{"title":"在物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别仍然存在问题:一项系统综述。","authors":"Emre Ilhan, Kathleen Solis, Cindy Liu, Jamal Khawaja, Tran Dang Khoa Chau, Kelly Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection or eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis methods</h3><div>Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only 5 journals were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications of key findings</h3><div>The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO Registration</h3><div>CRD42022383976.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Emre Ilhan, Kathleen Solis, Cindy Liu, Jamal Khawaja, Tran Dang Khoa Chau, Kelly Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection or eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis methods</h3><div>Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only 5 journals were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications of key findings</h3><div>The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO Registration</h3><div>CRD42022383976.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review
Background
Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.
Objectives
To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.
Data sources
Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.
Study selection or eligibility criteria
Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.
Synthesis methods
Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.
Results
Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.
Limitations
Only 5 journals were surveyed.
Conclusions and implications of key findings
The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.
PROSPERO Registration
CRD42022383976.
Contribution of the Paper
•
Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.
•
Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy.
We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.