employing a coaching model of supervision during physiotherapy placements: charting the learner experience in England Corrigendum to “Abstracts from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) 2023 Annual Conference” [Physiotherapy 123(Suppl. 1) (2023) e1–e272]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1