Siobhan Manners, Lynn B Meuleners, Jonathon Q Ng, Joanne Wood, William Morgan, Nigel Morlet
{"title":"双眼视野丧失和碰撞风险:一项基于eFOVID人群的研究。","authors":"Siobhan Manners, Lynn B Meuleners, Jonathon Q Ng, Joanne Wood, William Morgan, Nigel Morlet","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Visual field loss poses a high personal cost to those affected, significantly impacting activities of daily living, including driving. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between visual field loss and crash risk. This study examined the association between severity and location of binocular visual field loss and motor vehicle crashes in older adults aged 50+, using linked population data over a 29-year study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a database of visual field tests obtained from ophthalmologists in Western Australia (WA) between 1990 and 2019, deficits in field sensitivity were identified and classified into three severities across five regions. This was linked to other government administrative databases including crash data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,296 people, 4,307 (13.76%) older drivers were involved in 5,537 vehicle crashes. Binocular visual field loss (regardless of severity and location) significantly increased the odds of a crash by 84% (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.97). Severe visual field loss significantly increased the odds of a crash by 98% in the upper left quadrant (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.06), 97% in the lower left (OR 1.97; CI 1.80-2.16), 89% in the lower right (OR 1.89; CI 1.72-2.06) and 95% in the upper right quadrant (OR 1.95; CI 1.78-2.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large population-based study provided robust estimates on the degree of severity and specific locations of visual field loss that threaten safe driving and objective evidence on the usefulness of linking large customised ophthalmic databases to crash records for developing 'fitness to drive' guidelines for older drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Siobhan Manners, Lynn B Meuleners, Jonathon Q Ng, Joanne Wood, William Morgan, Nigel Morlet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Visual field loss poses a high personal cost to those affected, significantly impacting activities of daily living, including driving. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between visual field loss and crash risk. This study examined the association between severity and location of binocular visual field loss and motor vehicle crashes in older adults aged 50+, using linked population data over a 29-year study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a database of visual field tests obtained from ophthalmologists in Western Australia (WA) between 1990 and 2019, deficits in field sensitivity were identified and classified into three severities across five regions. This was linked to other government administrative databases including crash data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,296 people, 4,307 (13.76%) older drivers were involved in 5,537 vehicle crashes. Binocular visual field loss (regardless of severity and location) significantly increased the odds of a crash by 84% (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.97). Severe visual field loss significantly increased the odds of a crash by 98% in the upper left quadrant (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.06), 97% in the lower left (OR 1.97; CI 1.80-2.16), 89% in the lower right (OR 1.89; CI 1.72-2.06) and 95% in the upper right quadrant (OR 1.95; CI 1.78-2.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large population-based study provided robust estimates on the degree of severity and specific locations of visual field loss that threaten safe driving and objective evidence on the usefulness of linking large customised ophthalmic databases to crash records for developing 'fitness to drive' guidelines for older drivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:视野丧失会给患者带来很高的个人成本,严重影响日常生活活动,包括驾驶。然而,关于视野丧失和撞车风险之间的关系,有相互矛盾的证据。本研究调查了50岁以上老年人双眼视野丧失的严重程度和位置与机动车碰撞之间的关系,使用了29年研究期间的相关人口数据。方法:使用西澳大利亚州眼科医生1990年至2019年的视野测试数据库,确定视野敏感性缺陷,并将其分为五个地区的三个严重程度。这与其他政府管理数据库相连,包括坠机数据。结果:在31296人中,有4307名(13.76%)老年司机参与了5537起交通事故。双眼视野丧失(无论严重程度和位置)使坠机几率显著增加84% (OR 1.84;95% ci 1.71-1.97)。严重的视野丧失显著增加了左上象限98%的撞车几率(OR 1.98;95% CI 1.70-2.06),左下角为97% (OR 1.97;CI 1.80-2.16),右下方89% (OR 1.89;CI 1.72-2.06),右上象限95% (OR 1.95;可信区间1.78 - -2.14)。结论:这项以人群为基础的大型研究提供了对威胁安全驾驶的视野丧失的严重程度和特定位置的可靠估计,并提供了客观证据,证明将大型定制眼科数据库与碰撞记录联系起来,有助于为老年司机制定“健康驾驶”指南。
Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study.
Purpose: Visual field loss poses a high personal cost to those affected, significantly impacting activities of daily living, including driving. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between visual field loss and crash risk. This study examined the association between severity and location of binocular visual field loss and motor vehicle crashes in older adults aged 50+, using linked population data over a 29-year study period.
Methods: Using a database of visual field tests obtained from ophthalmologists in Western Australia (WA) between 1990 and 2019, deficits in field sensitivity were identified and classified into three severities across five regions. This was linked to other government administrative databases including crash data.
Results: Of 31,296 people, 4,307 (13.76%) older drivers were involved in 5,537 vehicle crashes. Binocular visual field loss (regardless of severity and location) significantly increased the odds of a crash by 84% (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.97). Severe visual field loss significantly increased the odds of a crash by 98% in the upper left quadrant (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.06), 97% in the lower left (OR 1.97; CI 1.80-2.16), 89% in the lower right (OR 1.89; CI 1.72-2.06) and 95% in the upper right quadrant (OR 1.95; CI 1.78-2.14).
Conclusion: The large population-based study provided robust estimates on the degree of severity and specific locations of visual field loss that threaten safe driving and objective evidence on the usefulness of linking large customised ophthalmic databases to crash records for developing 'fitness to drive' guidelines for older drivers.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.