主要犯罪过程中的武器使用:一项针对加拿大安大略省法医精神病患者的研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s40621-024-00551-z
Mark Mohan Kaggwa, Arianna Davids, Parwiz Mohibi, Bailea Erb, John Bradford, Gary Andrew Chaimowitz, Andrew Toyin Olagunju
{"title":"主要犯罪过程中的武器使用:一项针对加拿大安大略省法医精神病患者的研究。","authors":"Mark Mohan Kaggwa, Arianna Davids, Parwiz Mohibi, Bailea Erb, John Bradford, Gary Andrew Chaimowitz, Andrew Toyin Olagunju","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00551-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the nature and circumstances around the use of weapons to perpetrate an offense among individuals with mental illness is crucial for evidence-informed policies and actions. However, little is known about the prevalence and factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among patients in the forensic system. Therefore, the present study was designed to address this gap and determine the prevalence and the patient and victim characteristics associated with weapon use during the index offense in a Canadian province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective exploratory study utilized data extracted from the Ontario Review Board reports of 2014/15. Data was analyzed using Stata, and logistic regression was employed to determine the factors associated with weapon use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately half (48.11%) of the individuals included in this analysis (n = 819) used weapons during their index offense as an instrument of violence. Both patient-related and victim-related factors had a statistically significant association with weapon use during index offenses. Specifically, two patient-related factors (including a history of hospitalization prior to the index offense and diagnosis of personality disorder) were associated with lower odds of weapon use during the index offense. However, only prior hospitalization remained statistically significant after adjusting for victims' factors. Victim-related factors were associated with both lower and higher odds of weapon use during the index offense. The highest odds of weapon use were found if the victim was an extended family member of the patient, followed by sibling, lover/partner/spouse, parent, and then adult acquaintance. The odds of weapon use during the index offense were lower if victims were healthcare workers, law enforcement professionals, and females when compared to adult strangers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the significant role of both patients' and victims' characteristics as important factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among forensic patients. Notably, prior hospitalization emerged as a crucial factor with a reduced likelihood of weapon use. Implicitly, this underscores the importance of risk mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weapon use during the index offense: a study among forensic psychiatry patients in Ontario, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Mohan Kaggwa, Arianna Davids, Parwiz Mohibi, Bailea Erb, John Bradford, Gary Andrew Chaimowitz, Andrew Toyin Olagunju\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40621-024-00551-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the nature and circumstances around the use of weapons to perpetrate an offense among individuals with mental illness is crucial for evidence-informed policies and actions. However, little is known about the prevalence and factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among patients in the forensic system. Therefore, the present study was designed to address this gap and determine the prevalence and the patient and victim characteristics associated with weapon use during the index offense in a Canadian province.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective exploratory study utilized data extracted from the Ontario Review Board reports of 2014/15. Data was analyzed using Stata, and logistic regression was employed to determine the factors associated with weapon use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately half (48.11%) of the individuals included in this analysis (n = 819) used weapons during their index offense as an instrument of violence. Both patient-related and victim-related factors had a statistically significant association with weapon use during index offenses. Specifically, two patient-related factors (including a history of hospitalization prior to the index offense and diagnosis of personality disorder) were associated with lower odds of weapon use during the index offense. However, only prior hospitalization remained statistically significant after adjusting for victims' factors. Victim-related factors were associated with both lower and higher odds of weapon use during the index offense. The highest odds of weapon use were found if the victim was an extended family member of the patient, followed by sibling, lover/partner/spouse, parent, and then adult acquaintance. The odds of weapon use during the index offense were lower if victims were healthcare workers, law enforcement professionals, and females when compared to adult strangers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the significant role of both patients' and victims' characteristics as important factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among forensic patients. Notably, prior hospitalization emerged as a crucial factor with a reduced likelihood of weapon use. Implicitly, this underscores the importance of risk mitigation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00551-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00551-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解精神疾病患者使用武器实施犯罪的性质和情况对于循证政策和行动至关重要。然而,在法医系统中,很少有人知道在指向性犯罪中患者使用武器的流行程度和相关因素。因此,本研究旨在解决这一差距,并确定在加拿大一个省的指数犯罪期间与武器使用相关的患病率和患者和受害者特征。方法:本回顾性探索性研究采用安大略省审查委员会2014/15年度报告中的数据。使用Stata对数据进行分析,并采用逻辑回归来确定与武器使用相关的因素。结果:大约一半(48.11%)的人(n = 819)在他们的主要犯罪中使用武器作为暴力工具。患者相关因素和受害者相关因素与指向性犯罪中武器使用有统计学意义的关联。具体而言,两个与患者相关的因素(包括在严重犯罪之前的住院史和人格障碍的诊断)与严重犯罪期间较低的武器使用几率相关。然而,在对受害者因素进行调整后,只有先前的住院经历仍然具有统计学意义。与受害者相关的因素与指向性犯罪中使用武器的几率有高有低都有关联。如果受害者是患者的大家庭成员,那么使用武器的可能性最高,其次是兄弟姐妹,情人/伴侣/配偶,父母,然后是成年熟人。与成年陌生人相比,如果受害者是医护人员、执法专业人员和女性,那么在指数犯罪中使用武器的几率就会降低。结论:本研究强调了在指向性犯罪中,患者和受害者的特征都是影响法医患者武器使用的重要因素。值得注意的是,先前住院是降低使用武器可能性的一个关键因素。这无疑强调了减轻风险战略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weapon use during the index offense: a study among forensic psychiatry patients in Ontario, Canada.

Background: Understanding the nature and circumstances around the use of weapons to perpetrate an offense among individuals with mental illness is crucial for evidence-informed policies and actions. However, little is known about the prevalence and factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among patients in the forensic system. Therefore, the present study was designed to address this gap and determine the prevalence and the patient and victim characteristics associated with weapon use during the index offense in a Canadian province.

Methods: This retrospective exploratory study utilized data extracted from the Ontario Review Board reports of 2014/15. Data was analyzed using Stata, and logistic regression was employed to determine the factors associated with weapon use.

Results: Approximately half (48.11%) of the individuals included in this analysis (n = 819) used weapons during their index offense as an instrument of violence. Both patient-related and victim-related factors had a statistically significant association with weapon use during index offenses. Specifically, two patient-related factors (including a history of hospitalization prior to the index offense and diagnosis of personality disorder) were associated with lower odds of weapon use during the index offense. However, only prior hospitalization remained statistically significant after adjusting for victims' factors. Victim-related factors were associated with both lower and higher odds of weapon use during the index offense. The highest odds of weapon use were found if the victim was an extended family member of the patient, followed by sibling, lover/partner/spouse, parent, and then adult acquaintance. The odds of weapon use during the index offense were lower if victims were healthcare workers, law enforcement professionals, and females when compared to adult strangers.

Conclusion: The study highlights the significant role of both patients' and victims' characteristics as important factors associated with weapon use during index offenses among forensic patients. Notably, prior hospitalization emerged as a crucial factor with a reduced likelihood of weapon use. Implicitly, this underscores the importance of risk mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
期刊最新文献
The influence of heatwaves on traffic safety in five cities across Québec with different thermal landscapes. Understanding caregiver preferences for firearm locking devices in a pediatric emergency department. Snakebites and resource utilization in pediatric urban and rural populations in the United States: 2016-2023. Structural racism and intimate partner violence perpetration among racially diverse men transitioning into fatherhood: an anti-racist approach to IPV prevention. A content analysis of the Orbeez® Gel Blaster injury challenge on TikTok.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1