Jenifer H Voeks, Bret Hanlon, Thomas G Brott, Jon S Matsumura, Ken Rosenfield, Gary S Roubin, George Howard
{"title":"无症状颈动脉狭窄在CREST和ACT 1支架置入与动脉内膜切除术试验中的年龄影响。","authors":"Jenifer H Voeks, Bret Hanlon, Thomas G Brott, Jon S Matsumura, Ken Rosenfield, Gary S Roubin, George Howard","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed if age was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients, CREST and ACT 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 yearas with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (n<sub>CREST</sub> = 1091; n<sub>ACT 1</sub> = 1453) who were recruited between 2000 and 2013. Age was considered in four strata (<65, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years). The primary outcome was any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke afterwards. The secondary outcome of any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary outcome, there were no CAS vs CEA treatment differences within any age stratum (P > .05). For the secondary outcome of stroke or death, those randomized to CAS age 75 to 79 yearas were at approximately four times greater risk compared with those randomized to CEA (10% vs 2%; hazard ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.83). No treatment differences between CAS and CEA were detected for the three younger age strata, <65, 65 to 69, and 70 to 74 years (P > .05). For patients randomized to CAS, the risk of the primary endpoint for those aged 75 to 79 years was higher than the risk for those age <65 years (11% vs 4%; hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.53), without significant differences between other strata (P > .05). For those randomized to CEA, there were no differences between age strata (P > .1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pooled analysis of 2544 asymptomatic patients in CREST and ACT 1 shows a higher stroke or death risk for CAS compared with CEA in only the oldest age group, 75 to 79 years. For patients randomized to CAS, there was an increased risk for patients aged 75 to 79 years. No increased risk by age was found for patients randomized to CEA. Hence, the clinical management of asymptomatic patients above age 75 years must be individualized to optimize outcomes in the context of advances in CAS since 2013.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age effect in asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the CREST and ACT 1 stenting vs endarterectomy trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jenifer H Voeks, Bret Hanlon, Thomas G Brott, Jon S Matsumura, Ken Rosenfield, Gary S Roubin, George Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed if age was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients, CREST and ACT 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 yearas with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (n<sub>CREST</sub> = 1091; n<sub>ACT 1</sub> = 1453) who were recruited between 2000 and 2013. Age was considered in four strata (<65, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years). The primary outcome was any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke afterwards. The secondary outcome of any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary outcome, there were no CAS vs CEA treatment differences within any age stratum (P > .05). For the secondary outcome of stroke or death, those randomized to CAS age 75 to 79 yearas were at approximately four times greater risk compared with those randomized to CEA (10% vs 2%; hazard ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.83). No treatment differences between CAS and CEA were detected for the three younger age strata, <65, 65 to 69, and 70 to 74 years (P > .05). For patients randomized to CAS, the risk of the primary endpoint for those aged 75 to 79 years was higher than the risk for those age <65 years (11% vs 4%; hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.53), without significant differences between other strata (P > .05). For those randomized to CEA, there were no differences between age strata (P > .1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pooled analysis of 2544 asymptomatic patients in CREST and ACT 1 shows a higher stroke or death risk for CAS compared with CEA in only the oldest age group, 75 to 79 years. For patients randomized to CAS, there was an increased risk for patients aged 75 to 79 years. No increased risk by age was found for patients randomized to CEA. Hence, the clinical management of asymptomatic patients above age 75 years must be individualized to optimize outcomes in the context of advances in CAS since 2013.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Age effect in asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the CREST and ACT 1 stenting vs endarterectomy trials.
Objective: We assessed if age was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients, CREST and ACT 1.
Methods: We analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 yearas with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (nCREST = 1091; nACT 1 = 1453) who were recruited between 2000 and 2013. Age was considered in four strata (<65, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years). The primary outcome was any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke afterwards. The secondary outcome of any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years was also analyzed.
Results: For the primary outcome, there were no CAS vs CEA treatment differences within any age stratum (P > .05). For the secondary outcome of stroke or death, those randomized to CAS age 75 to 79 yearas were at approximately four times greater risk compared with those randomized to CEA (10% vs 2%; hazard ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.83). No treatment differences between CAS and CEA were detected for the three younger age strata, <65, 65 to 69, and 70 to 74 years (P > .05). For patients randomized to CAS, the risk of the primary endpoint for those aged 75 to 79 years was higher than the risk for those age <65 years (11% vs 4%; hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.53), without significant differences between other strata (P > .05). For those randomized to CEA, there were no differences between age strata (P > .1).
Conclusions: This pooled analysis of 2544 asymptomatic patients in CREST and ACT 1 shows a higher stroke or death risk for CAS compared with CEA in only the oldest age group, 75 to 79 years. For patients randomized to CAS, there was an increased risk for patients aged 75 to 79 years. No increased risk by age was found for patients randomized to CEA. Hence, the clinical management of asymptomatic patients above age 75 years must be individualized to optimize outcomes in the context of advances in CAS since 2013.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
