免疫检查点抑制剂对CD274 (PD-L1基因)扩增实体瘤的疗效评估:基于全国数据库的回顾性研究

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1136/jitc-2024-010130
Tomohiro Nakayama, Takayuki Takahama, Yasutaka Chiba, Naoki Shiraishi, Hisato Kawakami, Kimio Yonesaka, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Hidetoshi Hayashi
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂对CD274 (PD-L1基因)扩增实体瘤的疗效评估:基于全国数据库的回顾性研究","authors":"Tomohiro Nakayama, Takayuki Takahama, Yasutaka Chiba, Naoki Shiraishi, Hisato Kawakami, Kimio Yonesaka, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Hidetoshi Hayashi","doi":"10.1136/jitc-2024-010130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amplification of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 gene (<i>CD274</i>) is highly prevalent and associated with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lymphomas, and is also a potential biomarker for ICI treatment of solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs for solid tumors with <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been unclear. We here examined ICI efficacy for solid tumors with <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by CGP in a national database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database containing 60,155 CGP test results for individuals with solid tumors. Only clinical data from patients treated with ICIs alone (not those undergoing concomitant therapy with molecularly targeted or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents) were evaluated. We matched 48 patients in the <i>CD274</i> amplification-positive group with 170 patients in the <i>CD274</i> amplification-negative group in a 1:4 ratio based on tumor type, histology, treatment, and age. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and response rate were evaluated as treatment outcomes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was similar in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified and matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified groups (median of 22.1 vs 26.3 months, respectively; HR of 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.55 to 1.54; p=0.075). TTNT tended to be longer in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified group than in the matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified group (median of 16.5 vs 14.0 months; HR of 0.63 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.08; p=0.091). The objective response rate was 33.3% and 18.4% (difference of 14.9%, with a 95% CI of -0.2% to 31.6%), and the disease control rate was 63.9% and 41.1% (difference of 22.8%, with a 95% CI of 5.1% to 40.4%), in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified and matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of patients with solid tumors positive for <i>CD274</i> amplification in this analysis is the largest to date, and our results suggest that such gene amplification may be associated with the outcome of ICI treatment in such individuals. <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by CGP may therefore be a predictor of ICI efficacy for solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000029779.</p>","PeriodicalId":14820,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for solid tumors with <i>CD274</i> (PD-L1 gene) amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling: retrospective study based on a nationwide database.\",\"authors\":\"Tomohiro Nakayama, Takayuki Takahama, Yasutaka Chiba, Naoki Shiraishi, Hisato Kawakami, Kimio Yonesaka, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Hidetoshi Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jitc-2024-010130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amplification of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 gene (<i>CD274</i>) is highly prevalent and associated with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lymphomas, and is also a potential biomarker for ICI treatment of solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs for solid tumors with <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been unclear. We here examined ICI efficacy for solid tumors with <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by CGP in a national database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database containing 60,155 CGP test results for individuals with solid tumors. Only clinical data from patients treated with ICIs alone (not those undergoing concomitant therapy with molecularly targeted or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents) were evaluated. We matched 48 patients in the <i>CD274</i> amplification-positive group with 170 patients in the <i>CD274</i> amplification-negative group in a 1:4 ratio based on tumor type, histology, treatment, and age. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and response rate were evaluated as treatment outcomes in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was similar in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified and matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified groups (median of 22.1 vs 26.3 months, respectively; HR of 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.55 to 1.54; p=0.075). TTNT tended to be longer in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified group than in the matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified group (median of 16.5 vs 14.0 months; HR of 0.63 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.08; p=0.091). The objective response rate was 33.3% and 18.4% (difference of 14.9%, with a 95% CI of -0.2% to 31.6%), and the disease control rate was 63.9% and 41.1% (difference of 22.8%, with a 95% CI of 5.1% to 40.4%), in the <i>CD274</i>-amplified and matched <i>CD274</i>-non-amplified groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of patients with solid tumors positive for <i>CD274</i> amplification in this analysis is the largest to date, and our results suggest that such gene amplification may be associated with the outcome of ICI treatment in such individuals. <i>CD274</i> amplification identified by CGP may therefore be a predictor of ICI efficacy for solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000029779.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"12 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010130\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-010130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:程序性细胞死亡配体1基因(CD274)的扩增在淋巴瘤中非常普遍,并且与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的高应答率相关,并且也是ICI治疗实体瘤的潜在生物标志物。然而,ICIs对经综合基因组谱(CGP)鉴定的CD274扩增实体瘤的疗效尚不清楚。我们在此研究了ICI对国家数据库中CGP鉴定的CD274扩增实体瘤的疗效。方法:我们回顾性分析了来自癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心数据库的数据,其中包含60,155例实体瘤患者的CGP检测结果。仅评估单独接受ICIs治疗的患者的临床数据(不包括同时接受分子靶向或细胞毒性化疗药物治疗的患者)。我们将48例CD274扩增阳性组患者与170例CD274扩增阴性组患者根据肿瘤类型、组织学、治疗和年龄按1:4的比例进行匹配。评估两组患者的总生存期(OS)、到下一次治疗的时间(TTNT)和有效率。结果:cd274扩增组和匹配的cd274 -非扩增组的OS相似(中位数分别为22.1个月和26.3个月;HR为0.92,95% CI为0.55 ~ 1.54;p = 0.075)。cd274扩增组的TTNT时间往往长于匹配的cd274 -非扩增组(中位数为16.5个月vs 14.0个月;HR为0.63,95% CI为0.37 ~ 1.08;p = 0.091)。cd274扩增组和匹配cd274 -非扩增组的客观缓解率分别为33.3%和18.4%(差异为14.9%,95% CI为-0.2% ~ 31.6%),疾病控制率分别为63.9%和41.1%(差异为22.8%,95% CI为5.1% ~ 40.4%)。结论:该分析中CD274扩增阳性的实体瘤患者数量是迄今为止最多的,我们的结果表明这种基因扩增可能与这些个体的ICI治疗结果有关。因此,CGP鉴定的CD274扩增可能是ICI对实体瘤疗效的预测因子。试验注册号:UMIN000029779。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 (PD-L1 gene) amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling: retrospective study based on a nationwide database.

Background: Amplification of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 gene (CD274) is highly prevalent and associated with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lymphomas, and is also a potential biomarker for ICI treatment of solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been unclear. We here examined ICI efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by CGP in a national database.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database containing 60,155 CGP test results for individuals with solid tumors. Only clinical data from patients treated with ICIs alone (not those undergoing concomitant therapy with molecularly targeted or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents) were evaluated. We matched 48 patients in the CD274 amplification-positive group with 170 patients in the CD274 amplification-negative group in a 1:4 ratio based on tumor type, histology, treatment, and age. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and response rate were evaluated as treatment outcomes in the two groups.

Results: OS was similar in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups (median of 22.1 vs 26.3 months, respectively; HR of 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.55 to 1.54; p=0.075). TTNT tended to be longer in the CD274-amplified group than in the matched CD274-non-amplified group (median of 16.5 vs 14.0 months; HR of 0.63 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.08; p=0.091). The objective response rate was 33.3% and 18.4% (difference of 14.9%, with a 95% CI of -0.2% to 31.6%), and the disease control rate was 63.9% and 41.1% (difference of 22.8%, with a 95% CI of 5.1% to 40.4%), in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The number of patients with solid tumors positive for CD274 amplification in this analysis is the largest to date, and our results suggest that such gene amplification may be associated with the outcome of ICI treatment in such individuals. CD274 amplification identified by CGP may therefore be a predictor of ICI efficacy for solid tumors.

Trial registration number: UMIN000029779.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.60%
发文量
522
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (JITC) is a peer-reviewed publication that promotes scientific exchange and deepens knowledge in the constantly evolving fields of tumor immunology and cancer immunotherapy. With an open access format, JITC encourages widespread access to its findings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, spanning from basic science to translational and clinical research. Key areas of interest include tumor-host interactions, the intricate tumor microenvironment, animal models, the identification of predictive and prognostic immune biomarkers, groundbreaking pharmaceutical and cellular therapies, innovative vaccines, combination immune-based treatments, and the study of immune-related toxicity.
期刊最新文献
What's in a name? Memory NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Blocking the CD39/CD73 pathway synergizes with anti-CD20 bispecific antibody in nodal B-cell lymphoma. Arginase-1-specific T cells target and modulate tumor-associated macrophages. Rapamycin-resistant polyclonal Th1/Tc1 cell therapy (RAPA-201) safely induces disease remissions in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Combined PARP14 inhibition and PD-1 blockade promotes cytotoxic T cell quiescence and modulates macrophage polarization in relapsed melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1