基于非对比MRI的机器学习和放射组学特征可以预测原发性下肢淋巴水肿的严重程度。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102161
Jie Ren, Xingpeng Li, Mengke Liu, Tingting Cui, Jia Guo, Rongjie Zhou, Kun Hao, Rengui Wang, Yunlong Yue
{"title":"基于非对比MRI的机器学习和放射组学特征可以预测原发性下肢淋巴水肿的严重程度。","authors":"Jie Ren, Xingpeng Li, Mengke Liu, Tingting Cui, Jia Guo, Rongjie Zhou, Kun Hao, Rengui Wang, Yunlong Yue","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>According to International Lymphology Society guidelines, the severity of lymphedema is determined by the difference in volume between the affected limb and the healthy side divided by the volume of the healthy side. However, this method of measuring volume is time consuming, laborious, and has certain errors in clinical applications. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether machine learning radiomics features based on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 119 patients with primary lower limb lymphedema. The enrolled patients were divided into a nonsevere group (mild and moderate) and a severe group. Using the semiautomatic threshold method in ITK-snap software on the patient's noncontrast MRI, we filled the area between the subcutaneous tissue and muscle of the edematous site. The PyRadiomics software package was used to extract radiomic features. The radiomic features were analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney test. Subsequently, Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening were performed. Using Scikit-learn, the remaining features were used to construct five models: logistic regression, support vector machine, random Forest, ExtraTrees, and light gradient boosting machine. The predictive performance were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and specificity of these measures were calculated. The predictive curve was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive model in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enrolled patients including 28 patients with mild lymphedema (grade I), 38 patients with moderate lymphedema (grade II), and 53 patients with severe lymphedema (grade III) was conducted. A total of 1196 features were extracted, and after Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening, 21 nonzero features were selected. The ExtraTree model performed the best, with an area under the curve of 0.974 (95% confidence interval, 0.9437-1.0000) in the training set, a sensitivity of 89.2%, and a specificity of 95.7%. In the test set, these values were 0.938 (95% confidence interval, 0.8539-1.0000), 75%, and 100%, respectively. The decision curve showed that when the predicted probability was between 16% and 78%, the net benefit of the ExtraTree model was greater than that of the two extreme curves, indicating strong clinical value in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All five models performed well in distinguishing between the nonsevere group and the severe group. Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":" ","pages":"102161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning and radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Ren, Xingpeng Li, Mengke Liu, Tingting Cui, Jia Guo, Rongjie Zhou, Kun Hao, Rengui Wang, Yunlong Yue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>According to International Lymphology Society guidelines, the severity of lymphedema is determined by the difference in volume between the affected limb and the healthy side divided by the volume of the healthy side. However, this method of measuring volume is time consuming, laborious, and has certain errors in clinical applications. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether machine learning radiomics features based on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 119 patients with primary lower limb lymphedema. The enrolled patients were divided into a nonsevere group (mild and moderate) and a severe group. Using the semiautomatic threshold method in ITK-snap software on the patient's noncontrast MRI, we filled the area between the subcutaneous tissue and muscle of the edematous site. The PyRadiomics software package was used to extract radiomic features. The radiomic features were analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney test. Subsequently, Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening were performed. Using Scikit-learn, the remaining features were used to construct five models: logistic regression, support vector machine, random Forest, ExtraTrees, and light gradient boosting machine. The predictive performance were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and specificity of these measures were calculated. The predictive curve was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive model in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enrolled patients including 28 patients with mild lymphedema (grade I), 38 patients with moderate lymphedema (grade II), and 53 patients with severe lymphedema (grade III) was conducted. A total of 1196 features were extracted, and after Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening, 21 nonzero features were selected. The ExtraTree model performed the best, with an area under the curve of 0.974 (95% confidence interval, 0.9437-1.0000) in the training set, a sensitivity of 89.2%, and a specificity of 95.7%. In the test set, these values were 0.938 (95% confidence interval, 0.8539-1.0000), 75%, and 100%, respectively. The decision curve showed that when the predicted probability was between 16% and 78%, the net benefit of the ExtraTree model was greater than that of the two extreme curves, indicating strong clinical value in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All five models performed well in distinguishing between the nonsevere group and the severe group. Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据国际淋巴学会的指南,淋巴水肿的严重程度由患肢与健康侧体积之差除以健康侧体积来确定。然而,这种测量体积的方法耗时,费力,并且在临床应用中存在一定的误差。因此,本研究旨在探讨基于非对比磁共振成像(NCMRI)的机器学习放射组学特征是否可以预测原发性下肢淋巴水肿的严重程度。方法:对119例原发性下肢淋巴水肿患者进行回顾性分析。入组患者分为非重度组(轻度和中度)和重度组。采用患者NCMRI ITK-snap软件中的半自动阈值法,对水肿部位皮下组织与肌肉之间的区域进行填充。使用PyRadiomics软件包提取放射学特征。放射学特征分析采用t检验或Mann-Whitney检验。随后进行Pearson相关检验和Lasso筛选。使用Scikit-learn,剩余的特征被用来构建五个模型:Logistic回归、支持向量机、随机森林、ExtraTrees和光梯度增强机。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评价预测效果,并计算这些指标的敏感性和特异性。预测曲线用于评估预测模型在指导非严重和严重淋巴水肿患者决策中的性能。结果:纳入的患者包括轻度(I级)淋巴水肿患者28例,中度(II级)淋巴水肿患者38例,重度(III级)淋巴水肿患者53例。共提取了1196个特征,经过Pearson相关检验和Lasso筛选,筛选出21个非零特征。ExtraTree模型表现最好,在训练集中的AUC为0.974 (95% CI: 0.9437-1.0000),灵敏度为89.2%,特异性为95.7%。在测试集中,这些值分别为0.938 (95% CI: 0.8539-1.0000)、75%和100%。决策曲线显示,当预测概率在16% ~ 78%之间时,ExtraTree模型的净收益大于两个极值曲线的净收益,对非重度和重度淋巴水肿患者的决策具有较强的临床指导价值。结论:5种模型均能较好地区分非重度组和重度组。基于NCMRI的机器学习放射组学特征可以预测原发性下肢淋巴水肿的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning and radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

Objective: According to International Lymphology Society guidelines, the severity of lymphedema is determined by the difference in volume between the affected limb and the healthy side divided by the volume of the healthy side. However, this method of measuring volume is time consuming, laborious, and has certain errors in clinical applications. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether machine learning radiomics features based on noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 119 patients with primary lower limb lymphedema. The enrolled patients were divided into a nonsevere group (mild and moderate) and a severe group. Using the semiautomatic threshold method in ITK-snap software on the patient's noncontrast MRI, we filled the area between the subcutaneous tissue and muscle of the edematous site. The PyRadiomics software package was used to extract radiomic features. The radiomic features were analyzed using the t test or Mann-Whitney test. Subsequently, Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening were performed. Using Scikit-learn, the remaining features were used to construct five models: logistic regression, support vector machine, random Forest, ExtraTrees, and light gradient boosting machine. The predictive performance were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the sensitivity and specificity of these measures were calculated. The predictive curve was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive model in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.

Results: The enrolled patients including 28 patients with mild lymphedema (grade I), 38 patients with moderate lymphedema (grade II), and 53 patients with severe lymphedema (grade III) was conducted. A total of 1196 features were extracted, and after Pearson correlation testing and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator screening, 21 nonzero features were selected. The ExtraTree model performed the best, with an area under the curve of 0.974 (95% confidence interval, 0.9437-1.0000) in the training set, a sensitivity of 89.2%, and a specificity of 95.7%. In the test set, these values were 0.938 (95% confidence interval, 0.8539-1.0000), 75%, and 100%, respectively. The decision curve showed that when the predicted probability was between 16% and 78%, the net benefit of the ExtraTree model was greater than that of the two extreme curves, indicating strong clinical value in guiding decisions for nonsevere and severe lymphedema patients.

Conclusions: All five models performed well in distinguishing between the nonsevere group and the severe group. Noncontrast MRI-based machine learning radiomics signature can predict the severity of primary lower limb lymphedema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders SURGERYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE&n-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
328
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Continuation of Anticoagulation through Ambulatory Phlebectomy Does Not Impact Post-Operative Bleeding Risk. Mechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Utilization in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a database of a tertiary hospital. PROMISING RESULTS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY FOR TREATING CHRONIC VENOUS ULCERS. A preliminary experience on the efficacy, safety and short-term results in the treatment of acute bilateral iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with the Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy. The value of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the grading of primary lower extremity lymphedema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1