用现成的单逆行胸支假体治疗急性主动脉病变的多中心经验。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.007
Kathryn L DiLosa, Michelle Manesh, Lucas Ruiter Kanamori, Mabel Chan, Gregory A Magee, Fernando Fleischman, Jason T Lee, Sara L Zettervall, Matthew P Sweet, Joel P Harding, Shahab Toursavadkohi, Javairiah Fatima, Gustavo S Oderich, Sukgu M Han, Steven Maximus
{"title":"用现成的单逆行胸支假体治疗急性主动脉病变的多中心经验。","authors":"Kathryn L DiLosa, Michelle Manesh, Lucas Ruiter Kanamori, Mabel Chan, Gregory A Magee, Fernando Fleischman, Jason T Lee, Sara L Zettervall, Matthew P Sweet, Joel P Harding, Shahab Toursavadkohi, Javairiah Fatima, Gustavo S Oderich, Sukgu M Han, Steven Maximus","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) (W.L. Gore) offers an off-the-shelf single option for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of aortic arch pathology with sealing in zones 0 to 2. This study reports the early outcomes of TBE-TEVAR for acute indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data, imaging, and outcomes of patients treated with TBE-TEVAR at seven institutions were retrospectively reviewed (March 2017 to March 2024). Patients treated for complicated aortic dissection, symptomatic aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, or blunt traumatic aortic injury by urgent/emergent repair were included. End points were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarction, prolonged intubation, stroke, paraplegia, dialysis, or bowel ischemia), and technical success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 356 patients treated by TBE-TEVAR, 107 (69.0% male; mean age, 60 ± 15 years) underwent repair for acute indications including 70 dissections (65%), 21 symptomatic aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms (20%), and 16 blunt traumatic aortic injuries (15%). Eight patients (8%) had repair immediately after open ascending repair of a type A dissection. Proximal sealing was in zone 2 in 91 patients (89%) and zone 0 to 1 in 11 patients (11%) who required cervical debranching. Technical success was achieved in all (99%) except one patient with acute dissection and aneurysmal degeneration requiring staged repair. At 30 days, two patients (2%) died, and 19 patients (18%) developed major adverse events, including stroke in six patients (6%) and paraplegia in six patients (6%). Five patients (5%; all Zone 2) had retrograde dissections, all treated for acute or subacute dissection, with no mortality. Mean follow-up was 55 ± 171 days, and 96 patients (94%) had follow-up imaging. Type IA or III endoleak occurred in seven patients (7%), retrograde branch occlusion in one (1%), and eleven (10%) required reintervention. Cumulative aortic-related mortality was three (3%) from aortic rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent/emergent TEVAR with the Gore TBE device in acute pathology offers low mortality, stroke, and paraplegia risk. Longer follow-up is needed to assess effectiveness of the repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-center experience with an off-the-shelf single retrograde thoracic branch endoprosthesis for acute aortic pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn L DiLosa, Michelle Manesh, Lucas Ruiter Kanamori, Mabel Chan, Gregory A Magee, Fernando Fleischman, Jason T Lee, Sara L Zettervall, Matthew P Sweet, Joel P Harding, Shahab Toursavadkohi, Javairiah Fatima, Gustavo S Oderich, Sukgu M Han, Steven Maximus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) (W.L. Gore) offers an off-the-shelf single option for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of aortic arch pathology with sealing in zones 0 to 2. This study reports the early outcomes of TBE-TEVAR for acute indications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data, imaging, and outcomes of patients treated with TBE-TEVAR at seven institutions were retrospectively reviewed (March 2017 to March 2024). Patients treated for complicated aortic dissection, symptomatic aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, or blunt traumatic aortic injury by urgent/emergent repair were included. End points were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarction, prolonged intubation, stroke, paraplegia, dialysis, or bowel ischemia), and technical success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 356 patients treated by TBE-TEVAR, 107 (69.0% male; mean age, 60 ± 15 years) underwent repair for acute indications including 70 dissections (65%), 21 symptomatic aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms (20%), and 16 blunt traumatic aortic injuries (15%). Eight patients (8%) had repair immediately after open ascending repair of a type A dissection. Proximal sealing was in zone 2 in 91 patients (89%) and zone 0 to 1 in 11 patients (11%) who required cervical debranching. Technical success was achieved in all (99%) except one patient with acute dissection and aneurysmal degeneration requiring staged repair. At 30 days, two patients (2%) died, and 19 patients (18%) developed major adverse events, including stroke in six patients (6%) and paraplegia in six patients (6%). Five patients (5%; all Zone 2) had retrograde dissections, all treated for acute or subacute dissection, with no mortality. Mean follow-up was 55 ± 171 days, and 96 patients (94%) had follow-up imaging. Type IA or III endoleak occurred in seven patients (7%), retrograde branch occlusion in one (1%), and eleven (10%) required reintervention. Cumulative aortic-related mortality was three (3%) from aortic rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent/emergent TEVAR with the Gore TBE device in acute pathology offers low mortality, stroke, and paraplegia risk. Longer follow-up is needed to assess effectiveness of the repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胸椎分支腔内假体(TBE®,WL Gore, Flagstaff AZ)为0-2区主动脉弓病变的胸椎腔内主动脉修复(TEVAR)提供了一种现成的单一选择。本研究报告了TBE®-TEVAR治疗急性适应症的早期结果。方法:回顾性分析7家机构(2017年3月- 2024年3月)接受TBE®- tevar治疗的患者的临床资料、影像学和结局。包括因复杂主动脉夹层、症状性动脉瘤/假性动脉瘤(PSA)或钝性外伤性主动脉损伤(BTAI)接受紧急修复治疗的患者。终点为30天死亡率、主要不良事件(MAEs:死亡率、心肌梗死、延长插管时间、中风、截瘫、透析或肠缺血)和技术成功。结果:在356例接受TBE®-TEVAR治疗的患者中,107例(69.0%男性,平均60±15岁)接受了急性适应症的修复,包括70例(65%)夹层,21例(20%)症状性动脉瘤/PSA和16例(15%)BTAIs。8例(8%)患者在a型夹层开放性上升修复术后立即进行修复。91例(89%)患者的近端闭合位于2区,11例(11%)患者的近端闭合位于0-1区。除一例需要分阶段修复的急性夹层和动脉瘤变性患者外,所有患者(99%)均取得了技术上的成功。30天时,2例(2%)患者死亡,19例(18%)发生MAEs,包括6例中风(6%)和6例截瘫(6%)。5例(5%;所有2区均为逆行夹层,均为急性或亚急性夹层,无死亡病例。平均随访55±171天,随访影像96例(94%)。7例(7%)发生IA型或III型内漏,1例(1%)发生逆行支闭塞,11例(10%)需要再次干预。主动脉破裂导致的累积主动脉相关死亡率为3例(3%)。结论:Gore TBE®装置用于急性病理的紧急/紧急TEVAR具有较低的死亡率、卒中和截瘫风险。需要更长时间的随访来评估修复的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-center experience with an off-the-shelf single retrograde thoracic branch endoprosthesis for acute aortic pathology.

Objective: The thoracic branch endoprosthesis (TBE) (W.L. Gore) offers an off-the-shelf single option for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of aortic arch pathology with sealing in zones 0 to 2. This study reports the early outcomes of TBE-TEVAR for acute indications.

Methods: Clinical data, imaging, and outcomes of patients treated with TBE-TEVAR at seven institutions were retrospectively reviewed (March 2017 to March 2024). Patients treated for complicated aortic dissection, symptomatic aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, or blunt traumatic aortic injury by urgent/emergent repair were included. End points were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarction, prolonged intubation, stroke, paraplegia, dialysis, or bowel ischemia), and technical success.

Results: Of 356 patients treated by TBE-TEVAR, 107 (69.0% male; mean age, 60 ± 15 years) underwent repair for acute indications including 70 dissections (65%), 21 symptomatic aneurysms/pseudoaneurysms (20%), and 16 blunt traumatic aortic injuries (15%). Eight patients (8%) had repair immediately after open ascending repair of a type A dissection. Proximal sealing was in zone 2 in 91 patients (89%) and zone 0 to 1 in 11 patients (11%) who required cervical debranching. Technical success was achieved in all (99%) except one patient with acute dissection and aneurysmal degeneration requiring staged repair. At 30 days, two patients (2%) died, and 19 patients (18%) developed major adverse events, including stroke in six patients (6%) and paraplegia in six patients (6%). Five patients (5%; all Zone 2) had retrograde dissections, all treated for acute or subacute dissection, with no mortality. Mean follow-up was 55 ± 171 days, and 96 patients (94%) had follow-up imaging. Type IA or III endoleak occurred in seven patients (7%), retrograde branch occlusion in one (1%), and eleven (10%) required reintervention. Cumulative aortic-related mortality was three (3%) from aortic rupture.

Conclusions: Urgent/emergent TEVAR with the Gore TBE device in acute pathology offers low mortality, stroke, and paraplegia risk. Longer follow-up is needed to assess effectiveness of the repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The great gender dilemma in complex aortic repair: Why do women fare worse with FEVAR? Controversies in the management strategy for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Endovascular strategies for the short distance between the lowest renal artery and aortic bifurcation. How do we afford the BEST care for females with chronic limb-threatening ischemia? How should failed infrarenal endovascular aortic repair with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance be managed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1