Reza Kolasangiani, Khashayar Farzanian, Yunfeng Chen, Martin A. Schwartz, Tamara C. Bidone
{"title":"αⅡbβ3和αVβ3整合素对力的构象反应","authors":"Reza Kolasangiani, Khashayar Farzanian, Yunfeng Chen, Martin A. Schwartz, Tamara C. Bidone","doi":"10.1016/j.str.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As major adhesion receptors, integrins transmit biochemical and mechanical signals across the plasma membrane. These functions are regulated by transitions between bent and extended conformations and modulated by force. To understand how force on integrins mediates cellular mechanosensing, we compared two highly homologous integrins, α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> and α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These integrins, expressed in circulating platelets vs. solid tissues, respectively, share the β<sub>3</sub> subunit, bind similar ligands and have similar bent and extended conformations. Here, we report that in cells expressing equivalent levels of each integrin, α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> mediates spreading on softer substrates than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These effects correlate with differences in structural dynamics of the two integrins under force. All-atom simulations show that α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> is more flexible than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub> due to correlated residue motions within the α subunit domains. Single molecule measurements confirm that α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> extends faster than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These results reveal a fundamental relationship between protein function and structural dynamics in cell mechanosensing.","PeriodicalId":22168,"journal":{"name":"Structure","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conformational response of αIIbβ3 and αVβ3 integrins to force\",\"authors\":\"Reza Kolasangiani, Khashayar Farzanian, Yunfeng Chen, Martin A. Schwartz, Tamara C. Bidone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.str.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As major adhesion receptors, integrins transmit biochemical and mechanical signals across the plasma membrane. These functions are regulated by transitions between bent and extended conformations and modulated by force. To understand how force on integrins mediates cellular mechanosensing, we compared two highly homologous integrins, α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> and α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These integrins, expressed in circulating platelets vs. solid tissues, respectively, share the β<sub>3</sub> subunit, bind similar ligands and have similar bent and extended conformations. Here, we report that in cells expressing equivalent levels of each integrin, α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> mediates spreading on softer substrates than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These effects correlate with differences in structural dynamics of the two integrins under force. All-atom simulations show that α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> is more flexible than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub> due to correlated residue motions within the α subunit domains. Single molecule measurements confirm that α<sub>IIb</sub>β<sub>3</sub> extends faster than α<sub>V</sub>β<sub>3</sub>. These results reveal a fundamental relationship between protein function and structural dynamics in cell mechanosensing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.11.016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.11.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作为主要的粘附受体,整合素通过质膜传递生化和机械信号。这些功能由弯曲构象和伸展构象之间的转换调节,并由力调节。为了了解整合素上的力是如何介导细胞机械传感的,我们比较了两种高度同源的整合素αIIbβ3和αVβ3。这些整合素分别在循环血小板和实体组织中表达,它们共享β3亚基,结合相似的配体,具有相似的弯曲和延伸构象。在这里,我们报告了在表达相同水平的每一种整合素的细胞中,αIIbβ3介导比αVβ3在更软的底物上的扩散。这些效应与两种整合素在作用力作用下的结构动力学差异有关。全原子模拟结果表明,α iib β3比α v β3更灵活,这是由于α亚基域内残基运动的关系。单分子测量证实αIIbβ3的延伸速度比αVβ3快。这些结果揭示了细胞机械传感中蛋白质功能与结构动力学之间的基本关系。
Conformational response of αIIbβ3 and αVβ3 integrins to force
As major adhesion receptors, integrins transmit biochemical and mechanical signals across the plasma membrane. These functions are regulated by transitions between bent and extended conformations and modulated by force. To understand how force on integrins mediates cellular mechanosensing, we compared two highly homologous integrins, αIIbβ3 and αVβ3. These integrins, expressed in circulating platelets vs. solid tissues, respectively, share the β3 subunit, bind similar ligands and have similar bent and extended conformations. Here, we report that in cells expressing equivalent levels of each integrin, αIIbβ3 mediates spreading on softer substrates than αVβ3. These effects correlate with differences in structural dynamics of the two integrins under force. All-atom simulations show that αIIbβ3 is more flexible than αVβ3 due to correlated residue motions within the α subunit domains. Single molecule measurements confirm that αIIbβ3 extends faster than αVβ3. These results reveal a fundamental relationship between protein function and structural dynamics in cell mechanosensing.
期刊介绍:
Structure aims to publish papers of exceptional interest in the field of structural biology. The journal strives to be essential reading for structural biologists, as well as biologists and biochemists that are interested in macromolecular structure and function. Structure strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that present structural and molecular insights into biological function and mechanism. Other reports that address fundamental questions in structural biology, such as structure-based examinations of protein evolution, folding, and/or design, will also be considered. We will consider the application of any method, experimental or computational, at high or low resolution, to conduct structural investigations, as long as the method is appropriate for the biological, functional, and mechanistic question(s) being addressed. Likewise, reports describing single-molecule analysis of biological mechanisms are welcome.
In general, the editors encourage submission of experimental structural studies that are enriched by an analysis of structure-activity relationships and will not consider studies that solely report structural information unless the structure or analysis is of exceptional and broad interest. Studies reporting only homology models, de novo models, or molecular dynamics simulations are also discouraged unless the models are informed by or validated by novel experimental data; rationalization of a large body of existing experimental evidence and making testable predictions based on a model or simulation is often not considered sufficient.